Galatians 3:21
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Paul asks if the Law is against God's promises, but then clarifies that the Law simply couldn't grant life even if it tried. If the Law had the power to give life, then yes, righteousness would come through it, but that's precisely where its limitations lie – it's not life-giving.
Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Paul is addressing the concern that the Mosaic Law might contradict or invalidate God's earlier promises to Abraham. He's clarifying that the Law was never meant to be a path to life or righteousness on its own, but rather a temporary measure to reveal sin and point toward the fulfillment found in Christ. Therefore, the Law and the promises work together, not in opposition, to bring about salvation through faith.
Does the Law of Moses contradict God's promises? Paul shouts a resounding 'No!' But if not, what was the Law for?
Paul addresses a potential misunderstanding: that the Law, given through Moses, somehow canceled out or stood against the promises God made to Abraham. He emphatically rejects this idea with a passionate "God forbid!" He then clarifies the Law's role by posing a hypothetical: if the Law could have given life, then righteousness would indeed come through it.
A Law That Could Give Life?
The core of Paul's argument here is that the Law, in itself, was never designed to be the source of life and righteousness. The scholars point out that the Law is good, pure, and just. However, it doesn't have the ability to give life. It reveals sin, makes us aware of our transgressions, and shows us our guilt (as Calvin and others note). It highlights what we should do, but it doesn't give us the power to actually do it perfectly or to overcome our sinful nature.
Preparing the Way
Instead of contradicting the promise, the Law was added because of transgressions (Galatians 3:19). It acted like a tutor, a schoolmaster, or a guide, preparing people to see their need for the promise found in Christ. By revealing their inability to keep its commands perfectly and the consequences of their sin, the Law pointed them towards the need for God's gracious intervention through faith in Jesus.
Ask a follow-up
Why couldn't the Law itself bring life and righteousness, even if it was good?
Paul's rhetorical question in verse 21 hinges on a crucial distinction: the Law's inability to bestow life. He argues that if the Law possessed the power to give life, then righteousness would indeed flow from it. But the reality is, it doesn't have that power.
The Nature of Law
The commentaries consistently highlight that law, by its very nature, demands obedience and prescribes consequences. It can reveal imperfection and condemn transgression, but it cannot impart the life that obedience requires or forgive the sin that breaks it. As Meyer points out, the life referred to is the eternal, Messianic life, which is the inheritance promised, not just moral quickening.
The Promise's Unique Role
In contrast, the promise made to Abraham, and fulfilled in Christ, is the source of life and righteousness through faith. The Law shows us our desperate need; the Promise (through Christ) provides the solution. The Law shows the condition for life (perfect obedience), which we cannot meet. The Promise bypasses our inability by offering life as a gift received by faith. Therefore, the Law and the Promise aren't rivals; the Law reveals the problem that only the solution found in the Promise can fix.
Understand the original words
nomos · Greek Noun
A divine rule or system of regulations, often referring to the Mosaic law given at Sinai, which serves to reveal God's standard of holiness and human sinfulness but cannot provide salvation.
epaggelia · Greek Noun
A declaration or oath of God expressing His gracious commitment to act on behalf of His people, culminating in the fulfillment found in Christ.
dikaiosynē · Greek Noun
A state of moral uprightness or conformity to God's standard; in the New Testament, it is often used as a status given to believers by God through faith in Christ rather than by works.
The tension Paul addresses in Galatia arises from the historical context where the Law, given after Abraham's promise, was seen by some as the primary means of righteousness, creating a perceived conflict with God's earlier, faith-based promise.
c. 1446 BC
Giving of the Mosaic Law
God gives the Law, including the Ten Commandments, to the Israelites through Moses at Mount Sinai, establishing a covenant relationship with them.
c. 1446 BC - c. 4 BC
The Law Era
The period during which the Mosaic Law governed Israelite life, intended to reveal sin and guide behavior, but ultimately unable to provide righteousness or eternal life on its own.
c. 4 BC - c. AD 30
Jesus' Earthly Ministry
Jesus Christ, the promised Seed, fulfills the Law and the promises made to Abraham, demonstrating God's plan of salvation through faith.
c. AD 48-55— this verse
Paul's Ministry and Letters
The Apostle Paul travels, plants churches, and writes letters, including Galatians, to address theological issues, particularly the relationship between the Law and faith in Christ.
This passage directly addresses the purpose of the law in relation to sin, stating 'the law would not know sin except through the law.' This highlights Paul's argument that the law's function is to reveal sin, not to provide life or righteousness itself.
Romans 3:20This verse states, 'For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight.' This strongly supports the idea in Galatians 3:21 that righteousness cannot be obtained through the law, as it was never designed to provide life.
Romans 8:3-4Here, Paul explains that God condemned sin in the flesh by sending his own Son 'so that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us.' This shows that the law's true purpose is met through Christ, not through human adherence to it for justification.
Hebrews 7:11This verse discusses the inadequacy of the Levitical priesthood for achieving perfection, stating, 'Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood... what further need would there have been for another priest?' This parallels the argument that if the law could provide life and righteousness, the promise through Christ would be unnecessary.
vincentGalatians 3:21: "Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law."
Against the promises (κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν)Does it follow from the difference between the law and the promises that they are in antagonism? Paul supposes this objection on the part of a Jewish Christian.God forbid (μὴ γένοιτο)See on Romans 3:4. This could only be true in case the law gave life, for life m…
barnesGalatians 3:21: "Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law."
Is the law then against the promises of God? - Is the Law of Moses to be regarded as opposed to the promises made to Abraham? Does this follow from any view which can be taken of the subject? The object of the apostle in asking this question is, evidently, to take an opportunity to deny in the most positive ma…
Paul asks if the Law is against God's promises, but then clarifies that the Law simply couldn't grant life even if it tried. If the Law had the power to give life, then yes, righteousness would come through it, but that's precisely where its limitations lie – it's not life-giving.
Paul is addressing the concern that the Mosaic Law might contradict or invalidate God's earlier promises to Abraham. He's clarifying that the Law was never meant to be a path to life or righteousness on its own, but rather a temporary measure to reveal sin and point toward the fulfillment found in Christ. Therefore, the Law and the promises work together, not in opposition, to bring about salvation through faith.
Paul is addressing the concern that the Mosaic Law might contradict or invalidate God's earlier promises to Abraham. He's clarifying that the Law was never meant to be a path to life or righteousness on its own, but rather a temporary measure to reveal sin and point toward the fulfillment found in Christ. Therefore, the Law and the promises work together, not in opposition, to bring about salvation through faith.
"Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law." — Paul asks if the Law is against God's promises, but then clarifies that the Law simply couldn't grant life even if it tried. If the Law had the power to give life, then yes, righteousness would…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
