Matthew 27:25
And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”
English Standard Version (ESV)
All verses
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Matthew 27:25
And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This seemingly straightforward declaration is actually a defiant inversion of an ancient law: Deuteronomy 21:8 speaks of asking God not to lay innocent blood to Israel's charge, but here, the crowd demands that Jesus' blood be on them, essentially cursing themselves and their descendants with the guilt and consequences of this unjust act. It reveals a terrifying willingness to embrace divine judgment rather than acknowledge Jesus' innocence.
As Pilate washes his hands to publicly disclaim responsibility for Jesus' death, the crowd, inflamed by the priests, defiantly shouts that Jesus' blood should be on them and their children. This desperate, self-cursing cry is the culmination of the people's rejection of Jesus as their King, choosing Barabbas instead, and it sets the stage for the immense suffering that would soon follow for the Jewish nation.
Have you ever said something in the heat of the moment you instantly regretted? The crowd before Pilate uttered a phrase that would echo for generations.
The cry, “His blood be on us and on our children!” wasn’t just an expression of anger; it was a profound, self-inflicted curse.
The Choice
Pilate, trying to appease the crowd and perhaps sensing Jesus' innocence, offered them a choice: Barabbas, a notorious criminal, or Jesus. The people, swayed by the religious leaders, chose Barabbas, a murderer, and rejected the Prince of Peace. This was a deliberate choice to set a known lawbreaker free while condemning the sinless Son of God.
The Imprecation
In their passionate hatred and rejection of Jesus, they invoked a curse upon themselves and their descendants. This wasn't a casual remark; it was an invocation, a desperate, public renunciation of responsibility that instead embraced the consequences. They essentially said, 'If we are wrong about Jesus, let the penalty for shedding innocent blood fall upon us and our families forever.' This ancient imprecation is one of the most chilling moments in Scripture.
Pilate publicly washed his hands, declaring himself innocent. But can such a ritual truly cleanse guilt?
Pilate's act of washing his hands before the crowd is a powerful, symbolic gesture that reveals a desperate attempt to shed responsibility. However, the Scriptures show that such outward acts are meaningless without an inner change of heart.
Symbolic Cleansing
In Jewish culture, washing hands could signify a declaration of innocence. Pilate performed this ritual in front of everyone, hoping to absolve himself of guilt for condemning Jesus. He wanted to make it clear to the crowd that they were the ones demanding Jesus' death, not him.
The Unseen Stain
Yet, as the commentators note, a few drops of water could not wash away the stain of condemning an innocent man, especially when he was pressured into it by the crowd. His conscience was troubled, and his wife had even sent him a warning message about Jesus. Despite knowing Jesus was innocent, he yielded to the pressure. His action was a performance for the crowd, not a genuine cleansing before God. The real guilt remained, a testament to the inadequacy of human efforts to escape divine justice.
The desperate cry of the crowd accepting responsibility for Jesus' blood finds a chilling fulfillment in the subsequent destruction of Jerusalem and the immense suffering of the Jewish people, a historical catastrophe that echoed their imprecation for centuries.
c. 30 AD— this verse
Jesus' Trial and Crucifixion
Jesus is tried by the Jewish Sanhedrin and Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea. Despite Pilate's attempts to release him, the crowd demands Jesus' crucifixion.
c. 30 AD
Crowd's Imprecation
The crowd, under immense pressure and religious fervor, cries out, 'His blood be on us and on our children!' effectively accepting responsibility for Jesus' death.
c. 66-70 AD
First Jewish-Roman War Begins
Revolt against Roman rule erupts in Judea, leading to widespread conflict and devastation.
70 AD
Destruction of Jerusalem and Temple
The Roman army under Titus captures Jerusalem, razes the Second Temple, and massacres or enslaves a significant portion of the Jewish population.
David says, "For your own mouth has testified against you, for you said, ‘I have sworn by the Lord, “Surely as the Lord lives, whoever would have delivered me up had I not killed you this day.”’" This echoes the idea of people's own words bringing judgment upon themselves.
Deuteronomy 21:8This passage describes a ritual for an unsolved murder where the elders say, "Avenge us not for the blood of this man, O Lord, and let not thy people Israel, whom thou hast redeemed, bear the guilt of innocent blood." The people's cry in Matthew inverts this plea, essentially accepting guilt for innocent blood.
Luke 23:28Jesus tells the weeping women of Jerusalem, “Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves and for your children.” This directly contrasts their sorrow for Him with the greater sorrow that will come upon them and their descendants due to their rejection of Him.
Acts 5:28Peter boldly states to the Sanhedrin, "We must obey God rather than men." This highlights the contrast between those who capitulated to the crowd's demands and those, like Peter, who stood for truth, even in the face of popular opposition.
Galatians 3:10Paul writes, "For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse." This passage speaks to the concept of being under a curse for failing to uphold God's law, paralleling the people's self-imposed curse for rejecting God's Son.
henryMatthew 27:11-25: "And Jesus stood before the governor: and the governor asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest."
27:11-25 Having no malice against Jesus, Pilate urged him to clear himself, and laboured to get him discharged. The message from his wife was a warning. God has many ways of giving checks to sinners, in their sinful pursuits, and it is a great mercy to have such checks from Providence, from faithful friends, and from our own conscience…
clarkeMatthew 27:25: "Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
His blood be on us and on our children - If this man be innocent, and we put him to death as a guilty person, may the punishment due to such a crime be visited upon us, and upon our children after us! What a dreadful imprecation! and how literally fulfilled! The notes on chap. 24, will show how they fell victims to their own imprecation, being visited with a series of calamities unexampled in the h…
This seemingly straightforward declaration is actually a defiant inversion of an ancient law: Deuteronomy 21:8 speaks of asking God not to lay innocent blood to Israel's charge, but here, the crowd demands that Jesus' blood be on them, essentially cursing themselves and their descendants with the guilt and consequences of this unjust act. It reveals a terrifying willingness to embrace divine judgment rather than acknowledge Jesus' innocence.
As Pilate washes his hands to publicly disclaim responsibility for Jesus' death, the crowd, inflamed by the priests, defiantly shouts that Jesus' blood should be on them and their children. This desperate, self-cursing cry is the culmination of the people's rejection of Jesus as their King, choosing Barabbas instead, and it sets the stage for the immense suffering that would soon follow for the Jewish nation.
As Pilate washes his hands to publicly disclaim responsibility for Jesus' death, the crowd, inflamed by the priests, defiantly shouts that Jesus' blood should be on them and their children. This desperate, self-cursing cry is the culmination of the people's rejection of Jesus as their King, choosing Barabbas instead, and it sets the stage for the immense suffering that would soon follow for the Jewish nation.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Matthew 27:25 is available in the Sola app.
The cry of the crowd was more than a moment of rejection; it became a prophecy of judgment that unfolded throughout history.
The imprecation, 'His blood be on us and on our children!' was not just a desperate outburst; it carried the weight of divine consequence. The history that followed for the Jewish people tragically fulfilled this cry.
Acknowledging the Curse
Commentators point to the devastating history of the Jewish people, particularly the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, as a stark fulfillment of this curse. The sheer number of crucifixions around the city and the ongoing calamities faced by the nation were seen as a direct consequence of their rejection of Jesus.
Unconscious Prophecy
While the people spoke in a moment of fanatical rage, their words acted as an unconscious prophecy. They sealed their own fate and that of their descendants, not because God needed their words to condemn them, but because their rejection of God's Son invited judgment. The verse from Ezekiel reminds us that while God holds individuals accountable, a pattern of rejecting Christ can lead to generational consequences when that rejection is perpetuated. The events that followed demonstrated that the blood they called down upon themselves was indeed a heavy, enduring burden.
"And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”" — This seemingly straightforward declaration is actually a defiant inversion of an ancient law: Deuteronomy 21:8 speaks of asking God not to lay innocent blood to Israel's charge, but here, the crowd…