Matthew 1:15-16
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
While this verse lists names in a seemingly straightforward succession, its true significance lies in its quiet correction of a common misconception. By carefully tracing the lineage through Jacob, Matthew underscores that Jesus' right to the throne of David wasn't based on a direct, unbroken biological line from Solomon, but rather on a legal claim that allowed for complexities like adoption and inheritance, especially after the royal line faltered. This highlights God's intricate and faithful plan, weaving together human circumstances with His divine purpose to bring about the promised Messiah.
and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This passage is part of Matthew's genealogy of Jesus, tracing his lineage back through King David and Abraham. It follows a series of names, detailing generations that led to Joseph, the earthly father of Jesus. The names here bridge the gap from King David's descendants after the Babylonian exile to Joseph, highlighting a crucial, though less documented, part of Jesus's royal lineage.
Why does Matthew include names we don't recognize from other parts of Scripture? It turns out these 'lost' names are crucial pieces of God's meticulously preserved plan.
Matthew 1:15 lists Eliud, Eleazar, Matthan, and Jacob—names that don't appear elsewhere in the canonical Bible. This isn't an oversight; it's a testament to God's careful preservation of lineage, even when human records fade.
Preserving the Promise
The Jewish people meticulously kept genealogies, especially those tracing back to King David, because the Messiah was promised to come from his line. Even though these specific records are lost to us today, Matthew had access to them, guided by the Holy Spirit. He was copying from official family trees that ensured the unbroken line of Davidic descent could be traced.
The Bigger Picture
While some names might seem obscure, they collectively fulfill a divine purpose: to prove Jesus' legitimate claim to the throne of David. This lineage wasn't just about history; it was about validating the promises of God and establishing Jesus as the promised King.
Matthew and Luke both give genealogies of Jesus, but they look very different! How can we trust them, and what does this tell us about Jesus' identity?
The differing genealogies in Matthew and Luke often cause confusion. The key to understanding them lies in recognizing their distinct purposes and the way they trace Jesus' lineage through different lines (Matthew often through the royal line of Solomon, Luke through a more natural, potentially maternal line).
Ask a follow-up
Legal vs. Natural Descent
Matthew's genealogy likely focuses on the legal right to the throne of David. This is why it traces through Joseph, Jesus' legal father, emphasizing the kingly succession. Luke's genealogy, on the other hand, may trace the natural descent, possibly through Mary, highlighting Jesus' humanity and His connection to all people as the Son of Adam.
Complementary Truths
These aren't contradictions, but complementary truths. Matthew establishes Jesus' right to rule as King, fulfilling promises made to David. Luke shows Jesus as the Savior for all humanity, connecting Him back to the first man, Adam.
Divine Authority
Both genealogies, despite their differences, are divinely inspired and meant to confirm Jesus' identity. They work together to reveal that Jesus is both the promised King from David's line and the Savior of the world.
Understand the original words
Christos · Greek Noun
A title derived from the Hebrew 'Mashiach', meaning 'Anointed One'. It refers to the promised King and Savior of Israel who would fulfill God's covenantal promises to establish an eternal kingdom.
c. 605 BC
First Babylonian Deportation
King Jehoiakim of Judah, along with a portion of the Jerusalem elite, including Daniel, were taken captive to Babylon. This marked the beginning of the Babylonian exile.
586 BC
Destruction of Jerusalem and Second Temple
Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, destroyed Jerusalem and the First Temple, exiling most of the remaining population. This event significantly altered Jewish society and leadership.
c. 539 BC
Persian Conquest of Babylon
Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon, leading to the Edict of Cyrus which allowed exiled Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their Temple.
c. 516 BC
Completion of the Second Temple
The Second Temple in Jerusalem was completed and dedicated, signifying a return to religious life for the Jewish people after the Babylonian exile.
c. 458 BC
Ezra's Return to Jerusalem
The scribe Ezra returned to Jerusalem with a large group of exiles, focusing on religious reforms and the restoration of the Law.
c. 445 BC
Nehemiah Rebuilds Jerusalem's Walls
Nehemiah, cupbearer to the Persian king, was appointed governor and led the rebuilding of Jerusalem's walls, strengthening the city's defenses and civic life.
c. 100 BC - 1 BC
Hasmonean Dynasty and Roman Influence
The Hasmonean dynasty ruled Judea, maintaining a degree of independence but facing increasing Roman influence and internal strife.
This passage presents a parallel genealogy of Jesus, offering a different perspective and highlighting the complexities and potential discrepancies in tracing lineage, which was crucial for Messianic claims.
1 Chronicles 3:19-24This chapter lists descendants of David through Zerubbabel, providing context for some of the names found in Matthew's genealogy and showing how these royal lines were preserved after the exile.
Ruth 4:18-22This passage traces the lineage from Perez to David, establishing the foundational royal line that Matthew's genealogy ultimately seeks to prove through Jesus.
2 Samuel 7:12-16This is the Davidic covenant, a foundational promise that the Messiah would come from David's line, making the genealogy in Matthew deeply significant for validating Jesus' Messianic identity.
pulpitMatthew 1:15: "And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;"
Verse 15. - Eleazar begat Matthan. St. Luke makes Matthat (or Hatthan; the names are from the same root, and in some texts are identical), to be the son of Levi. This is probably the actual fact. St. Luke seems to have traced the genealogy from Zerubbabel through a younger, son, St. Matthew through an elder. But the elder line failing, Matthan, the son of Levi, of the younger branch, becomes heir to, an…
pooleMatthew 1:15: "And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;"
Ver. 13-15. Here are divers objections made to this last part of the genealogy, and in a great measure caused from the difference between Matthew and Luke; but I shall not attempt any reconciliation of those differences till I come to Luke 3:23-38 . There is no Abiud reckoned amongst the sons of Zorobabel, 1 Chronicles 3:19,20 ; and for the others named, we have no certain account of them in any part of…
While this verse lists names in a seemingly straightforward succession, its true significance lies in its quiet correction of a common misconception. By carefully tracing the lineage through Jacob, Matthew underscores that Jesus' right to the throne of David wasn't based on a direct, unbroken biological line from Solomon, but rather on a legal claim that allowed for complexities like adoption and inheritance, especially after the royal line faltered. This highlights God's intricate and faithful plan, weaving together human circumstances with His divine purpose to bring about the promised Messiah.
This passage is part of Matthew's genealogy of Jesus, tracing his lineage back through King David and Abraham. It follows a series of names, detailing generations that led to Joseph, the earthly father of Jesus. The names here bridge the gap from King David's descendants after the Babylonian exile to Joseph, highlighting a crucial, though less documented, part of Jesus's royal lineage.
This passage is part of Matthew's genealogy of Jesus, tracing his lineage back through King David and Abraham. It follows a series of names, detailing generations that led to Joseph, the earthly father of Jesus. The names here bridge the gap from King David's descendants after the Babylonian exile to Joseph, highlighting a crucial, though less documented, part of Jesus's royal lineage.
"and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ." — While this verse lists names in a seemingly straightforward succession, its true significance lies in its quiet correction of a common misconception. By carefully tracing the lineage through Jacob, M…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
