Joshua 11:13
But none of the cities that stood on mounds did Israel burn, except Hazor alone; that Joshua burned.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
While it's easy to see this as just a list of cities burned or spared, the text highlights a strategic decision: Israel intentionally preserved cities built on defensible mounds. This shows they weren't just destroying, but also claiming and preparing the land for their own future, leaving well-positioned strongholds intact for their use.
After a massive victory where God delivered a huge coalition of northern Canaanite kings into Israel's hands, Joshua systematically destroyed their armies and captured their cities. This verse clarifies that while many cities were taken and their inhabitants destroyed, Joshua only burned down Hazor, the head of these kingdoms, choosing instead to leave many other fortified cities standing.
Joshua's campaign involved both total destruction and strategic preservation. Why was Hazor singled out for fire, while other strong cities were left intact?
Joshua 11:10-11 tells us Hazor was 'the head of all those kingdoms' and the origin of the conflict. Its complete destruction was a strategic necessity to dismantle the enemy's power base and prevent future rebellion. It wasn't just another city; it was the command center.
In contrast, the other cities 'that stood still in their strength' were left unburned. The Hebrew word here can mean cities situated on hills or mounds, implying natural defenses, or it can refer to cities that retained their walls and fortifications intact after being conquered. These cities were preserved for Israel to inhabit. This wasn't leniency; it was practical strategy. Israel needed places to live and govern, and these strongholds were ready-made.
Was Joshua's approach to burning cities a personal strategy, or was it divinely ordained? This verse hints at a deeper divine direction behind seemingly military tactics.
The text emphasizes that Joshua acted according to God's command. While the destruction of Hazor and the preservation of other cities might appear as Joshua's own military genius, the broader context of Joshua's conquest shows a pattern of obedience to God's instructions.
Calvin notes that God's commands, like houghing horses and burning chariots (Joshua 11:6, 9), were intended to keep Israel dependent on Him, not on military might. Similarly, the specific command regarding Hazor (as hinted by tradition mentioned by Gill) served a theological purpose: to utterly remove the root of rebellion. The preservation of other cities was also part of God's plan for Israel's settlement and establishment in the land.
This verse highlights a specific, strategic decision amidst a large-scale conquest: while most cities were left intact (perhaps for Israelite settlement or due to treaties), Hazor, the capital of a major hostile alliance, was utterly destroyed by fire as a singular act of judgment.
Late 13th Century BC
Conquest of Canaan Under Joshua
Following the Exodus and wilderness wanderings, Joshua leads the Israelites in a sweeping military campaign to conquer the land of Canaan, fulfilling God's promises to their ancestors.
Late 13th Century BC
Northern Coalition Mobilizes
Numerous Canaanite kings in the north, led by the King of Hazor, form a powerful confederation to resist the Israelite invasion, amassing a large army with horses and chariots.
Late 13th Century BC
Battle of the Waters of Merom
Joshua's forces surprise and decisively defeat the allied Canaanite armies near the Waters of Merom, scattering their forces and capturing their horses and chariots as commanded.
Late 13th Century BC— this verse
Joshua Captures and Burns Hazor
Following the great victory, Joshua turns to confront Hazor, the strategic center of the northern coalition, captures it, and burns it to the ground as a testament to God's judgment.
This verse also speaks of cities being rebuilt and re-established, drawing a parallel to the idea of cities 'standing in their strength' and being preserved rather than destroyed.
Judges 4:2This passage directly references Hazor again, showing that it was indeed re-occupied and became a center of oppression, which explains why its complete destruction in Joshua was significant.
Deuteronomy 17:16This law, given to Israel's future kings, warned against accumulating horses and chariots, much like Joshua destroyed them after battle, highlighting a consistent theme of reliance on God rather than military might.
Matthew 5:14Jesus' metaphor of a city set on a hill, which cannot be hidden, resonates with the description of cities 'standing on their mounds' or hills, suggesting a visible and enduring presence.
calvinJoshua 11:1-15: "And it came to pass, when Jabin king of Hazor had heard those things, that he sent to Jobab king of Madon, and to the king of Shimron, and to the king of Achshaph,"
And the LORD said unto Joshua, Be not afraid because of them: for to morrow about this time will I deliver them up all slain before Israel: thou shall hough their horses, and burn their chariots with fire.
Dixit autem Jehova ad Josuam, Ne timeas a facie eorum: cras enim hoc tempore tradam omnes istos occisos…
gillJoshua 11:13: "But as for the cities that stood still in their strength, Israel burned none of them, save Hazor only; that did Joshua burn."
But as for the cities that stood still in their strength,.... Whose walls were not demolished when taken, as Kimchi and Jarchi interpret it, or that "stood upon their heaps" (y); upon an eminence, being built on hills and mountains: Israel burned none of them; but reserved them for their own habitations, being well fortified, and having no need of new wall…
While it's easy to see this as just a list of cities burned or spared, the text highlights a strategic decision: Israel intentionally preserved cities built on defensible mounds. This shows they weren't just destroying, but also claiming and preparing the land for their own future, leaving well-positioned strongholds intact for their use.
After a massive victory where God delivered a huge coalition of northern Canaanite kings into Israel's hands, Joshua systematically destroyed their armies and captured their cities. This verse clarifies that while many cities were taken and their inhabitants destroyed, Joshua only burned down Hazor, the head of these kingdoms, choosing instead to leave many other fortified cities standing.
After a massive victory where God delivered a huge coalition of northern Canaanite kings into Israel's hands, Joshua systematically destroyed their armies and captured their cities. This verse clarifies that while many cities were taken and their inhabitants destroyed, Joshua only burned down Hazor, the head of these kingdoms, choosing instead to leave many other fortified cities standing.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Joshua 11:13 is available in the Sola app.
Late 13th Century BC
Consolidation of Israelite Control
After the major battles, Joshua and the Israelites proceed to subdue the remaining Canaanite strongholds, systematically conquering and claiming the land.
c. 1200 BC - 1100 BC
Period of Israelite Settlement
The land is divided among the tribes of Israel, and the process of establishing Israelite governance and society begins, though pockets of Canaanite influence remain.
"But none of the cities that stood on mounds did Israel burn, except Hazor alone; that Joshua burned." — While it's easy to see this as just a list of cities burned or spared, the text highlights a strategic decision: Israel intentionally preserved cities built on defensible mounds. This shows they were…
