But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean.” And the voice came to him again a second time, “What God has made clean, do not call common.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
Peter's emphatic "By no means, Lord!" reveals how deeply ingrained the Mosaic food laws were; he saw "common or unclean" not just as a dietary distinction but as a fundamental boundary separating God's people from the rest of the world. This shows his earnest obedience, even if it meant misunderstanding God's unfolding plan for inclusion.
But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean.” And the voice came to him again a second time, “What God has made clean, do not call common.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
Peter is in a trance, experiencing a vision where a great sheet filled with all sorts of animals, some forbidden by the Mosaic Law, is lowered from heaven. A voice commands him to "Rise, Peter; kill and eat," to which Peter strongly objects, citing his lifelong adherence to the Law's dietary restrictions. This vision and Peter's immediate, deeply ingrained reaction reveal the profound cultural and religious barriers between Jews and Gentiles that the early church was just beginning to confront.
Peter, the impetuous disciple, is faced with a divine vision that challenges his deeply ingrained religious practices. His immediate, strong reaction reveals a profound respect for God's law, even when it conflicts with a heavenly command.
Peter's Loyalty to the Law
Peter's immediate response, “By no means, Lord,” isn't a sign of defiance, but of deep-seated obedience. He was trained from birth to distinguish between clean and unclean foods according to the Mosaic Law. For him, eating anything “common or unclean” was a direct violation of God's commands.
This highlights how powerfully religious and cultural practices can shape our understanding of God's will. Peter's life was so steeped in the Law that he couldn't immediately reconcile the vision with his lifelong convictions. It's a powerful reminder that even sincere followers can struggle when God calls them beyond their familiar boundaries.
The vision of animals presented Peter with a wordplay on 'common' and 'unclean.' What did these terms truly mean in this context, and why did they evoke such a strong reaction?
More Than Just Food Laws
The terms "common" and "unclean" carried significant weight for Peter. "Unclean" directly referred to the specific animals forbidden by the Law of Moses (Leviticus 11). But "common" had a broader implication. It could mean "profane" or "ordinary" – things not set apart for God's specific use, and by extension, things associated with the Gentile world.
Ask a follow-up
For Peter, these distinctions weren't just about diet; they were markers of identity and separation between Jews and Gentiles. To eat "common" or "unclean" food meant crossing a line that had been divinely established to set Israel apart. The vision challenged this fundamental understanding, hinting that these boundaries might be shifting.
The voice from heaven gently corrects Peter, revealing a divine redefinition of what is clean. This shift is not arbitrary but is foundational to the gospel's expansion.
Divine Authority Over Law
God's response, "What God has made clean, do not call common," is the pivotal moment. It's not Peter's personal preference or understanding of the Law that holds ultimate authority, but God's declaration. The vision was teaching Peter that God was about to declare the Gentiles spiritually clean, through Christ, making them acceptable to Him, just as clean food was acceptable under the Law.
This vision was a radical step towards breaking down the wall between Jew and Gentile. It prepared Peter, and by extension the early church, to embrace the incredible truth that God's salvation is for everyone, regardless of their background or the ceremonial laws they observed. It’s a profound lesson that God’s definition of clean goes far beyond dietary restrictions; it encompasses all people He calls to Himself.
Understand the original words
koinos · Greek Adjective
Refers to anything that is ordinary, profane, or mundane, lacking the status of being set apart for God's holy service. In a Jewish ritual context, it often denotes that which is accessible to the public and not restricted by purity laws.
akathartos · Greek Adjective
In the Old Testament, this refers to that which is ceremonially polluted, defiled, or unfit for sacred use or consumption according to the Levitical laws. It denotes a state of ritual impurity that separates a person or thing from the presence of a holy God.
kyrios · Greek Noun
Derived from the Greek word 'kyrios', this title indicates supreme authority, ownership, and lordship. In the New Testament, it is used as a confession of Christ's divinity and sovereignty over the believer's life.
katharizō · Greek Verb
To be declared ceremonially pure, consecrated, or set apart for God's use. It signifies the removal of defilement, allowing something or someone to enter into the presence of the Holy God.
Peter's firm but immediate refusal highlights how deeply ingrained the Mosaic dietary laws were, even for the apostles. This event was a crucial step in God's plan to reveal that salvation through Christ was for all people, Jew and Gentile alike, breaking down centuries of religious and social barriers.
c. 1400 BC
Mosaic Law Given
The Law given through Moses establishes strict dietary laws, distinguishing between 'clean' and 'unclean' animals. This marked a significant separation between Israelites and surrounding Gentile nations.
c. 70 AD
Destruction of the Temple
The destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans marks the end of the sacrificial system and a pivotal moment in Jewish history, leading to a greater emphasis on rabbinic interpretation of the Law.
Early 1st Century AD
Jesus' Ministry and Teachings
Jesus himself challenged some interpretations of purity laws, stating that what goes into a person's mouth does not defile them (Mark 7:15), though the full implications for Jewish-Gentile relations were not immediately grasped by all disciples.
c. AD 30-33
Pentecost and the Early Church
The coming of the Holy Spirit empowers the apostles, but the early church, centered in Jerusalem, largely continues to adhere to Jewish customs, including dietary laws and the separation from Gentiles.
c. AD 40-45
Paul's Ministry Begins
Saul of Tarsus, now the Apostle Paul, begins his ministry to the Gentiles, facing significant opposition from within the Jewish community and necessitating clarification on the inclusion of non-Jews into the faith.
c. AD 49
Jerusalem Council
A major council is held in Jerusalem to address the issue of Gentile inclusion. The decision is made that Gentiles do not need to be circumcised or follow all Mosaic laws, but they should abstain from certain practices.
c. AD 41
Cornelius' Vision
Cornelius, a devout Roman centurion, receives a vision from an angel instructing him to send for Peter.
This passage lays out the dietary laws that distinguished Israel from other nations, establishing the very categories of 'clean' and 'unclean' that Peter is adhering to in Acts 10.
Matthew 15:11Jesus declared that what goes into a person's mouth does not defile them, directly challenging the old distinctions Peter is still holding onto.
Mark 7:19Jesus pronounced all foods clean, a foundational teaching that Peter, in this moment, has not yet fully grasped in its implications for his interaction with Gentiles.
Galatians 2:11-14This passage shows Peter later acting hypocritically by separating himself from Gentile believers, demonstrating the struggle to fully embrace the implications of the Gospel breaking down those divisions.
Ephesians 2:14Paul explains that Christ abolished the law of commandments and ordinances, which included the dietary laws, thereby breaking down the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles.
ellicottActs 10:14: "But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean."
(14) Not so, Lord . . . —The emphatic resistance even to a voice from heaven is strikingly in harmony with the features of St. Peter’s character, as portrayed in the Gospels, with the “Be it far from thee, Lord,” when he heard of the coming Passion ( Matthew 16:22 ), with “Thou shalt never wash my feet,” in John 13:8 . He had been taught that that which “goeth into the mouth cannot defile the…
jfbActs 10:14: "But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean."
- Not so, Lord—See Marginal reference.I have never eaten anything that is common—that is, not sanctified by divine permission to eat of it, and so "unclean." "The distinction of meats was a sacrament of national distinction, separation, and consecration" [Webster and Wilkinson].
Peter's emphatic "By no means, Lord!" reveals how deeply ingrained the Mosaic food laws were; he saw "common or unclean" not just as a dietary distinction but as a fundamental boundary separating God's people from the rest of the world. This shows his earnest obedience, even if it meant misunderstanding God's unfolding plan for inclusion.
Peter is in a trance, experiencing a vision where a great sheet filled with all sorts of animals, some forbidden by the Mosaic Law, is lowered from heaven. A voice commands him to "Rise, Peter; kill and eat," to which Peter strongly objects, citing his lifelong adherence to the Law's dietary restrictions. This vision and Peter's immediate, deeply ingrained reaction reveal the profound cultural and religious barriers between Jews and Gentiles that the early church was just beginning to confront.
Peter is in a trance, experiencing a vision where a great sheet filled with all sorts of animals, some forbidden by the Mosaic Law, is lowered from heaven. A voice commands him to "Rise, Peter; kill and eat," to which Peter strongly objects, citing his lifelong adherence to the Law's dietary restrictions. This vision and Peter's immediate, deeply ingrained reaction reveal the profound cultural and religious barriers between Jews and Gentiles that the early church was just beginning to confront.
"But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean.” And the voice came to him again a second time, “What God has made clean, do not call common.”" — Peter's emphatic "By no means, Lord!" reveals how deeply ingrained the Mosaic food laws were; he saw "common or unclean" not just as a dietary distinction but as a fundamental boundary separating God…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026