Proverbs 6:30-32
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This verse highlights a surprising point of empathy: society's judgment is softened when a thief is driven by extreme hunger, seeing necessity rather than malice. This pity, however, doesn't negate the need for restitution, contrasting sharply with the unforgivable folly of adultery, which lacks even this excuse of desperate need.
People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy his appetite when he is hungry, but if he is caught, he will pay sevenfold; he will give all the goods of his house. He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who does it destroys himself.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This passage is part of a longer section where Solomon warns his son against the dangers of adultery. He uses the stark example of the "neighbor's wife" to illustrate the severe consequences of this sin, contrasting it with less extreme offenses like theft driven by hunger. The verses preceding and following this one emphasize that while theft has consequences, the betrayal of adultery is far more destructive and unforgivable.
Why would anyone not despise a thief? Isn't stealing always wrong? This verse suggests there's a distinction worth understanding.
Proverbs 6:30 points out that society often views a thief driven by extreme hunger differently than other criminals.
A Matter of Motivation
The core idea here is why the theft occurs. When someone is literally starving and steals only what's needed to survive, there's a level of understanding, even pity, from onlookers. It's seen as a desperate act of self-preservation, not a malicious intent to harm or to gain illicit wealth.
Not an Excuse, But a Context
This doesn't mean the theft is condoned or legal. The context of Proverbs 6 immediately contrasts this with adultery, highlighting that even this 'lesser' crime has consequences (like restitution, as mentioned in verses 30-31). But the despising—the deep contempt and reproach—is softened by the recognition of dire need.
The thief might get a pitying glance, but the adulterer earns something far worse. What makes this sin so much more contemptible?
Proverbs 6:30-33 draws a sharp contrast between the thief driven by hunger and the adulterer. While the thief is a product of circumstance, the adulterer is presented as someone who fundamentally 'lacketh understanding.'
Beyond Physical Need
Ask a follow-up
Stealing out of hunger addresses a basic physical need. Adultery, however, stems from a corrupted heart and a failure of moral reasoning. It's a choice that disregards profound responsibilities, loyalty, and the sanctity of relationships.
A Greater Destruction
The passage implies that the consequences for adultery are far more severe, not just legally but relationally and spiritually. Unlike the thief who might face restitution, the adulterer brings shame, destruction, and a reproach that is difficult to erase. It's a sin that doesn't just steal property; it destroys trust, families, and ultimately, the soul.
Understand the original words
gannab · Hebrew Noun
One who takes property belonging to another without permission. In biblical law, theft is a violation of the commandment to love one's neighbor and respect property, though it is viewed through different lenses depending on the necessity of the thief.
nephesh · Hebrew Noun
The physical or metaphorical desire or craving of a person. It refers to the basic human drive for sustenance or satisfaction, which, if left uncontrolled, can lead to sinful behavior.
shalam · Hebrew Verb
In biblical law and wisdom, to pay or restore something, often implying the concept of restitution for a wrong committed. The number seven is frequently associated with completeness or the intensity of the penalty required to satisfy justice.
hon · Hebrew Noun
A general term referring to material possessions, wealth, or substance. In the context of wisdom literature, it represents the fruits of one's labor or the resources God has provided to an individual.
na'aph · Hebrew Verb
Sexual relations between a married person and someone other than their spouse, considered a serious sin against God, the covenant of marriage, and one’s neighbor. It is treated in Proverbs as a betrayal of trust and a violation of divine wisdom.
chasar-leb · Hebrew Noun phrase
A phrase denoting a deficiency of heart or understanding; it implies a failure to grasp divine wisdom or the fatal consequences of one's sinful actions. The "heart" in Hebrew thought is the center of the intellect, will, and moral decision-making.
This passage outlines the legal requirement for restitution for theft, showing that even a thief stealing out of necessity wasn't excused from making amends, though the punishment might differ from other forms of theft.
Luke 10:30-37The parable of the Good Samaritan highlights compassion for someone in distress, even if they might have erred in their circumstances, mirroring the pity shown to the hungry thief.
Matthew 5:2-12Jesus pronounces blessings on the poor in spirit and those who mourn, suggesting a divine perspective that acknowledges hardship and suffering, aligning with the understanding that extreme need can lead to desperate actions.
1 Samuel 20:1This verse shows a deep personal bond where one character (Jonathan) explicitly states he would risk his life for his friend David, contrasting with the betrayal inherent in adultery and highlighting the value of loyalty and genuine connection.
bensonProverbs 6:30: "Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry;"
Proverbs 6:30-35. Men do not despise a thief — That is, abhor or reproach him, but rather pity and pardon him, who is urged by mere necessity to these practices, but the adulterer is abhorred by all. If he — The thief; be found, he shall restore seven-fold — The law ( Exodus 22:1-4 ) did not oblige the thief to restore seven-fold, but only five oxen for one, or in another case double. Some persons th…
clarkeProverbs 6:30: "Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry;"
Men do not despise a thief if he steal - Every man pities the poor culprit who was perishing for lack of food, and stole to satisfy his hunger; yet no law clears him: he is bound to make restitution; in some cases double, in others quadruple and quintuple; and if he have not property enough to make restitution, to be sold for a bondsman; Exodus 22:1-4 ; Leviticus 25:39 .
This verse highlights a surprising point of empathy: society's judgment is softened when a thief is driven by extreme hunger, seeing necessity rather than malice. This pity, however, doesn't negate the need for restitution, contrasting sharply with the unforgivable folly of adultery, which lacks even this excuse of desperate need.
This passage is part of a longer section where Solomon warns his son against the dangers of adultery. He uses the stark example of the "neighbor's wife" to illustrate the severe consequences of this sin, contrasting it with less extreme offenses like theft driven by hunger. The verses preceding and following this one emphasize that while theft has consequences, the betrayal of adultery is far more destructive and unforgivable.
This passage is part of a longer section where Solomon warns his son against the dangers of adultery. He uses the stark example of the "neighbor's wife" to illustrate the severe consequences of this sin, contrasting it with less extreme offenses like theft driven by hunger. The verses preceding and following this one emphasize that while theft has consequences, the betrayal of adultery is far more destructive and unforgivable.
"People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy his appetite when he is hungry, but if he is caught, he will pay sevenfold; he will give all the goods of his house. He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who…" — This verse highlights a surprising point of empathy: society's judgment is softened when a thief is driven by extreme hunger, seeing necessity rather than malice. This pity, however, doesn't negate t…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
