Matthew 23:18-19
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Jesus highlights a twisted logic: the scribes and Pharisees claimed oaths by the altar were insignificant, but oaths by the gift on the altar were binding. This reveals their focus on tangible wealth and offerings, overlooking that the altar itself was consecrated by God and thus holier than the items placed upon it. They were more concerned with personal gain and the appearance of piety than with the true source of sacredness.
And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.’ You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred?
English Standard Version (ESV)
Jesus is calling out the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, exposing how they twist religious rules to serve their own gain. He’s just condemned their practice of creating loopholes for oaths sworn by less significant things like heaven or God's throne. Now, he confronts their even more absurd distinction between swearing by the altar and swearing by the sacrifice placed upon it.
The religious leaders of Jesus' day created a twisted logic about oaths. They said swearing by the altar meant nothing, but swearing by the gift on the altar made you accountable. Why this bizarre distinction?
Jesus exposes the hypocrisy of the religious leaders by highlighting their flawed reasoning.
The Altar's Sacredness
The altar was a powerful symbol. It represented God's presence and the place where sacrifices were made to atone for sin. It was consecrated by God himself, making it holy.
The Gift's Hierarchy
The 'gift' was the animal or offering placed on the altar. The religious leaders argued that since people brought the gift, and it was their offering, swearing by it held more personal weight or obligation. This effectively elevated their own offerings and their perceived righteousness above God's designated place of worship.
Jesus' Correction
Jesus points out the absurdity: 'Which is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifies the gift?' (Matthew 23:19). The altar's holiness, given by God, was what made the gift acceptable. By focusing on the gift over the altar, they were valuing the human element and the tangible offering more than God's presence and His system of atonement.
Why would religious leaders create rules that made oaths less binding? It sounds like a loophole for dishonesty. What was really going on beneath the surface?
Ask a follow-up
The scribes and Pharisees were masters of outward show, but their hearts were far from God. Their rules about oaths reveal a deep-seated hypocrisy.
Evasion Over Truth
By declaring oaths by the altar 'nothing' but oaths by the gift as binding, they created a way to avoid accountability. If you wanted to lie, you could swear by the altar, knowing your peers (and likely the leaders themselves) wouldn't consider it a serious offense. This allowed for deceit while maintaining a facade of piety.
Covetousness and Control
As commentators note, this was often driven by greed and a desire for control. They valued what was tangible and connected to their own actions or prestige (like the 'gold of the temple' or the 'gifts' they might receive) over the sacred institutions God had established. This twist in logic served their worldly interests, allowing them to gain advantages and avoid consequences.
Undermining God's Authority
Ultimately, this 'logic' undermined God's authority. Oaths are meant to invoke God as a witness and judge. By creating a hierarchy of oath-worthiness based on human priorities, they were diminishing the sanctity of God's name and His presence, which the altar symbolized.
Understand the original words
thysiastērion · Greek Noun
A place of sacrifice designed for the offering of gifts and the atonement of sins, serving as the mediator between the worshiper and God.
dōron · Greek Noun
An offering or sacrifice brought to God, representing the devotee's submission and acknowledgment of God's provision.
omnyō · Greek Verb
To take a solemn vow or invoke God's name to guarantee the truth of a statement or the fulfillment of a promise; it subjects the speaker to divine judgment if the oath is broken.
opheilō · Greek Verb/Participle
To be under a formal obligation or covenantal commitment; it signifies a state of being held responsible for one's vows, particularly before God.
horkos · Greek Noun
The act of swearing a solemn promise, acting as an appeal to God as the ultimate witness and judge of one's sincerity.
Jesus calls out the Pharisees for their twisted logic that valued a sacred 'gift' on the altar more than the altar itself, and thus God's presence. This illustrates how their focus on external rituals and material possessions overshadowed true reverence for God.
c. 950 BC
Solomon's Temple Dedicated
The First Temple in Jerusalem, the central place of Israel's worship, is dedicated. It houses the Ark of the Covenant and is considered God's dwelling place on earth.
c. 722 BC
Fall of Samaria and Northern Kingdom
The Assyrian Empire conquers the Northern Kingdom of Israel, deporting many citizens. This event heightens anxieties in Judah about divine judgment and the security of their religious practices.
586 BC
Destruction of Jerusalem and First Temple
The Babylonian Empire under Nebuchadnezzar II destroys Jerusalem and the First Temple, exiling a significant portion of the Judean population. This catastrophe profoundly impacts Jewish identity and theology.
c. 538 BC
Return from Babylonian Exile
Following Cyrus the Great's decree, some Jewish exiles return to Jerusalem and begin rebuilding the Temple. This marks a period of restoration and a renewed focus on adherence to the Law.
c. 20 BC - AD 30
Herod the Great Rebuilds the Temple
Herod the Great undertakes a massive project to renovate and expand the Second Temple in Jerusalem. This magnificent structure becomes a focal point of Jewish religious life and national pride.
c. AD 28-30— this verse
Jesus' Ministry and Teachings
Jesus begins his public ministry, challenging the religious establishment and teaching about the Kingdom of God. His critiques of the Pharisees' hypocrisy, including their interpretations of oaths, are delivered during this period.
This verse directly addresses the misuse of God's name in oaths, highlighting that swearing falsely by the Lord's name is a serious sin. It parallels Jesus' concern with the Pharisees' trivialization of oaths by focusing on the sanctity of God's name itself.
Deuteronomy 6:13This passage commands that people shall fear the Lord their God, serve Him, and swear by His name alone. It provides the foundational principle that any oath is ultimately an invocation of God, underscoring why Jesus finds the Pharisees' distinctions so abhorrent.
Malachi 1:7The prophets condemned offering polluted food or unworthy sacrifices on the altar, deeming them unacceptable to God. This connects to Jesus' critique, as the Pharisees were valuing the 'gift' (sacrifice) placed on the altar more than the altar itself, which represented God's holiness.
Matthew 23:16-17These preceding verses directly condemn the 'blind guides' for prioritizing lesser things (like gold) over the greater (the Temple). This serves as the immediate context and explanation for why swearing by the altar is seen as less binding than swearing by the gift upon it, a logic Jesus dismantles.
Proverbs 12:22This proverb states that lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, while those who deal faithfully are His delight. It reinforces the spiritual principle that honesty and integrity in speech, especially in oaths, are foundational to a relationship with God, directly contrasting with the Pharisees' deceptive practices.
calvinMatthew 23:16-22: "Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!"
- Woe to you, blind guides! who say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but he who shall swear by the gold of the temple is guilty. 17. Fools, and blind! for which is greater, the gold, or the temple which sanctifieth the gold? 18. And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whoso…
henryMatthew 23:13-33: "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."
23:13-33 The scribes and Pharisees were enemies to the gospel of Christ, and therefore to the salvation of the souls of men. It is bad to keep away from Christ ourselves, but worse also to keep others from him. Yet it is no new thing for the show and form of godliness to be made a cloak to t…
Jesus highlights a twisted logic: the scribes and Pharisees claimed oaths by the altar were insignificant, but oaths by the gift on the altar were binding. This reveals their focus on tangible wealth and offerings, overlooking that the altar itself was consecrated by God and thus holier than the items placed upon it. They were more concerned with personal gain and the appearance of piety than with the true source of sacredness.
Jesus is calling out the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, exposing how they twist religious rules to serve their own gain. He’s just condemned their practice of creating loopholes for oaths sworn by less significant things like heaven or God's throne. Now, he confronts their even more absurd distinction between swearing by the altar and swearing by the sacrifice placed upon it.
Jesus is calling out the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, exposing how they twist religious rules to serve their own gain. He’s just condemned their practice of creating loopholes for oaths sworn by less significant things like heaven or God's throne. Now, he confronts their even more absurd distinction between swearing by the altar and swearing by the sacrifice placed upon it.
"And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.’ You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred?" — Jesus highlights a twisted logic: the scribes and Pharisees claimed oaths by the altar were insignificant, but oaths by the gift on the altar were binding. This reveals their focus on tangible weal…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
