And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
English Standard Version (ESV)
The disciples' question reveals a deeply ingrained, albeit flawed, belief that suffering is always a direct punishment for sin. They immediately jump to assigning blame, assuming either the man himself or his parents must have sinned, overlooking the possibility that God might have other purposes for allowing affliction. This highlights how easily we, like them, can miss God's deeper intentions when we're focused on assigning fault.
And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
English Standard Version (ESV)
As Jesus walked by, he saw a man blind from birth, and his disciples, seeing this man's condition, immediately connected suffering with sin. They asked Jesus if this man's blindness was a punishment for his own sin, or if it was a consequence of his parents' sins. This question reveals a common belief at the time that all suffering was a direct result of specific sins, either the individual's or their parents'.
When we see someone suffering, our first thought is often: 'What sin caused this?' The disciples did too, but Jesus challenged this very idea.
The disciples approached Jesus with a deeply ingrained belief: suffering must be a punishment for sin. Their question, 'who sinned, this man, or his parents?', reveals this assumption. They saw a man born blind and immediately looked for a cause rooted in wrongdoing, either his own (perhaps in a pre-existent state or in the womb, as some Jewish thought suggested) or his parents'. This highlights a common human tendency to seek direct, proportional blame for misfortune, rather than trusting in God's larger purposes.
Jesus reframed the reason for the man's blindness, shifting the focus from sin to God's active, miraculous power.
Jesus' answer, 'Neither did this man sin, nor his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him,' completely overturns the disciples' framework. He clarifies that while suffering can be linked to sin, it's not always a direct, punitive consequence. Instead, Jesus points to a higher purpose: the opportunity for God's 'works'—his power, glory, and compassion—to be revealed. This man's blindness, a profound human tragedy, was chosen by God as a stage for an extraordinary divine intervention, a miracle that would point directly to Him.
Understand the original words
Ask a follow-up
rhabbi · Hebrew/Greek Noun
A title of respect meaning "my great one" or "my master," used to address a teacher of the Jewish law. In the Gospels, it is frequently used to address Jesus, acknowledging His authority as a teacher.
hamartano · Greek Verb
Refers to missing the mark of God's holiness or transgressing His revealed will. Biblically, sin is an alienation from God that affects all of humanity and requires divine atonement.
The disciples' question reflects a prevailing Jewish mindset that suffering was a direct consequence of sin. This verse captures a pivotal moment where Jesus challenges this simplistic view, opening up a deeper understanding of God's purposes in suffering.
Late 8th Century BC
Assyrian Empire Dominates
The Neo-Assyrian Empire, a brutal military power, exerted significant influence over the region, often leading to unrest, deportations, and political instability.
722 BC
Fall of Samaria
The Northern Kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrians, and its people were exiled, leaving a lasting impact on Jewish identity and history.
605 BC
First Babylonian Deportation
Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians began deporting Jewish elites and skilled workers to Babylon, including figures like Daniel, marking the start of the Babylonian Exile.
586 BC
Destruction of Jerusalem
The Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem and the First Temple, leading to a widespread and devastating exile for the remaining Jewish population.
c. 538 BC
Return from Exile
Following Persia's conquest of Babylon, Cyrus the Great allowed the Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple, though many remained in exile.
c. 1st Century AD— this verse
Jewish Interpretations of Suffering
During this period, prominent Jewish thought wrestled with the relationship between sin and suffering, with common views including divine punishment for sin, the sins of parents affecting children, and even ideas of soul transmigration or pre-existence.
This passage speaks to the idea that the sins of parents can have consequences for their children, a concept the disciples are grappling with in their question about the man born blind.
Job 1:1-22Job's suffering, like the man's blindness, raises questions about sin and divine justice, though Job's story ultimately reveals that suffering is not always a direct punishment for personal sin.
Luke 13:1-5In this passage, Jesus directly addresses the idea that suffering is always a punishment for sin, countering the popular assumption that calamities befall individuals because of their specific transgressions or those of their parents.
Romans 5:12This verse establishes the universal reality of sin entering the world through one man, which provides a backdrop for understanding that all humanity, including infants, are affected by sin's consequences.
1 Peter 4:17Peter reminds believers that judgment often begins with the household of God, suggesting that suffering can sometimes be a refining process within God's people, rather than solely a punitive measure for sin.
calvinJohn 9:1-5: "And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth."
- And Jesus, passing by, saw a man blind from his birth. 2. And his disciples asked him, saying, Rabbi, who hath sinned, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? 3. Jesus answered, Neither did this man sin, nor his parents; but that the works of God may be displayed in him. 4. I must work the works of him who sent me, while it is day; the night cometh, when no man can work. 5. While I am in the world, I…
gillJohn 9:2: "And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?"
And his disciples asked him,.... It may be that some of the twelve apostles, or others of his disciples, might put the following question to him on sight of this blind man, who by some means or another knew was born blind: saying, master, who did man, or his parents, that he was born blind? the first of these questions, whether the man himself had sinned before he was born, wh…
The disciples' question reveals a deeply ingrained, albeit flawed, belief that suffering is always a direct punishment for sin. They immediately jump to assigning blame, assuming either the man himself or his parents must have sinned, overlooking the possibility that God might have other purposes for allowing affliction. This highlights how easily we, like them, can miss God's deeper intentions when we're focused on assigning fault.
As Jesus walked by, he saw a man blind from birth, and his disciples, seeing this man's condition, immediately connected suffering with sin. They asked Jesus if this man's blindness was a punishment for his own sin, or if it was a consequence of his parents' sins. This question reveals a common belief at the time that all suffering was a direct result of specific sins, either the individual's or their parents'.
As Jesus walked by, he saw a man blind from birth, and his disciples, seeing this man's condition, immediately connected suffering with sin. They asked Jesus if this man's blindness was a punishment for his own sin, or if it was a consequence of his parents' sins. This question reveals a common belief at the time that all suffering was a direct result of specific sins, either the individual's or their parents'.
"And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”" — The disciples' question reveals a deeply ingrained, albeit flawed, belief that suffering is always a direct punishment for sin. They immediately jump to assigning blame, assuming either the man himse…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026