For many bore false witness against him, but their testimony did not agree.
English Standard Version (ESV)
What's striking here is that even though many people were brought forward to testify against Jesus, their stories didn't align. The law required at least two witnesses to agree for any accusation to stand, and in this case, the prosecution couldn't even get their false witnesses to present a consistent narrative. It highlights how flimsy and poorly constructed the case against Jesus was, even before he remained silent.
For many bore false witness against him, but their testimony did not agree.
English Standard Version (ESV)
The religious leaders, desperate to condemn Jesus, gathered many witnesses against Him. However, their testimonies were full of contradictions and falsehoods, failing to meet the legal requirement for even a single charge. This chaotic scene highlights their flawed attempts to find a crime worthy of death for Jesus, especially as some later witnesses distorted His words about destroying and rebuilding the temple.
Imagine a courtroom where the prosecution's witnesses couldn't even agree with each other. How could a judge possibly make a decision?
In ancient Israelite law, the testimony of a single witness was not enough, especially in capital cases. Deuteronomy 17:6 states, 'On the evidence of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the evidence of only one witness.' Even more critically, Deuteronomy 19:15 emphasizes that their testimonies must agree. This wasn't just a formality; it was a safeguard against false accusations and a pillar of justice. The fact that 'many bore false witness against him, but their testimony did not agree' highlights a critical flaw in the 'trial' of Jesus. The very foundation of legitimate legal proceedings was absent.
Why would the religious leaders desperately seek out witnesses, and why would their stories fall apart?
The leaders were determined to condemn Jesus, but they lacked any solid evidence. This forced them to 'seek' for witnesses, and as many commentaries point out, these witnesses were not reliable. They were either lying outright or twisting Jesus' words. Mark specifically notes that their testimonies 'did not agree.' This suggests a chaotic and poorly executed plan, driven by malice rather than justice. It shows the lengths to which people will go when they refuse to accept the truth and are determined to eliminate someone they perceive as a threat. Their inability to produce consistent accusations reveals the hollowness of their case against Jesus.
Understand the original words
Ask a follow-up
pseudomartyreō · Greek Verb
To give false testimony or slander; in a legal context, it refers to perjury, which violates the commandment against bearing false witness. In the case of Christ, it represents the hostility of the world against the truth.
martyria · Greek Noun
A public attestation or evidence provided to establish a fact. In a judicial setting, it serves as the basis for a verdict; here, the lack of agreement highlights the invalidity of the accusations against Jesus.
The failure of multiple false witnesses to agree highlights the desperation and unlawfulness of Jesus' trial. Jewish law required at least two witnesses, and their testimony had to align, underscoring the flawed basis for Jesus' condemnation.
c. AD 18
Caiaphas Appointed High Priest
Valerius Gratus, the Roman prefect of Judea, appoints Caiaphas as the high priest. Caiaphas would hold this influential position for many years, playing a key role in the events surrounding Jesus' trial.
c. AD 30-33
Jesus' Ministry and Crucifixion
During this period, Jesus travels throughout Galilee and Judea, teaching, healing, and gathering followers. His growing influence and claims lead to increasing opposition from religious authorities.
c. AD 30-33 (Night of Arrest)— this verse
Jesus Arrested
Following his arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus is first taken to Annas, the former high priest, before being brought to Caiaphas, the current high priest, where the religious leaders are gathered.
c. AD 30-33 (Night of Trial)
Attempted False Witness
The Sanhedrin, led by Caiaphas, seeks to find evidence to condemn Jesus to death. Many come forward with false accusations, but their testimonies are contradictory and do not align, failing to meet the legal requirement for conviction.
c. AD 30-33 (Morning of Trial)
Sanhedrin Convenes
After the failed attempt to secure convincing false witnesses during the night, the full Sanhedrin convenes in the morning to formally try Jesus. They accuse him of blasphemy and condemn him to death.
c. AD 30-33
Jesus Before Pilate
Following his condemnation by the Sanhedrin, Jesus is handed over to the Roman governor Pontius Pilate for execution, as the Jewish council lacked the authority to carry out a death sentence.
This passage from the Law sets the requirement that any charge must be confirmed by the testimony of two or three witnesses, directly highlighting why the differing accounts against Jesus were problematic.
Psalm 35:11This psalm expresses the exact sentiment of being falsely accused and having untrue charges brought against someone, mirroring the experience Jesus endured during His trial.
Acts 6:13This verse describes false witnesses being suborned against Stephen, showing a parallel pattern of fabricated testimony used to condemn faithful servants of God.
1 Timothy 5:19This verse reiterates the legal principle that an accusation should be upheld by two or three witnesses, underscoring the procedural failure in Jesus' trial.
Hebrews 10:28This passage reflects on the severity of rejecting God's law, implying that severe judgment was deserved by those who disregarded established legal principles, as the accusers of Jesus did.
pulpitMark 14:56: "For many bare false witness against him, but their witness agreed not together."
Verse 56. - For many bare false witness against him, and their witness agreed not together. Whatever things these witnesses brought forward were either false, or self-contradictory, or beside the purpose.
ellicottMark 14:56: "For many bare false witness against him, but their witness agreed not together."
(56) Their witness agreed not together. —St. Mark gives what St. Matthew only implies as the cause of the failure.
What's striking here is that even though many people were brought forward to testify against Jesus, their stories didn't align. The law required at least two witnesses to agree for any accusation to stand, and in this case, the prosecution couldn't even get their false witnesses to present a consistent narrative. It highlights how flimsy and poorly constructed the case against Jesus was, even before he remained silent.
The religious leaders, desperate to condemn Jesus, gathered many witnesses against Him. However, their testimonies were full of contradictions and falsehoods, failing to meet the legal requirement for even a single charge. This chaotic scene highlights their flawed attempts to find a crime worthy of death for Jesus, especially as some later witnesses distorted His words about destroying and rebuilding the temple.
The religious leaders, desperate to condemn Jesus, gathered many witnesses against Him. However, their testimonies were full of contradictions and falsehoods, failing to meet the legal requirement for even a single charge. This chaotic scene highlights their flawed attempts to find a crime worthy of death for Jesus, especially as some later witnesses distorted His words about destroying and rebuilding the temple.
"For many bore false witness against him, but their testimony did not agree." — What's striking here is that even though many people were brought forward to testify against Jesus, their stories didn't align. The law required at least two witnesses to agree for any accusation to…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026