Proverbs 6:30-33
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The verse doesn't suggest that stealing due to hunger is acceptable or unpunished; rather, it highlights a subtle human empathy that pities the thief driven by necessity, contrasting it with the utter lack of understanding and unforgivable nature of adultery. This distinction reveals that while society might show a sliver of compassion for survival-driven theft, it reserves its deepest contempt for the adulterer who risks everything for selfish desire.
People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy his appetite when he is hungry, but if he is caught, he will pay sevenfold; he will give all the goods of his house. He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who does it destroys himself. He will get wounds and dishonor, and his disgrace will not be wiped away.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Solomon is contrasting the sin of adultery with theft, arguing that even a thief driven by extreme hunger is viewed with more pity than outright contempt. While the thief still faces consequences and must make restitution, the adulterer, who acts out of selfish desire rather than desperate need, is presented as foolish and deserving of far harsher judgment and shame.
Why might people show a thief some understanding when they catch him? It’s not about excusing the act, but understanding the motive.
This verse highlights a crucial distinction in human judgment. When someone steals out of sheer hunger, driven by the most basic need for survival, people tend to feel pity rather than outright contempt.
The thief might steal to survive, but the adulterer often risks everything for something far less essential. Where does the real disgrace lie?
The contrast in this passage isn't just about the act, but the depth of disgrace and understanding required. While a thief driven by hunger might earn pity, the adulterer is described as someone who 'lacks understanding.'
Ask a follow-up
Understand the original words
gannab · Hebrew Noun
One who takes property belonging to another without permission. In biblical law, theft is a violation of the commandment to love one's neighbor and respect property, though it is viewed through different lenses depending on the necessity of the thief.
nephesh · Hebrew Noun
The physical or metaphorical desire or craving of a person. It refers to the basic human drive for sustenance or satisfaction, which, if left uncontrolled, can lead to sinful behavior.
shalam · Hebrew Verb
In biblical law and wisdom, to pay or restore something, often implying the concept of restitution for a wrong committed. The number seven is frequently associated with completeness or the intensity of the penalty required to satisfy justice.
hon · Hebrew Noun
A general term referring to material possessions, wealth, or substance. In the context of wisdom literature, it represents the fruits of one's labor or the resources God has provided to an individual.
na'aph · Hebrew Verb
Sexual relations between a married person and someone other than their spouse, considered a serious sin against God, the covenant of marriage, and one’s neighbor. It is treated in Proverbs as a betrayal of trust and a violation of divine wisdom.
chasar-leb · Hebrew Noun phrase
A phrase denoting a deficiency of heart or understanding; it implies a failure to grasp divine wisdom or the fatal consequences of one's sinful actions. The "heart" in Hebrew thought is the center of the intellect, will, and moral decision-making.
qalon · Hebrew Noun
A state of shame, public humiliation, or loss of reputation. In a biblical context, it often refers to the natural and divine consequences of sin that mar the image of God in an individual.
This passage outlines the Mosaic Law's requirement for restitution, noting that even a thief, driven by necessity, had to repay multiple times the value of what was stolen, though the thief might receive more pity than contempt.
Leviticus 25:39-43This passage deals with the treatment of Israelites who fell into poverty and servitude, highlighting a societal understanding that extreme need could lead to desperate acts, though still requiring a framework for justice and eventual freedom.
Luke 7:36-50In this story, a sinful woman who anoints Jesus' feet is forgiven due to her great love, which Jesus links to her sins being forgiven because they were many; this shows a divine compassion for those driven by desperate circumstances or deep need, contrasting with the unforgiving nature of sin rooted in understanding.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10This passage lists various sins that will not inherit the kingdom of God, including thieves, but it places adultery in a different category, often viewed as a more grievous offense due to its violation of covenant and trust, which aligns with Proverbs' comparison.
Romans 13:1-7This passage speaks about submitting to governing authorities as God's servants, noting that they 'do not bear the sword in vain' for punishing wrongdoers, acknowledging that even actions stemming from necessity have legal consequences.
bensonProverbs 6:30: "Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry;"
Proverbs 6:30-35. Men do not despise a thief — That is, abhor or reproach him, but rather pity and pardon him, who is urged by mere necessity to these practices, but the adulterer is abhorred by all. If he — The thief; be found, he shall restore seven-fold — The law ( Exodus 22:1-4 ) did not oblige the thief to restore seven-fold, but only five oxen for one, or in another case double. Some persons th…
clarkeProverbs 6:30: "Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry;"
Men do not despise a thief if he steal - Every man pities the poor culprit who was perishing for lack of food, and stole to satisfy his hunger; yet no law clears him: he is bound to make restitution; in some cases double, in others quadruple and quintuple; and if he have not property enough to make restitution, to be sold for a bondsman; Exodus 22:1-4 ; Leviticus 25:39 .
The verse doesn't suggest that stealing due to hunger is acceptable or unpunished; rather, it highlights a subtle human empathy that pities the thief driven by necessity, contrasting it with the utter lack of understanding and unforgivable nature of adultery. This distinction reveals that while society might show a sliver of compassion for survival-driven theft, it reserves its deepest contempt for the adulterer who risks everything for selfish desire.
Solomon is contrasting the sin of adultery with theft, arguing that even a thief driven by extreme hunger is viewed with more pity than outright contempt. While the thief still faces consequences and must make restitution, the adulterer, who acts out of selfish desire rather than desperate need, is presented as foolish and deserving of far harsher judgment and shame.
Solomon is contrasting the sin of adultery with theft, arguing that even a thief driven by extreme hunger is viewed with more pity than outright contempt. While the thief still faces consequences and must make restitution, the adulterer, who acts out of selfish desire rather than desperate need, is presented as foolish and deserving of far harsher judgment and shame.
"People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy his appetite when he is hungry, but if he is caught, he will pay sevenfold; he will give all the goods of his house. He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who…" — The verse doesn't suggest that stealing due to hunger is acceptable or unpunished; rather, it highlights a subtle human empathy that pities the thief driven by necessity, contrasting it with the utte…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
