Luke 3:19-20
But Herod the tetrarch, who had been reproved by him for Herodias, his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things that Herod had done, added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Luke 3:19-20
But Herod the tetrarch, who had been reproved by him for Herodias, his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things that Herod had done, added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
It's easy to see this as just John calling out Herod's bad marriage, but Luke subtly highlights that John didn't just address one sin. He "reproved him for Herodias... and for all the evil things that Herod had done," emphasizing John's unwavering commitment to speaking truth about the totality of Herod's wickedness. This wasn't a one-off correction, but a consistent confrontation with a ruler's entire life of wrongdoing.
This passage highlights John the Baptist's bold confrontation with Herod Antipas, the ruler of Galilee. Luke strategically places this account here to introduce John's eventual imprisonment, even though it occurred later in time. John, fearless in his calling, directly rebuked Herod not only for his illegal marriage to his brother's wife, Herodias, but also for his general wickedness.
John the Baptist didn't shy away from confronting powerful rulers. Why is it so difficult for us to speak truth to power, even today?
Speaking Truth to Power
John the Baptist stands as a towering example of prophetic courage. He wasn't just preaching to crowds; he confronted King Herod himself. This wasn't a matter of political opinion, but a direct challenge to Herod's deeply immoral actions.
Why would Luke mention John's imprisonment before Jesus' baptism? Discover the narrative artistry that makes the Gospels so powerful.
Narrative Foreshadowing
Luke, like other Gospel writers, isn't always strictly chronological. Here, he employs a literary technique called anticipation or foreshadowing.
Understand the original words
tetrarchēs · Greek Noun
A ruler of a fourth part of a region; a subordinate governor under the Roman Empire. It highlights the political authority that often stands in opposition to the kingdom of God.
elenchō · Greek Verb
To correct, expose, or convict someone of their wrongdoing. In a biblical context, it involves speaking truth to power or confronting sin with the intent of repentance.
This verse highlights the courage of John the Baptist in confronting a powerful ruler. Herod Antipas, though initially impressed by John, ultimately imprisoned him due to political pressure and his own illicit relationship, demonstrating how earthly power often silences divine truth.
c. 4 BC
Death of Herod the Great
Herod the Great, father of Herod Antipas, dies. His kingdom is divided among his sons, with Antipas receiving the tetrarchy of Galilee and Perea.
c. AD 20s
Herod Antipas divorces his first wife
Herod Antipas, ruler of Galilee and Perea, divorces his first wife, Phasaelis, daughter of the Nabatean king Aretas IV. This sets the stage for his unlawful marriage.
c. AD 27-30
John the Baptist begins his ministry
John the Baptist starts preaching a message of repentance and baptizing in the wilderness of Judea, drawing large crowds.
c. AD 28-31— this verse
John reproves Herod Antipas
John confronts Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, for his illegal marriage to Herodias, his brother Philip's former wife. This act of faithfulness leads to John's imprisonment.
This passage details the same illicit marriage that John confronted Herod about, highlighting the specific sin of taking his brother's wife as the primary offense.
Mark 6:17-19Mark's Gospel offers a more personal account of Herod's reaction to John's reproof, showing his internal struggle and how Herodias was the driving force behind his actions against John.
Leviticus 18:16This Old Testament law explicitly forbids marrying a brother's wife, providing the divine basis for John the Baptist's condemnation of Herod's actions.
Acts 24:25This passage shows a parallel where Paul's preaching on righteousness, self-control, and future judgment causes Felix to tremble, mirroring how John's message deeply affected Herod on similar moral issues.
Luke 13:31-32Jesus refers to Herod Antipas as a 'fox,' a term that speaks to his cunning and deceitful nature, further contextualizing why confronting such a ruler would be dangerous and require great courage from John.
barnesLuke 3:19: "But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip's wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done,"
See the notes at Matthew 14:1-13 . "Added this above all." To all his former crimes he added this; not implying that this was the "worst" of his acts, but that this was "one" of his deeds, of like character as the others. The event here mentioned did not take place until some time after this, but it is mentioned here to show what was the end of John's pr…
cambridgeLuke 3:19: "But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip's wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done,"
19 . But Herod the tetrarch ] The incident which follows is here introduced by anticipation, that the subsequent narrative may not be disturbed. It should be compared with the fuller notice in Mark 6:17-20 ; Matthew 14:3-5 . From these passages we learn that John had reproved Antipas for many crimes, and that Antipas was so convinced of his holiness and…
It's easy to see this as just John calling out Herod's bad marriage, but Luke subtly highlights that John didn't just address one sin. He "reproved him for Herodias... and for all the evil things that Herod had done," emphasizing John's unwavering commitment to speaking truth about the totality of Herod's wickedness. This wasn't a one-off correction, but a consistent confrontation with a ruler's entire life of wrongdoing.
This passage highlights John the Baptist's bold confrontation with Herod Antipas, the ruler of Galilee. Luke strategically places this account here to introduce John's eventual imprisonment, even though it occurred later in time. John, fearless in his calling, directly rebuked Herod not only for his illegal marriage to his brother's wife, Herodias, but also for his general wickedness.
This passage highlights John the Baptist's bold confrontation with Herod Antipas, the ruler of Galilee. Luke strategically places this account here to introduce John's eventual imprisonment, even though it occurred later in time. John, fearless in his calling, directly rebuked Herod not only for his illegal marriage to his brother's wife, Herodias, but also for his general wickedness.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Luke 3:19-20 is available in the Sola app.
c. AD 30-32
Imprisonment of John the Baptist
Herod Antipas imprisons John the Baptist in the fortress of Machaerus to appease Herodias and silence John's public rebukes, though he was initially troubled by John's message.
c. AD 36
Battle between Aretas IV and Herod Antipas
The Nabatean king Aretas IV, father of Herod Antipas' first wife, wages war against Herod Antipas, possibly in retaliation for the divorce and subsequent marriage. Aretas gains victory, and Antipas appeals to Rome.
"But Herod the tetrarch, who had been reproved by him for Herodias, his brother’s wife, and for all the evil things that Herod had done, added this to them all, that he locked up John in prison." — It's easy to see this as just John calling out Herod's bad marriage, but Luke subtly highlights that John didn't just address one sin. He "reproved him for Herodias... and for all the evil things…