Matthew 26:60-61
but they found none, though many false witnesses came forward. At last two came forward and said, “This man said, ‘I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to rebuild it in three days.’”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The verse highlights the frantic desperation of Jesus' accusers. Despite actively seeking any incriminating testimony and even presenting many false witnesses, they found nothing credible enough to condemn him, exposing the utter lack of genuine guilt. It took a specific, twisted version of his words about the temple, finally brought by just two witnesses, to provide the charge they were searching for.
Jesus has been arrested and brought before the chief priests and elders, who are desperately seeking any evidence to condemn him to death. Despite many people testifying against him, their stories don't match, and no credible charges emerge, showing how the authorities were grasping at straws to justify their predetermined verdict. Finally, two false witnesses step forward with a distorted accusation about Jesus' temple destruction prophecy, which will become the basis of their unlawful trial.
Imagine a courtroom where one person's word isn't enough. In Jesus' trial, the Jewish law had a specific requirement for conviction, and the accusers struggled to meet it.
The Jewish legal system, as outlined in Deuteronomy, required at least two or three witnesses to establish a charge, especially for capital offenses.
Why Two Witnesses?
In Jesus' trial, many false witnesses came forward, but their testimonies were inconsistent. They couldn't agree on the details, meaning their collective witness didn't meet the legal standard. This shows that even in their scheme to condemn Jesus, they were technically failing to meet their own legal requirements.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Matthew 26:60-61 is available in the Sola app.
Even when people conspire with false accusations, there's a divine hand at work. See how God's providence ensured Jesus' innocence was, in a way, exposed.
Despite the intense effort to find any plausible charge, the false witnesses couldn't produce a consistent testimony. This wasn't just bad luck for the accusers; it was God subtly protecting Jesus and highlighting the injustice.
Divine Providence at Play
God, in His wisdom, allowed this chaotic attempt at a trial to unfold. The inability to find valid witnesses, and the subsequent distortion of Jesus' words, ultimately served to reveal the unrighteousness of the accusers and the innocence of Jesus.
Understand the original words
naos · Greek Noun
In the Old Testament, this refers to the physical structure in Jerusalem where God's presence dwelt; in the New Testament, it is used metaphorically for the body of Christ or the community of believers where God resides by His Spirit.
c. AD 30— this verse
Jesus' Arrest and Trial Begins
Following his arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus is immediately taken to the high priest Caiaphas, where the Sanhedrin (the Jewish high court) convenes.
c. AD 30
Sanhedrin Seeks False Testimony
The Sanhedrin actively seeks false witnesses to testify against Jesus, aiming to find grounds for a capital offense, but their initial efforts fail due to inconsistent accounts.
c. AD 30
Two Witnesses Testify
Two false witnesses finally come forward, claiming Jesus said he could destroy and rebuild the temple in three days. This statement is a perversion of Jesus' words about his own resurrection.
c. AD 30
Condemnation by the Sanhedrin
Based on the distorted testimony, the Sanhedrin declares Jesus guilty of a capital crime, although they lack the authority to execute him and will present their case to the Roman governor.
This passage establishes the legal requirement for two or three witnesses to establish a charge, highlighting the sham of the proceedings against Jesus where such consensus was impossible to achieve with false testimony.
Psalm 35:11This psalm directly laments the experience of facing false witnesses and accusations, echoing the prophetic suffering that Jesus endured during his trial.
Isaiah 53:7This verse describes the suffering servant who is led like a lamb to the slaughter and opens not his mouth, mirroring Jesus' silence and unjust treatment before his accusers.
Acts 6:11-13This passage shows a similar pattern of inciting the people and suborning false witnesses against Stephen, demonstrating that the tactics used against Jesus were repeated against early Christians.
1 Peter 2:21-23This passage connects Jesus' suffering, including His silence when reviled and threatened with false accusations, directly to the example believers should follow.
barnesMatthew 26:60: "But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses,"
Found none - That is, they found none on whose testimony they could with any show of reason convict him. The reason was, as Mark says Mark 14:56 , that "their witnesses agreed not together." They differed about facts, times, and circumstances, as all false witnesses do. Two witnesses were required by their law, and they did not "dare" to condemn him without conformi…
henryMatthew 26:57-68: "And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled."
26:57-68 Jesus was hurried into Jerusalem. It looks ill, and bodes worse, when those who are willing to be Christ's disciples, are not willing to be known to be so. Here began Peter's denying him: for to follow Christ afar off, is to begin to go back from him. It is more our concern to prepare for the end, whatever it may be, than curiously to ask w…
The verse highlights the frantic desperation of Jesus' accusers. Despite actively seeking any incriminating testimony and even presenting many false witnesses, they found nothing credible enough to condemn him, exposing the utter lack of genuine guilt. It took a specific, twisted version of his words about the temple, finally brought by just two witnesses, to provide the charge they were searching for.
Jesus has been arrested and brought before the chief priests and elders, who are desperately seeking any evidence to condemn him to death. Despite many people testifying against him, their stories don't match, and no credible charges emerge, showing how the authorities were grasping at straws to justify their predetermined verdict. Finally, two false witnesses step forward with a distorted accusation about Jesus' temple destruction prophecy, which will become the basis of their unlawful trial.
Jesus has been arrested and brought before the chief priests and elders, who are desperately seeking any evidence to condemn him to death. Despite many people testifying against him, their stories don't match, and no credible charges emerge, showing how the authorities were grasping at straws to justify their predetermined verdict. Finally, two false witnesses step forward with a distorted accusation about Jesus' temple destruction prophecy, which will become the basis of their unlawful trial.
"but they found none, though many false witnesses came forward. At last two came forward and said, “This man said, ‘I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to rebuild it in three days.’”" — The verse highlights the frantic desperation of Jesus' accusers. Despite actively seeking any incriminating testimony and even presenting many false witnesses, they found nothing credible enough…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
