Abraham bought a burial plot, but it wasn't his inheritance. What's the difference, and why does it matter?
Stephen highlights a crucial distinction in Acts 7:5: Abraham didn't receive an "inheritance" in the land, not even a place to stand. However, God promised it to him as a "possession." The purchase of the cave of Machpelah (Genesis 23) was a necessary transaction for immediate needs, but it wasn't the fulfillment of God's promise of a permanent, divinely-given inheritance for his descendants. This purchase, made with Abraham's own money, underscores that he was a sojourner, not yet a resident landowner in the sense God intended. The promise of possession was a future reality, a gift from God, distinct from any earthly transactions.
Think of it this way: an inheritance is a gift passed down, something you receive by divine right or family connection. A possession, in this context, is what you hold and control, potentially through purchase or other means. God's promise to Abraham was about a future, divinely-ordained inheritance, not just a temporary holding.
- No Foot's Length: This phrase emphasizes the complete lack of any land ownership granted directly by God during Abraham's lifetime. It wasn't just a small plot; it was nothing. This starkly contrasts with the future, vast inheritance promised.