but the person who eats of the flesh of the sacrifice of the LORD’s peace offerings while an uncleanness is on him, that person shall be cut off from his people.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Leviticus 7:20
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This verse highlights a crucial, often overlooked aspect of worship: "uncleanness" wasn't just about being visibly dirty, but about a state of legal impurity that rendered one unfit to approach God, even for a celebration. Sharing in the sacred meal of peace offerings in such a state was seen as a profound disrespect, not just to the ritual, but to God Himself. This emphasizes that holiness and purity were foundational requirements for any interaction with the divine, not optional extras.
but the person who eats of the flesh of the sacrifice of the LORD’s peace offerings while an uncleanness is on him, that person shall be cut off from his people.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This passage is part of a larger instruction on the proper handling of peace offerings, which were sacrifices of thanksgiving and fellowship. Before this verse, the rules detail how the priests and the offerer should share in the sacrificial meal, but here the tone shifts to address severe transgression. The consequence of eating the holy sacrifice while in a state of ritual impurity, specifically from an internal bodily issue or contact with unclean things, is exclusion from the community, highlighting the sanctity of these offerings and God's presence.
Peace offerings were sacred meals shared between God and His people. But what happened when someone showed up to this divine dinner party unclean?
Sharing in Holiness
The sacrifices of peace offerings in Leviticus were unique. They weren't just about atonement for sin, but also about fellowship and thanksgiving. A portion was burned for God, a portion went to the priests, and a portion was eaten by the offerer and their family.
This was a sacred, shared meal, a tangible sign of community with God.
The Absolute Requirement of Purity
Leviticus 7:20 makes it clear: if someone partook of this holy meal while in a state of ritual impurity (whether from bodily discharges, touching something unclean, or other specified reasons), they faced severe consequences. They were to be 'cut off from his people.' This meant exclusion from the community and its covenant blessings, and sometimes even premature death.
This wasn't about God being petty; it was about preserving the sanctity of His presence and His covenant. Purity wasn't just a suggestion; it was essential for drawing near to a holy God, even in a context of peace and fellowship.
Being 'cut off from his people' sounds harsh. What did that really mean in the context of ancient Israel?
Exclusion from Covenant Blessing
Ask a follow-up
The phrase 'cut off from his people' (Hebrew: kareth) signifies a severe form of separation. It wasn't always immediate physical death, but it definitely meant exclusion from the covenant community and its privileges.
Dimensions of Separation
This consequence underscores that belonging to God's people and enjoying fellowship with Him carried significant responsibilities, especially concerning holiness.
Understand the original words
karath · Hebrew Verb
A severe divine judgment or penalty involving the removal of an individual from the covenant community, signifying exclusion, loss of status, and spiritual death.
This passage parallels the idea of partaking in something holy while in an unfit state, warning of severe spiritual consequences, much like consuming the peace offering while unclean meant exclusion.
Hebrews 9:22It highlights the Old Testament principle that almost everything is cleansed with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness, underscoring why ritual purity was so paramount for approaching God.
Numbers 19:20This verse also speaks of being 'cut off' from the community for failing to perform the purification rites after contact with death, reinforcing the severe consequences of remaining ritually impure before God.
2 Chronicles 23:19This passage shows the practical outworking of maintaining purity in worship, where the priests were commanded to keep the charge of the house of the LORD, which included proper service and holiness.
gillLeviticus 7:20: "But the soul that eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings, that pertain unto the LORD, having his uncleanness upon him, even that soul shall be cut off from his people."
But the soul that eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of the peace offerings, that pertain unto the Lord,.... That are offered up to him, and so are holy, and therefore not to be eaten by unholy persons, or by any having his uncleanness upon him; a profluvious person that has an issue running o…
clarkeLeviticus 7:20: "But the soul that eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings, that pertain unto the LORD, having his uncleanness upon him, even that soul shall be cut off from his people."
Having his uncleanness upon him - Having touched any unclean thing by which he became legally defiled, and had not washed his clothes, and bathed his flesh.
This verse highlights a crucial, often overlooked aspect of worship: "uncleanness" wasn't just about being visibly dirty, but about a state of legal impurity that rendered one unfit to approach God, even for a celebration. Sharing in the sacred meal of peace offerings in such a state was seen as a profound disrespect, not just to the ritual, but to God Himself. This emphasizes that holiness and purity were foundational requirements for any interaction with the divine, not optional extras.
This passage is part of a larger instruction on the proper handling of peace offerings, which were sacrifices of thanksgiving and fellowship. Before this verse, the rules detail how the priests and the offerer should share in the sacrificial meal, but here the tone shifts to address severe transgression. The consequence of eating the holy sacrifice while in a state of ritual impurity, specifically from an internal bodily issue or contact with unclean things, is exclusion from the community, highlighting the sanctity of these offerings and God's presence.
This passage is part of a larger instruction on the proper handling of peace offerings, which were sacrifices of thanksgiving and fellowship. Before this verse, the rules detail how the priests and the offerer should share in the sacrificial meal, but here the tone shifts to address severe transgression. The consequence of eating the holy sacrifice while in a state of ritual impurity, specifically from an internal bodily issue or contact with unclean things, is exclusion from the community, highlighting the sanctity of these offerings and God's presence.
"but the person who eats of the flesh of the sacrifice of the LORD’s peace offerings while an uncleanness is on him, that person shall be cut off from his people." — This verse highlights a crucial, often overlooked aspect of worship: "uncleanness" wasn't just about being visibly dirty, but about a state of legal impurity that rendered one unfit to approach God,…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026