Numbers 21:26
For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab and taken all his land out of his hand, as far as the Arnon.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This verse isn't just stating a historical fact; it's framing the Israelites' conquest as a reclamation. By highlighting that Sihon, the Amorite king, had taken Heshbon and the surrounding land from a former Moabite king, Moses shows that this territory wasn't rightfully Sihon's to begin with. It's like saying, "This land was stolen once, and now it's being justly reclaimed."
Just before this verse, Israel had requested peaceful passage through Sihon's land and was brutally denied, leading to a war where Israel conquered him and took his territory. This verse explains why Israel was justified in taking this land: Heshbon and the surrounding area weren't originally Sihon's, but had been forcefully seized by him from the Moabites years before. This historical context clarifies that Israel wasn't taking land from its rightful owners, but rather reclaiming territory that Sihon himself had unjustly acquired.
Ever wonder how land changes hands in the Bible? It wasn't always a clean slate. Sometimes, God's people inherited land that had already been taken by others.
This verse clarifies why Israel could take Heshbon and the surrounding land. It wasn't originally Moab's land to begin with, at least not at that moment. Sihon, king of the Amorites, had already conquered the Moabites and taken their territory, extending all the way to the Arnon River. This means when Israel confronted Sihon, they weren't dispossessing Moab; they were taking land from the Amorites who had unjustly seized it.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Numbers 21:26 is available in the Sola app.
Heshbon wasn't just any town; it was a major stronghold. Its story, retold through ancient poems, reveals a lot about the Amorites and their impact on the region.
Heshbon is identified as Sihon's 'city,' implying it was his capital or a primary royal residence. The fact that Sihon had conquered Moab and extended his reach to the Arnon River shows his significant military power and territorial ambition.
Understand the original words
'Emoriy · Hebrew Noun
A member of a group of Semitic people dwelling in the mountainous regions east of the Jordan River; often identified as enemies of Israel who occupied land promised to God's people.
This verse highlights that the land Israel is claiming was not originally theirs to take from Moab, but had been justly conquered by the Amorites in prior warfare. This provides a theological justification for Israel's possession of the territory.
c. 13th century BC
Amorites conquer Moabite territory
Sihon, an Amorite king, wages war against the king of Moab and seizes control of Moabite lands, including the important city of Heshbon, extending his dominion to the Arnon River.
c. 13th century BC— this verse
Israel requests passage through Amorite land
As the Israelites journey towards the Promised Land, they send messengers to King Sihon, requesting peaceful passage through his territory. Sihon refuses and mobilizes his army.
c. 13th century BC
Israel defeats Sihon and takes Amorite cities
Sihon meets Israel in battle but is decisively defeated. Israel then conquers all Amorite cities and settles in their land, including Heshbon.
This passage directly lists Sihon, king of the Amorites, and his territory that Israel conquered, including Heshbon, reinforcing the historical account in Numbers.
Judges 11:22Jephthah recounts this very history to the Ammonites, showing how Sihon had taken land from Moab, which is the same context and justification provided in Numbers.
Deuteronomy 2:26-30This passage details Israel's request to pass through Sihon's land and Sihon's aggressive refusal, setting the stage for the conquest described in Numbers 21.
Psalm 135:10-12This psalm celebrates God's mighty acts in giving land to His people, specifically mentioning smiting Sihon and Og and giving their land as an heritage, mirroring the outcome of the conquest in Numbers.
gillNumbers 21:26: "For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even unto Arnon."
For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites,.... His royal city, where he kept his palace, where he had resided for some time, and perhaps some of his predecessors; and therefore being now in his possession when taken by the Israelites, they had a good right and title to keep it, and dwell in it: and…
calvinNumbers 21:21-32: "And Israel sent messengers unto Sihon king of the Amorites, saying,"
Let me pass through thy land: we will not turn into the fields, or into the vineyards; we will not drink of the waters of the well; but we will go along by the king's high-way, until we be past thy borders.
Transeam per terram tuam: non declinabimus per agros, neque per vineam: non bibemus aquas puteorum, via regia pergemus, donec transierimus terminum tuum.
And Sihon would not suffer Israel to…
This verse isn't just stating a historical fact; it's framing the Israelites' conquest as a reclamation. By highlighting that Sihon, the Amorite king, had taken Heshbon and the surrounding land from a former Moabite king, Moses shows that this territory wasn't rightfully Sihon's to begin with. It's like saying, "This land was stolen once, and now it's being justly reclaimed."
Just before this verse, Israel had requested peaceful passage through Sihon's land and was brutally denied, leading to a war where Israel conquered him and took his territory. This verse explains why Israel was justified in taking this land: Heshbon and the surrounding area weren't originally Sihon's, but had been forcefully seized by him from the Moabites years before. This historical context clarifies that Israel wasn't taking land from its rightful owners, but rather reclaiming territory that Sihon himself had unjustly acquired.
Just before this verse, Israel had requested peaceful passage through Sihon's land and was brutally denied, leading to a war where Israel conquered him and took his territory. This verse explains why Israel was justified in taking this land: Heshbon and the surrounding area weren't originally Sihon's, but had been forcefully seized by him from the Moabites years before. This historical context clarifies that Israel wasn't taking land from its rightful owners, but rather reclaiming territory that Sihon himself had unjustly acquired.
"For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab and taken all his land out of his hand, as far as the Arnon." — This verse isn't just stating a historical fact; it's framing the Israelites' conquest as a reclamation. By highlighting that Sihon, the Amorite king, had taken Heshbon and the surrounding land fro…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
