Therefore you shall give parting gifts to Moresheth-gath; the houses of Achzib shall be a deceitful thing to the kings of Israel.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Micah uses a clever wordplay to highlight the ultimate futility of seeking help from cities like Achzib, whose very name suggests deception. This isn't just about geographical location, but about the inherent unreliability of any refuge that isn't God. The "houses" here symbolize not just buildings, but the entire system of supposed security and alliances that will ultimately prove hollow.
Therefore you shall give parting gifts to Moresheth-gath; the houses of Achzib shall be a deceitful thing to the kings of Israel.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Micah is pronoucing judgment on Judah, specifically addressing the town of Lachish as a place that participated in the sins of Israel. He warns that this town and other cities in the region, like Moresheth-gath and Achzib, will not provide refuge or succor but will ultimately fail and deceive the kings who rely on them. This verse is part of a broader prophetic indictment against Judah's unfaithfulness and the impending consequences of their idolatry and misplaced trust.
Micah speaks of 'parting gifts' not for a wedding, but for a funeral. What does this unsettling imagery reveal about Judah's spiritual state?
The prophet uses the metaphor of marriage and divorce to describe Judah's relationship with God and the land He gave them.
The verse mentions 'Achzib,' a name that means 'deceitful.' What does it mean for a place, or even an ally, to become 'a lie'?
Micah powerfully uses the name Achzib to illustrate the futility of trusting in anything other than God.
Ask a follow-up
Understand the original words
akzab · Hebrew Noun/Adjective
That which is false, misleading, or disappointing; an object or action that proves to be a lie or a broken promise, often contrasted with the reliability of God.
Micah's prophecy in this verse speaks to the impending doom of Judah, even as the northern kingdom of Israel has already fallen. The prophet uses wordplay on place names like Moresheth-Gath and Achzib, both located in or near Philistine territory, to highlight the futility of seeking alliances with these nations for military aid against the Assyrians, as they will ultimately prove deceptive and unreliable.
c. 734 BC
Syro-Ephraimite War Begins
The kings of Aram (Syria) and Israel (the northern kingdom) attempt to force Judah's King Ahaz into an anti-Assyrian alliance. When Ahaz refuses, they invade Judah.
c. 732 BC
Assyrian Conquest of Aram and Israel
Tiglath-Pileser III of Assyria invades the region, conquering Aram and annexing significant parts of northern Israel. This event fulfills part of Micah's prophecy against Israel and intensifies the geopolitical pressure on Judah.
c. 722 BC
Fall of Samaria
The capital of the northern kingdom of Israel, Samaria, falls to the Assyrian Empire under Shalmaneser V. The northern kingdom ceases to exist as an independent entity.
c. 701 BC— this verse
Assyrian Invasion of Judah
King Sennacherib of Assyria invades Judah, conquering many fortified cities. Jerusalem is besieged but ultimately spared, largely due to a hefty tribute and possibly divine intervention.
This passage directly echoes the imagery of Achzib as a 'lie' by using a similar Hebrew wordplay to describe unreliable 'waters that fail,' highlighting the theme of deceptive hopes.
Isaiah 30:7It speaks of Egypt's help as 'futile and valueless,' mirroring Micah's message that trusting in foreign cities or alliances like Achzib will lead to disappointment and deceit for Israel's kings.
Genesis 38:5This verse mentions Judah at Chezib (likely the same place as Achzib), a context where expectations were also disappointed, providing a potential deeper layer to the name's ominous significance of deception.
1 Kings 9:16This verse uses the concept of 'presents' in relation to a 'dismissal' or dowry given by Pharaoh to Solomon, offering context for Micah's use of 'presents' to signify giving up or losing possession of Moresheth-gath.
barnesMicah 1:14: "Therefore shalt thou give presents to Moreshethgath: the houses of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel."
Therefore shalt thou give - (bridal) presents to Moresheth Gath Therefore! since Judah had so become a partaker of Israel's sins, she had broken the covenant, whereby God had given her the land of the pagan, and she should part with it to aliens. The bridal presents, literally the dismissals, were the dowry 1 Kings 9:16 with which the father sent away Judges 12:9 his da…
cambridgeMicah 1:14: "Therefore shalt thou give presents to Moreshethgath: the houses of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel."
14 . Therefore ] There is no logical sequence implied: ‘therefore’ often introduces a threatening passage—sin leading to punishment. The prophet abruptly turns to the people of Judah. shalt thou give presents , &c.] More strictly, farewell-presents . The meaning of the whole clause is that Judah will have to give up Moresheth-gath. True, it was to an enemy that this tow…
Micah uses a clever wordplay to highlight the ultimate futility of seeking help from cities like Achzib, whose very name suggests deception. This isn't just about geographical location, but about the inherent unreliability of any refuge that isn't God. The "houses" here symbolize not just buildings, but the entire system of supposed security and alliances that will ultimately prove hollow.
Micah is pronoucing judgment on Judah, specifically addressing the town of Lachish as a place that participated in the sins of Israel. He warns that this town and other cities in the region, like Moresheth-gath and Achzib, will not provide refuge or succor but will ultimately fail and deceive the kings who rely on them. This verse is part of a broader prophetic indictment against Judah's unfaithfulness and the impending consequences of their idolatry and misplaced trust.
Micah is pronoucing judgment on Judah, specifically addressing the town of Lachish as a place that participated in the sins of Israel. He warns that this town and other cities in the region, like Moresheth-gath and Achzib, will not provide refuge or succor but will ultimately fail and deceive the kings who rely on them. This verse is part of a broader prophetic indictment against Judah's unfaithfulness and the impending consequences of their idolatry and misplaced trust.
"Therefore you shall give parting gifts to Moresheth-gath; the houses of Achzib shall be a deceitful thing to the kings of Israel." — Micah uses a clever wordplay to highlight the ultimate futility of seeking help from cities like Achzib, whose very name suggests deception. This isn't just about geographical location, but about the…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026