Matthew 19:10-11
The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Matthew 19:10-11
The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The disciples aren't just complaining about marriage; they're reacting to the cause of divorce. They understand Jesus has narrowed the grounds for separation significantly, making the commitment feel incredibly restrictive and potentially miserable if a partner isn't ideal. This shows their mindset was still tied to the prevailing, lax Jewish customs that allowed divorce for almost any reason, rather than grasping the profound, grace-filled commitment Jesus was now defining.
Jesus has just taught the Pharisees that divorce is permissible only in cases of sexual immorality, directly challenging the common Jewish practice of divorce for any reason. The disciples, hearing this strict teaching, express their astonishment and concern, believing that such an absolute commitment makes marriage an unbearable burden and suggesting it would be better to remain single.
The disciples' response sounds extreme: 'It's better not to marry!' What specific 'case' or condition are they reacting to that makes marriage seem so unbearable?
When Jesus spoke about divorce, he wasn't just stating a rule; he was revealing the cause and condition of marriage. The Greek word used here, 'aitia' (αἰτία), doesn't just mean 'situation,' but points to the underlying reason or cause.
Jesus had just pointed back to the creation account, emphasizing God's original design for marriage: two becoming one flesh, an inseparable union. The prevailing Jewish teaching, however, allowed for divorce for almost any reason. The disciples, accustomed to this 'easy out,' were shocked.
They understood Jesus' teaching to mean that if a husband couldn't divorce his wife even for significant issues (perhaps they interpreted 'no divorce' strictly), then marriage was an unbearable 'case' – a binding obligation with no escape hatch. Their focus was on the potential hardship for the man if he couldn't divorce his wife.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Matthew 19:10-11 is available in the Sola app.
The disciples thought Jesus' teaching made marriage too difficult. But Jesus saw it differently. What was his ultimate goal for those who embraced his challenging words?
The disciples saw Jesus' teaching on marital permanence as a heavy burden, a 'knot' of obligation they'd rather avoid by not marrying at all. Their perspective was human-centered, focused on personal convenience and avoiding discomfort.
Jesus, however, redirects their focus. In the verses immediately following, he speaks about those who 'cannot receive this saying' (Matthew 19:11) and introduces the concept of eunuchs – not just literal ones, but those who 'have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven' (Matthew 19:12).
This isn't a promotion of mandatory celibacy. Instead, Jesus is highlighting that some are uniquely gifted by God to remain unmarried, freeing them from the specific cares of marriage to pursue spiritual devotion with undivided attention. For those not given this gift, the challenge isn't to invent celibacy, but to embrace the God-ordained 'case' of marriage with a willingness to bear its potential difficulties for a higher purpose – the kingdom of heaven.
The disciples' reaction reveals the profound cultural and legal norms surrounding divorce in first-century Judaism, which Jesus' teaching directly challenged and radically redefined.
c. 1900-1700 BC
Early Development of Divorce Practices
While the Torah allows divorce, early patriarchal societies likely developed more informal practices and customs surrounding marital dissolution, laying groundwork for later debates.
c. 500 BC
Deuteronomic Law Codified
The book of Deuteronomy, which includes regulations on divorce (Deut. 24:1-4), was likely finalized around this period, influencing Jewish legal thought for centuries.
c. 200 BC - AD 50
Rabbinic Schools Develop Differing Views on Divorce
During the Second Temple period, influential rabbinic schools, such as Hillel and Shammai, debated the grounds for divorce, with Hillel allowing it for almost any cause and Shammai for a more limited set of reasons.
c. AD 28-30— this verse
Jesus' Teaching on Divorce and Marriage
Jesus directly addresses the Pharisees' questions about divorce, emphasizing the divine intention for lifelong marital union and challenging the prevailing lax interpretation of the law.
c. AD 30-60
Disciples' Reaction to Jesus' Stricter View
Jesus' disciples, accustomed to the looser Jewish customs and legal interpretations of divorce, express shock and confusion at his uncompromising teaching, finding it an extremely difficult standard to accept.
c. AD 60-65
Paul's Letters Address Marital Issues
The Apostle Paul, in his letters like 1 Corinthians, offers further guidance on marriage, divorce, and singleness within the Christian community, reflecting on Jesus' teachings and the practical realities faced by believers.
This passage describes the original institution of marriage as good, directly contrasting the disciples' reaction that it's 'not good' under the stricter interpretation of fidelity Jesus is presenting.
1 Corinthians 7:1Paul echoes the disciples' sentiment, though framed as a question, acknowledging the complexities and potential difficulties within marriage that make celibacy seem preferable to some.
1 Corinthians 7:8-9Here, Paul offers a similar alternative to difficult marriages, suggesting that while marriage is good, remaining single can also be a valid choice for those who can receive it, aligning with the disciples' sentiment for a different reason.
Matthew 19:11-12Jesus immediately follows the disciples' statement by explaining that not everyone can 'receive' the idea of strict marital fidelity, referencing those who are eunuchs, including those who choose celibacy for the kingdom of heaven, thereby re-contextualizing the disciples' hasty conclusion.
vincentMatthew 19:10: "His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry."
The case (αἰτία)Not the relation of the man to his wife, nor the circumstances, the state of the case. Αἰτία refers to cause (Matthew 19:3), and the meaning is, if the matter stands thus with reference to the cause which the man must have for putting away his wife.
calvinMatthew 19:10-12: "His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry."
- His disciples say to him, If such be the case of the man with his wife, [600] it is not expedient to enter into marriage. 11. Who said to them, [601] All are not capable of receiving this saying, but those to whom it is given. 12. For there are eunuchs, who were so born from their mother's womb; and there are eunuchs, who have been made eunuchs by men; and there are eunuchs,…
The disciples aren't just complaining about marriage; they're reacting to the cause of divorce. They understand Jesus has narrowed the grounds for separation significantly, making the commitment feel incredibly restrictive and potentially miserable if a partner isn't ideal. This shows their mindset was still tied to the prevailing, lax Jewish customs that allowed divorce for almost any reason, rather than grasping the profound, grace-filled commitment Jesus was now defining.
Jesus has just taught the Pharisees that divorce is permissible only in cases of sexual immorality, directly challenging the common Jewish practice of divorce for any reason. The disciples, hearing this strict teaching, express their astonishment and concern, believing that such an absolute commitment makes marriage an unbearable burden and suggesting it would be better to remain single.
Jesus has just taught the Pharisees that divorce is permissible only in cases of sexual immorality, directly challenging the common Jewish practice of divorce for any reason. The disciples, hearing this strict teaching, express their astonishment and concern, believing that such an absolute commitment makes marriage an unbearable burden and suggesting it would be better to remain single.
"The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given." — The disciples aren't just complaining about marriage; they're reacting to the cause of divorce. They understand Jesus has narrowed the grounds for separation significantly, making the commitment fe…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.