Judges 11:15-16
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Jephthah immediately asserts that Israel did not seize land from Moab or Ammon, directly referencing the historical accounts in Numbers and Deuteronomy. This isn't just a historical footnote; it's Jephthah's crucial legal basis to show that Israel possessed the land they currently occupied legitimately and by right of conquest from the Amorites, not by encroaching on their neighbors.
and said to him, “Thus says Jephthah: Israel did not take away the land of Moab or the land of the Ammonites, but when they came up from Egypt, Israel went through the wilderness to the Red Sea and came to Kadesh.
English Standard Version (ESV)
The Ammonites have invaded Israelite territory, prompting Jephthah, the judge of Gilead, to send messengers to the Ammonite king. Jephthah's initial response aims to de-escalate the conflict by questioning the Ammonite claim to the land and reminding them of Israel's history. He argues that Israel conquered the disputed land from the Amorites, not from Moab or Ammon, and did so with God's approval, citing events during the exodus from Egypt.
Jephthah opens his defense not with a sword, but with a sharp legal argument. What exactly does he mean when he says Israel didn't 'take away' land?
When Jephthah states that Israel did not take the land of Moab or Ammon, he's making a crucial distinction based on historical precedent and divine command.
Not All Territory Was the Same
The core of Jephthah's argument here is that Israel's conquest was specific: they took land from the Amorites (led by Sihon), not directly from the Moabites or Ammonites.
Before the battle even begins, Jephthah sends messengers. Why choose words over weapons first, and what does this reveal about his leadership?
Ask a follow-up
Jephthah’s initial response to the Ammonite king isn't immediate aggression. Instead, he engages in diplomacy, a move that speaks volumes about his character and his understanding of leadership.
A Leader for Peace
Understand the original words
Yisra'el · Hebrew Proper Noun
The ancient kingdom of the Israelites. It refers to the people descended from Jacob (renamed Israel), whom God chose as His covenant people to be a light to the nations and through whom the Messiah would come.
midbar · Hebrew Noun
A region of desolate, uncultivated land, often characterized by hardship. In Scripture, it is frequently a place of testing, spiritual formation, and divine provision for God's people.
Yam Suph · Hebrew Proper Noun
The body of water God miraculously divided for the Israelites to cross during the Exodus from Egypt. It serves as a symbol of God's power over creation and His deliverance of His people from slavery.
Jephthah's defense here is rooted in historical precedent and divine promise, arguing that Israel took the land from the Amorites, not from Moab or Ammon, and that this land was given to them by God.
c. 1400 BC
Israel occupies Canaan
Following their exodus from Egypt, the Israelites gradually conquered and settled the land of Canaan.
c. 1300 BC
Amorites occupy Gilead
The Amorites, led by King Sihon, conquered the region east of the Jordan River known as Gilead.
c. 1300 BC
Israel defeats Sihon
During their journey, the Israelites defeated King Sihon and took control of the land he had occupied, which had previously been part of Moab's territory.
c. 1100 BC
Ammonite oppression begins
The Ammonites began to oppress the Israelite tribes living east of the Jordan River, leading to Jephthah's rise as a judge.
c. 1100 BC— this verse
Jephthah negotiates with Ammon
Jephthah, acting as a judge and leader, sent messengers to the Ammonite king to question the cause of the invasion, asserting Israel's rightful possession of the land.
This passage directly states that Israel took possession of the land from Sihon the Amorite, corroborating Jephthah's claim that the land was not taken from Moab or Ammon.
Deuteronomy 2:36This verse recounts Israel's conquest of the territory from Sihon and explicitly mentions that none of it was taken from the land of the children of Ammon, reinforcing Jephthah's argument.
Deuteronomy 2:9This verse instructs Israel not to harass or fight against Moab because they would not be given any of its land, providing a basis for Jephthah's assertion that Moab's land was not taken.
Judges 11:17This verse continues Jephthah's diplomatic message, showing his careful approach by recounting Israel's history of respecting the borders of neighboring nations, which directly relates to his claim in verse 15.
Judges 11:22This verse details Jephthah's reference to Israel's possession of the land of the Amorites, which is the key distinction in his argument about not taking land from Moab or Ammon.
gillJudges 11:15: "And said unto him, Thus saith Jephthah, Israel took not away the land of Moab, nor the land of the children of Ammon:"
And said unto him,.... By his messengers: thus saith Jephthah; in a majestic style, as governor of Israel: Israel took not away the land of Moab, nor the land of the children of Ammon; they were charged not to take any, nor did they take any that belonged to any of these countries, or that was then in the possession of either of them, Deuteronomy 2:9 what they di…
ellicottJudges 11:15: "And said unto him, Thus saith Jephthah, Israel took not away the land of Moab, nor the land of the children of Ammon:"
(15) Took not away the land of Moab . . . —What they took was the territory of Sihon, which they had never been forbidden to take, and had indeed been forced to take by Sihon’s attack on them. It was not likely that they could enter into discussion as ‘to the previous owners of the land.
Jephthah immediately asserts that Israel did not seize land from Moab or Ammon, directly referencing the historical accounts in Numbers and Deuteronomy. This isn't just a historical footnote; it's Jephthah's crucial legal basis to show that Israel possessed the land they currently occupied legitimately and by right of conquest from the Amorites, not by encroaching on their neighbors.
The Ammonites have invaded Israelite territory, prompting Jephthah, the judge of Gilead, to send messengers to the Ammonite king. Jephthah's initial response aims to de-escalate the conflict by questioning the Ammonite claim to the land and reminding them of Israel's history. He argues that Israel conquered the disputed land from the Amorites, not from Moab or Ammon, and did so with God's approval, citing events during the exodus from Egypt.
The Ammonites have invaded Israelite territory, prompting Jephthah, the judge of Gilead, to send messengers to the Ammonite king. Jephthah's initial response aims to de-escalate the conflict by questioning the Ammonite claim to the land and reminding them of Israel's history. He argues that Israel conquered the disputed land from the Amorites, not from Moab or Ammon, and did so with God's approval, citing events during the exodus from Egypt.
"and said to him, “Thus says Jephthah: Israel did not take away the land of Moab or the land of the Ammonites, but when they came up from Egypt, Israel went through the wilderness to the Red Sea and came to Kadesh." — Jephthah immediately asserts that Israel did not seize land from Moab or Ammon, directly referencing the historical accounts in Numbers and Deuteronomy. This isn't just a historical footnote; it's Je…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
