Judges 1:27-28
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The verse highlights that the Canaanites "persisted in dwelling in that land," not just out of a desire to stay, but actively chose to remain, even submitting to tribute. This reveals a critical moment where Israel's half-hearted obedience allowed these pagan people to dig in, setting the stage for future conflict and spiritual compromise.
Manasseh did not drive out the inhabitants of Beth-shean and its villages, or Taanach and its villages, or the inhabitants of Dor and its villages, or the inhabitants of Ibleam and its villages, or the inhabitants of Megiddo and its villages, for the Canaanites persisted in dwelling in that land. When Israel grew strong, they put the Canaanites to forced labor, but did not drive them out completely.
English Standard Version (ESV)
The chapter is recounting the progress of the Israelite conquest of Canaan after Joshua's death, moving northwards through various tribes. This specific verse highlights the failure of the half-tribe of Manasseh to fully dispossess the Canaanites from key strategic cities in the fertile Jezreel Valley and along the coast. This inability to complete the conquest, a recurring theme, sets the stage for the future compromises and difficulties Israel will face.
God gave the Israelites a clear mission: to drive out the Canaanites. But what happens when they only partially succeed, or even fail?
Judges 1:27 highlights a critical failure of the tribe of Manasseh. They didn't fully conquer the land assigned to them, allowing the Canaanites to persist in key cities like Beth-shean and Megiddo.
A Pattern of Compromise
This wasn't just a military oversight; it was a spiritual compromise. God's command was absolute: no cohabitation or tolerance of the Canaanites and their idolatrous practices. Allowing them to remain was a direct disobedience.
Seeds of Future Trouble
This incomplete conquest set the stage for future generations. The 'Canaanites who persisted' became a snare to the Israelites, leading them into idolatry and ultimately bringing God's judgment upon them. It's a stark reminder that even partial obedience carries significant risk.
Why would the Israelites, after experiencing God's deliverance, settle for living alongside the very people God commanded them to remove?
The text implies that the Canaanites 'persisted in dwelling in that land.' This wasn't necessarily a passive thing. They were determined to stay, and the Israelites, for reasons not explicitly stated but easily inferred, allowed it.
The Lure of Ease
Ask a follow-up
Commentators suggest reasons like laziness, cowardice, or even greed. Perhaps it was easier to make a treaty or demand tribute than to engage in further difficult warfare. These fertile plains and established cities offered a level of comfort and immediate gain.
The Trade-Off
But this comfort came at a terrible cost. By not fully consecrating the land to God and removing the idolatrous influences, the Israelites opened themselves up to spiritual corruption. The allure of the familiar and the comfortable often overshadows the call to wholehearted devotion.
Understand the original words
Menashsheh · Hebrew Proper Noun
The tribe descended from Joseph's elder son; it was one of the largest tribes and held territory on both sides of the Jordan River. Their failure to purge their assigned territory of pagan influence is a recurring theme in the book of Judges.
Kena'aniy · Hebrew Proper Noun
The indigenous people of the land of Canaan, descendants of Noah’s grandson Canaan. In the Bible, they represent the idolatrous, pagan cultures that Israel was commanded by God to drive out to maintain holiness and prevent spiritual apostasy.
yashab · Hebrew Verb
A reference to physical inhabitants who have settled or remained in a location. In a theological sense, the refusal of these peoples to leave or of Israel to drive them out symbolizes spiritual compromise and failure to fully obey God's mandate for the land.
mac · Hebrew Noun
Refers to the labor imposed on conquered or subject peoples, often involving heavy, involuntary work. In Israel's history, it represented a failure to fully occupy the land according to God’s covenantal instruction, resulting in a compromised coexistence.
This verse highlights a critical turning point where incomplete obedience by the Israelites—the half-tribe of Manasseh—allowed Canaanite strongholds to persist, setting the stage for future conflicts and the cycle of disobedience described throughout the book of Judges.
c. 1480 BC
Thutmose III's Conquests
Egyptian Pharaoh Thutmose III lists cities like Taanach and Megiddo among his conquests in Canaan, indicating their importance and control by established powers before Israel's arrival.
c. 1350 BC
Amarna Letters Mention Megiddo
Clay tablets from the Amarna period, found near Taanach, mention Megiddo, highlighting its strategic significance and ongoing interactions between Canaanite city-states and external powers.
c. 1200 BC
Israelite Conquest of Canaan
Following the Exodus, Joshua leads the Israelites in a military campaign to conquer Canaan, aiming to dispossess the existing inhabitants as commanded by God.
Post-Joshua Era— this verse
Manasseh Fails to Expel Canaanites
The tribe of Manasseh, specifically the half tribe settled west of the Jordan, does not drive out the Canaanites from key cities like Beth-shean, Taanach, Dor, Ibleam, and Megiddo.
During the Period of the Judges
Canaanites Persist in the Land
The Canaanites stubbornly remain in their cities, sometimes through their own resistance and sometimes due to the Israelites' unwillingness to fully expel them, leading to ongoing friction and potential assimilation.
c. 1000 BC
Battle of Mount Gilboa
Centuries later, Beth-shean is the site where the Philistines display the bodies of King Saul and his sons, illustrating the continued strategic importance and contested nature of the region.
This passage directly parallels Judges 1:27, highlighting that Manasseh, despite being assigned these areas, did not drive out the Canaanites, allowing them to persist in those cities.
Judges 1:21This verse shows a similar failure by the tribe of Benjamin to drive out the Jebusites from Jerusalem, demonstrating a pattern of incomplete conquest and cohabitation with existing peoples across different tribes.
Judges 1:35This verse records that the Amorites forced the people of Dan back, illustrating how the failure to fully dispossess Canaanites, as seen with Manasseh, led to the Israelites being confined and even pushed back by them.
Exodus 23:31-33This passage from the Law warns Israel not to let the Canaanites remain in their land, as they would become a snare and lead Israel into idolatry, directly addressing the consequences of the disobedience seen in Judges 1:27.
Psalm 106:34-36This psalm reflects on Israel's history, lamenting their failure to destroy the nations as commanded and how they ended up serving the nations' idols, echoing the failure of Manasseh and other tribes in Judges and its dire spiritual results.
wesleyJudges 1:27: "Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean and her towns, nor Taanach and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Ibleam and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns: but the Canaanites would dwell in that land."
1:27 Manasseh - That is, that half of this tribe which dwelt in Canaan.
jfbJudges 1:27: "Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean and her towns, nor Taanach and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Ibleam and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns: but the Canaanites would dwell in that land."
27-36. The same course of subjugation was carried on in the other tribes to a partial extent, and with varying success. Many of the natives, no doubt, during the progress of this exterminating war, saved…
The verse highlights that the Canaanites "persisted in dwelling in that land," not just out of a desire to stay, but actively chose to remain, even submitting to tribute. This reveals a critical moment where Israel's half-hearted obedience allowed these pagan people to dig in, setting the stage for future conflict and spiritual compromise.
The chapter is recounting the progress of the Israelite conquest of Canaan after Joshua's death, moving northwards through various tribes. This specific verse highlights the failure of the half-tribe of Manasseh to fully dispossess the Canaanites from key strategic cities in the fertile Jezreel Valley and along the coast. This inability to complete the conquest, a recurring theme, sets the stage for the future compromises and difficulties Israel will face.
The chapter is recounting the progress of the Israelite conquest of Canaan after Joshua's death, moving northwards through various tribes. This specific verse highlights the failure of the half-tribe of Manasseh to fully dispossess the Canaanites from key strategic cities in the fertile Jezreel Valley and along the coast. This inability to complete the conquest, a recurring theme, sets the stage for the future compromises and difficulties Israel will face.
"Manasseh did not drive out the inhabitants of Beth-shean and its villages, or Taanach and its villages, or the inhabitants of Dor and its villages, or the inhabitants of Ibleam and its villages, or the inhabitants of Megiddo and its villag…" — The verse highlights that the Canaanites "persisted in dwelling in that land," not just out of a desire to stay, but actively chose to remain, even submitting to tribute. This reveals a critical mome…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
