Romans 4:14
For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
If the promise of inheritance is tied to following the Law, then faith becomes meaningless and the promise itself is canceled out. The verse highlights that faith and adherence to law are mutually exclusive paths to God's promises; you can't have both working for you.
Paul is arguing that Abraham was declared righteous by faith, not by following the Law, and that this promise of being heir of the world was also based on faith. If people could become heirs simply by adhering to the Law, then faith would be useless, and God's promise to Abraham would be meaningless and canceled out. This establishes that the promise could not have come through the Law, because the Law's effect is wrath, not inheritance by grace.
What happens when we try to earn God's promises through our own efforts? Paul says it breaks everything.
Paul lays out a stark contrast here: if heirship (inheriting God's promises) comes through law, then faith becomes useless and the promise is nullified. Think of it like this: promises are built on trust and a giver's word. If you try to earn that promise through your own performance (following the law perfectly), you're essentially saying you don't need the promise or the giver's grace. You're trying to build your own bridge to the promise, rather than accepting the bridge God already built through faith.
Paul doesn't just say the law doesn't lead to promises; he says it leads to the opposite.
Paul is clear: the law’s natural outcome isn't blessing, but wrath. Why? Because the law reveals God’s perfect standard, and we, in our fallen state, fall short. The more we're exposed to the law, the more we see our sin and our inability to meet its demands. This exposure doesn't bring us closer to God; it highlights our guilt and separation from Him.
This verse speaks directly to the tension present throughout Israel's history: the promise of inheritance was given to Abraham by faith long before the Law existed. To claim that inheritance now depends on adhering to the Law would negate the very foundation of faith and God's promise.
c. 1446 BC
The Giving of the Law at Sinai
God gives the Mosaic Law to the Israelites through Moses, establishing a covenant relationship based on obedience to these statutes. This event forms the foundation for those who later rely on the Law for righteousness.
c. 1400 BC - 722 BC
Periods of Israelite History
Throughout the history of Israel, from the conquest of Canaan to the fall of the Northern Kingdom, the Law was central to their national and religious identity. However, repeated disobedience led to cycles of judgment.
c. 722 BC
Fall of the Northern Kingdom
The Assyrian Empire conquers the Northern Kingdom of Israel, scattering its people. This event serves as a stark warning about the consequences of national unfaithfulness to God's Law.
586 BC
Fall of Jerusalem and Babylonian Exile
The Southern Kingdom of Judah falls to the Babylonians, its Temple is destroyed, and many of its people are exiled. This is seen as a consequence of persistent failure to uphold the Law.
This passage directly echoes the sentiment that those who rely on the law are under a curse, implying that faith and reliance on law are mutually exclusive paths to God's favor.
Galatians 3:18This verse highlights the contrast between inheritance through the law and inheritance through promise, reinforcing Paul's argument that the latter (received by faith) is the true way Abraham's heirs receive God's blessings.
Romans 3:27-28It directly contrasts the boasting that arises from works of the law with the absence of boasting when salvation comes through faith, underscoring why a law-based inheritance would nullify faith.
Romans 9:31-32This passage explains how Israel failed to achieve righteousness and heirship because they pursued it through the law rather than through faith in Christ, mirroring the core argument in Romans 4:14.
Hebrews 7:18-19This passage speaks of the setting aside of a former commandment because it did not lead to perfection, which parallels Paul's point that the law, by its very nature, cannot bring about the promised inheritance, thus making faith void if it were the basis.
cambridgeRomans 4:14: "For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:"
14 . of the law ] Lit. out of the law . On the Gr. construction see on Romans 3:26 ( ad finem ).—“ Law ” here is without article, and possibly its reference is general; q. d. “If those who in any sense claim on grounds of a law , &c.” But it is far better to read (in English ) “ the law.” The lack of the article is quite natural where the thing is conspicuous and well known. heirs…
meyerRomans 4:14: "For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:"
Romans 4:14 . Here also νόμος is not (as Flatt and others take it) the moral law (to which however the saying may certainly be applied ), but the law of Moses , viewed in excluding antithesis to the πίστις . By οἱ ἐκ νόμου , “those of the law” (Luther), are meant those who belong to the law, are as such subjected to it; consequently the Jews at all events, but just so far as they a…
If the promise of inheritance is tied to following the Law, then faith becomes meaningless and the promise itself is canceled out. The verse highlights that faith and adherence to law are mutually exclusive paths to God's promises; you can't have both working for you.
Paul is arguing that Abraham was declared righteous by faith, not by following the Law, and that this promise of being heir of the world was also based on faith. If people could become heirs simply by adhering to the Law, then faith would be useless, and God's promise to Abraham would be meaningless and canceled out. This establishes that the promise could not have come through the Law, because the Law's effect is wrath, not inheritance by grace.
Paul is arguing that Abraham was declared righteous by faith, not by following the Law, and that this promise of being heir of the world was also based on faith. If people could become heirs simply by adhering to the Law, then faith would be useless, and God's promise to Abraham would be meaningless and canceled out. This establishes that the promise could not have come through the Law, because the Law's effect is wrath, not inheritance by grace.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Romans 4:14 is available in the Sola app.
c. 515 BC
Dedication of the Second Temple
After the return from exile, the Second Temple is dedicated, marking a renewal of Israelite worship and a desire to adhere to the Law. Yet, the struggle between reliance on the Law and faith persists.
c. 4 BC - AD 30/33
Life and Ministry of Jesus Christ
Jesus, the Messiah, arrives, fulfilling the Law and offering salvation through faith, not adherence to legal works. His ministry highlights the inadequacy of the Law for justification.
c. AD 57— this verse
Paul Writes Romans
Paul, writing from Corinth, addresses the church in Rome, a diverse community of Jewish and Gentile believers. He lays out his theology of salvation by grace through faith in Christ, countering any notion that adherence to the Law grants inheritance.
"For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void." — If the promise of inheritance is tied to following the Law, then faith becomes meaningless and the promise itself is canceled out. The verse highlights that faith and adherence to law are mutually ex…
