Daniel 11:15
Then the king of the north shall come and throw up siegeworks and take a well-fortified city. And the forces of the south shall not stand, or even his best troops, for there shall be no strength to stand.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Daniel 11:15
Then the king of the north shall come and throw up siegeworks and take a well-fortified city. And the forces of the south shall not stand, or even his best troops, for there shall be no strength to stand.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's truly striking here is the profound helplessness of the southern forces; it's not just that they "couldn't stand," but that there was "no strength to stand." This isn't just a military defeat, but an utter collapse of their ability to resist, showing how thoroughly the northern king’s advance was unstoppable.
Following a period where Egypt had gained territory, the Syrian king, Antiochus the Great, returns to reclaim these lands. He decisively defeats the Egyptian general Scopas and relentlessly pursues him to the strongly fortified city of Sidon. Despite Egypt's efforts to send reinforcements and their best troops, they are utterly unable to resist Antiochus's advance and the fall of the city.
How did ancient armies break through seemingly impenetrable defenses? This verse paints a vivid picture of military might.
Discover the 'how' behind Antiochus's victory.
The verse mentions the king of the north casting up a "mount" and taking "well-fortified cities." This points to a common ancient military tactic: siege warfare.
The Siege Mound
The "mount" (or siege ramp) was a crucial tool. Soldiers would pile earth, stones, and wood against a city's walls, gradually building a ramp. Once the ramp reached the height of the walls, attackers could pour over them, or use it to bring battering rams and siege towers to bear directly on the fortifications.
Overcoming Defenses
"Well-fortified cities" implies strong walls, towers, and strategic locations. The ability to overcome these wasn't just about brute force, but also about engineering, persistence, and psychological pressure. The famine mentioned in historical accounts of Sidon's fall is another tactic – starving the city into submission.
This wasn't just a random conquest; it was a calculated display of military engineering and strategic dominance.
It's not just about winning; it's about crushing the enemy's best. This verse highlights a total collapse of resistance.
What does it mean when even the 'chosen people' can't stand?
The verse states, "And the forces of the south shall not stand, or even his best troops, for there shall be no strength to stand." This isn't just a minor setback for the southern forces; it's a complete annihilation of their ability to resist.
The "Arms of the South"
This refers to the military power of the king of the south (Ptolemy). It encompassed everything from common soldiers to seasoned commanders.
The "Chosen People"
This points to the elite, the best-trained, most experienced soldiers – the ones you'd expect to hold the line. Their inability to stand signifies a devastating military failure.
Understand the original words
solelah · Hebrew Noun
Structures or ramparts built by an army to besiege and eventually capture a city. Symbolically, it represents the instruments of warfare used to overcome human defenses.
mivtsar · Hebrew Noun
A location protected by walls or strong defenses. Biblically, this can refer to literal cities or metaphorically to the trust people place in human power rather than in God.
200 BC
Antiochus the Great Retakes Regions
After Ptolemaic general Scopas gained control of Judea and Coelo-Syria, Antiochus the Great launched a campaign to reclaim these territories for the Seleucid Empire.
198 BC
Battle of Panias
Antiochus the Great decisively defeated Scopas's forces near the Jordan River. This victory shifted the balance of power back to the Seleucids.
198 BC— this verse
Siege and Fall of Sidon
Scopas retreated with remaining forces to the fortified city of Sidon, where Antiochus besieged him. After a prolonged siege, famine forced Scopas to surrender.
197-195 BC
Antiochus Consolidates Control
Following the victory at Sidon, Antiochus the Great secured his rule over Judea and other former Ptolemaic territories, solidifying Seleucid dominance in the region.
This passage echoes the theme of a powerful northern king boasting of his conquests and the ease with which he overthrows nations, similar to the overwhelming victory described in Daniel 11:15.
Jeremiah 49:19-22This prophecy against Edom describes a swift and unstoppable invasion, likening the invader to a lion emerging from the Jordan, which parallels the decisive and overwhelming advance of the 'king of the north' in Daniel.
Ezekiel 30:20-22This passage speaks of God breaking the arms of Egypt and its allies, declaring that no strength will be able to stand against the invader, directly mirroring the helplessness of the 'king of the south' described in Daniel 11:15.
1 Samuel 17:42-47While a different context, this story highlights the theme of a seemingly invincible foe (Goliath) being overcome by a force that appears inferior, offering a spiritual counterpoint to the overwhelming military might depicted in Daniel 11:15.
ellicottDaniel 11:15: "So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand."
(15) The king of the north.— This prince attacks the fortress of his rival, who is unable to resist him. Here it is supposed that the allusion is to the capture of Sidon by Antiochus the Great. The troops of Ptolemy under Scopas had acquired possession of Jerusalem an…
jfbDaniel 11:15: "So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand."
- king of … north—Antiochus the Great.take … fenced cities—Scopas, the Egyptian general, met Antiochus at Paneas, near the sources of the Jordan, and was defeated, and fled to Sidon, a strongly "fenced city," where he was forced to surrender.chosen people—Egypt's ch…
What's truly striking here is the profound helplessness of the southern forces; it's not just that they "couldn't stand," but that there was "no strength to stand." This isn't just a military defeat, but an utter collapse of their ability to resist, showing how thoroughly the northern king’s advance was unstoppable.
Following a period where Egypt had gained territory, the Syrian king, Antiochus the Great, returns to reclaim these lands. He decisively defeats the Egyptian general Scopas and relentlessly pursues him to the strongly fortified city of Sidon. Despite Egypt's efforts to send reinforcements and their best troops, they are utterly unable to resist Antiochus's advance and the fall of the city.
Following a period where Egypt had gained territory, the Syrian king, Antiochus the Great, returns to reclaim these lands. He decisively defeats the Egyptian general Scopas and relentlessly pursues him to the strongly fortified city of Sidon. Despite Egypt's efforts to send reinforcements and their best troops, they are utterly unable to resist Antiochus's advance and the fall of the city.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Daniel 11:15 is available in the Sola app.
No Strength to Stand
The repeated phrase "no strength to stand" emphasizes the totality of the defeat. It wasn't just that they lost a battle; their military capacity was so thoroughly broken that they were rendered powerless. This sets the stage for the king of the north's unchecked advance.
"Then the king of the north shall come and throw up siegeworks and take a well-fortified city. And the forces of the south shall not stand, or even his best troops, for there shall be no strength to stand." — What's truly striking here is the profound helplessness of the southern forces; it's not just that they "couldn't stand," but that there was "no strength to stand." This isn't just a military defeat,…