Judges 17:6
In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's easily missed here is that the absence of a king wasn't just a political void; it meant a complete collapse of moral accountability. When people have no external standard or authority to answer to, "what was right in their own eyes" quickly devolved into following their own desires and whims, leading directly to the idolatry and chaos described in the passage.
This verse kicks off the final, chaotic section of Judges, describing a period of spiritual and moral freefall after Joshua's death and the passing of the elders. Without a central leader or judge to guide them, the Israelites had descended into widespread idolatry and self-serving behavior, doing whatever felt right to them personally rather than following God's law. This breakdown of order directly leads into the story of Micah, who creates his own personal shrine and priesthood, illustrating the anarchy that pervades the land.
Ever feel like society is losing its way? This verse points to a terrifying absence of leadership and the chaos it breeds.
The phrase 'no king in Israel' here doesn't just mean there wasn't a literal monarch. It signifies a profound lack of a central, God-ordained authority – no supreme judge or leader to uphold divine law. When this governing structure is absent, people are left to their own devices. The consequence? Each person becomes their own king, making their own desires and whims the ultimate law.
This leads to a society where morality is subjective and personal preference replaces divine command. What's 'right' is determined by one's own heart, not by God's Word. This isn't freedom; it's the fertile ground for sin and error to flourish, as seen in Micah's misguided idol worship.
We value our freedom to choose, but what happens when that freedom means ignoring God's clear commands?
The core issue in Judges 17:6 is the dangerous conflation of personal opinion with divine truth. 'Everyone did what was right in his own eyes' means that individual perception and desire became the ultimate arbiter of right and wrong. This is a slippery slope.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Judges 17:6 is available in the Sola app.
When there's no external, divine standard being upheld – no 'king' representing God's authority – then personal preference, impulse, or even selfish lusts dictate actions. This isn't just about societal breakdown; it's a spiritual problem. It's choosing self-rule over submission to the Creator. The text makes it clear that what suited 'his own fancy or lusts' was ultimately evil in God's sight, regardless of how right it seemed to the individual.
Understand the original words
melek · Hebrew Noun
A title referring to a monarch with supreme authority over a nation, or metaphorically to God as the sovereign ruler over His people and the universe. In the context of Israel, it refers to the lack of central covenantal leadership under God's designated authority.
yashar b'einayw · Hebrew Phrase
A state of moral autonomy or anarchy where individuals determine truth and morality based on personal preference rather than objective divine revelation or covenantal law.
This verse captures the chaotic spiritual and social state of Israel during the period of the Judges, a time characterized by a lack of centralized leadership and a widespread disregard for God's law, leading to rampant idolatry and self-serving behavior.
c. 1375–1350 BC
Period after Joshua's Death
Following the death of Joshua and the elders of his generation, the unified leadership that had conquered Canaan dissolved.
c. 1350–1070 BC
Cycle of Apostasy and Oppression
Israel repeatedly turned away from God, leading to cycles of oppression by foreign nations and subsequent deliverance by God-raised judges.
Unknown, during the period of the Judges— this verse
Micah Establishes Idolatrous Shrine
Micah steals from his mother, then uses the money to create a shrine with carved and molten images, employing a wandering Levite as his priest.
Unknown, during the period of the Judges
Danites Seek New Territory
The tribe of Dan, lacking sufficient territory, sends scouts who pass by Micah's shrine and encourage the tribe to take the idols and the Levite priest.
Unknown, during the period of the Judges
Danites Settle Laish
The Danites conquer the city of Laish, rename it Dan, and establish Micah's idolatrous shrine there, which persists for generations.
c. 1070 BC
End of the Period of Judges
The period concludes with the rise of Samuel, the last judge, leading to the establishment of the monarchy.
This Psalm echoes the desperate plea of Judges 17:6, highlighting a time when faithfulness seemed to vanish and deceitful people were honored, mirroring the societal breakdown described in the days without a king.
Proverbs 12:15This verse directly contrasts with the mindset of Judges 17:6, stating that 'the way of a fool is right in his own eyes,' underscoring the danger of self-guided morality that the passage describes.
Romans 1:28Paul describes a similar spiritual condition where, because people rejected God, He 'gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done,' showing that abandoning divine guidance leads to self-serving and immoral actions.
1 Samuel 15:23This verse shows King Saul's rebellion against God's command, illustrating the 'stubbornness' and 'idolatry' that arises when one's own will or perceived 'rightness' supersedes God's authority, a direct parallel to the 'doing what was right in his own eyes' mentality.
bensonJudges 17:6: "In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes."
Jdg 17:6 . There was no king in Israel — No judge to govern and control them; the word king being used largely for a supreme magistrate. God raised up judges to rule and deliver the people when he saw fit; and at other times for their sins he suffered them to be without them, and such a time this was; and therefore they ran into that idolatry from which the judges usually kept them;…
clarkeJudges 17:6: "In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes."
There was no king in Israel - The word מלך melech, which generally means king, is sometimes taken for a supreme governor, judge, magistrate, or ruler of any kind; (see Genesis 36:31 , and Deuteronomy 33:5 ); and it is likely it should be so understood here. Every man did that which was right in his own eyes - He was his own governor, and what he did he said was right; and, by his c…
What's easily missed here is that the absence of a king wasn't just a political void; it meant a complete collapse of moral accountability. When people have no external standard or authority to answer to, "what was right in their own eyes" quickly devolved into following their own desires and whims, leading directly to the idolatry and chaos described in the passage.
This verse kicks off the final, chaotic section of Judges, describing a period of spiritual and moral freefall after Joshua's death and the passing of the elders. Without a central leader or judge to guide them, the Israelites had descended into widespread idolatry and self-serving behavior, doing whatever felt right to them personally rather than following God's law. This breakdown of order directly leads into the story of Micah, who creates his own personal shrine and priesthood, illustrating the anarchy that pervades the land.
This verse kicks off the final, chaotic section of Judges, describing a period of spiritual and moral freefall after Joshua's death and the passing of the elders. Without a central leader or judge to guide them, the Israelites had descended into widespread idolatry and self-serving behavior, doing whatever felt right to them personally rather than following God's law. This breakdown of order directly leads into the story of Micah, who creates his own personal shrine and priesthood, illustrating the anarchy that pervades the land.
"In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes." — What's easily missed here is that the absence of a king wasn't just a political void; it meant a complete collapse of moral accountability. When people have no external standard or authority to answe…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
