they said to him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law, Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?”
English Standard Version (ESV)
The accusers used the phrase "in the very act" to emphasize the undeniable nature of the woman's transgression, implying they had caught her in the most compromising and undeniable way. This precise phrasing, along with their immediate demand for Jesus to pass judgment according to Moses' law, reveals their strategic intent: to trap Jesus by forcing him into a corner where he either contradicted the law or appeared to condone sin.
they said to him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law, Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?”
English Standard Version (ESV)
Jesus was teaching in the temple when religious leaders, seeking to trap him, brought a woman caught in adultery and demanded to know if she should be stoned according to the Law of Moses. They hoped Jesus would either contradict the Law and undermine his authority or uphold it and alienate himself from those who sought mercy. Jesus, by first writing on the ground, paused their accusatory momentum before directly challenging their own sinfulness.
Imagine the scene: a woman dragged before Jesus, accused of adultery. But her sin was just the stage for a much bigger play.
The religious leaders didn't bring this woman to Jesus out of genuine concern for justice or God's law. Their intention was to "trap" Him.
The Setup
This wasn't a spontaneous act of righteousness; it was a carefully crafted trap.
While everyone expected Jesus to play their game, He turned the tables in a way no one saw coming.
Instead of directly answering their legalistic question, Jesus responded with profound insight, revealing the hypocrisy of His accusers and the nature of true judgment.
Beyond the Accusation
Ask a follow-up
Jesus didn't abolish the Law; He exposed the sinfulness of those who would weaponize it while ignoring their own flaws.
Understand the original words
didaskale · Greek Noun
A title identifying Jesus as a rabbi or authoritative instructor of divine truth. In the Gospels, it reflects his role as the revealer of God's will and the ultimate authority on the interpretation of Scripture.
torah · Hebrew Noun
A term referring to the Pentateuch or the entire body of divine instruction given through Moses. It serves as the standard for holiness, righteousness, and the covenant relationship between God and Israel.
Mosheh · Hebrew Noun
The first prophet of Israel through whom God gave the covenant and the law at Sinai. He is the mediator of the Old Covenant and the foundational figure of the Jewish religious system.
lithazein · Greek Verb
A technical term for the capital punishment prescribed in the Mosaic Law for specific violations of the covenant, particularly sexual immorality or blasphemy. It symbolized the purging of evil from the community.
This incident occurred during Jesus' public ministry, a time of intense scrutiny from religious leaders who sought to discredit him and test his understanding of the Law, against the backdrop of Roman rule which added complexity to judicial matters.
c. 27-30 AD— this verse
Jesus' Ministry in Jerusalem
Jesus is teaching and ministering in Jerusalem, drawing crowds and attracting the attention of the religious authorities.
c. 27-30 AD
Religious Tension in Judea
The period was marked by significant tension between Jewish religious leaders and Roman occupation forces, as well as internal religious disputes among Jewish sects.
c. 27-30 AD
Pharisaical and Scribe Opposition
The Scribes and Pharisees, as leading religious interpreters and enforcers of the Law, frequently challenged Jesus' teachings and authority, seeking to trap him.
c. 27-30 AD
Roman Rule and Capital Punishment
Under Roman rule, Jewish religious courts had limited authority, especially concerning capital punishment. This complicated the application of Mosaic Law for capital offenses.
This passage directly states the Mosaic Law's command to stone adulterers, which the scribes and Pharisees use to challenge Jesus, highlighting the legal and religious context of their accusation.
Deuteronomy 17:6-7This passage details the requirement for at least two or three witnesses to testify against an accused person and for the witnesses to cast the first stone, which Jesus references when he asks for a sinless accuser.
Romans 2:1-3Paul addresses the hypocrisy of those who judge others for sins they themselves commit, echoing Jesus' rebuke of the scribes and Pharisees who were also guilty of sin.
Matthew 5:27-28Jesus expands the definition of adultery to include lustful thoughts, demonstrating his higher standard of righteousness and contrasting it with the external, legalistic approach of the accusers.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10This passage lists various sins, including adultery, and states that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God, reinforcing the seriousness of the offense and the need for repentance.
calvinJohn 8:1-11: "Jesus went unto the mount of Olives."
- But Jesus went to the mountain of Olives. 2. And early in the morning he again came to the temple, and all the people came to him; and sitting down, he taught them 3. And the scribes and Pharisees bring to him a woman caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst, 4. They say to him, Master, this woman was caught in the very act, while she was committing adultery. 5. Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such persons; but what sayes…
gillJohn 8:4: "They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act."
They say unto him, Master,.... They applied to him in a handsome and respectful manner, the better to cover their ill design: this woman was taken in adultery; by two persons at least, who could be witnesses of it; otherwise the accusation was not legal; see Deuteronomy 19:15; though in the case of a wife suspected of adultery, they admitted a single witness as valid (f): in the very act; or "in the theft…
The accusers used the phrase "in the very act" to emphasize the undeniable nature of the woman's transgression, implying they had caught her in the most compromising and undeniable way. This precise phrasing, along with their immediate demand for Jesus to pass judgment according to Moses' law, reveals their strategic intent: to trap Jesus by forcing him into a corner where he either contradicted the law or appeared to condone sin.
Jesus was teaching in the temple when religious leaders, seeking to trap him, brought a woman caught in adultery and demanded to know if she should be stoned according to the Law of Moses. They hoped Jesus would either contradict the Law and undermine his authority or uphold it and alienate himself from those who sought mercy. Jesus, by first writing on the ground, paused their accusatory momentum before directly challenging their own sinfulness.
Jesus was teaching in the temple when religious leaders, seeking to trap him, brought a woman caught in adultery and demanded to know if she should be stoned according to the Law of Moses. They hoped Jesus would either contradict the Law and undermine his authority or uphold it and alienate himself from those who sought mercy. Jesus, by first writing on the ground, paused their accusatory momentum before directly challenging their own sinfulness.
"they said to him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law, Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?”" — The accusers used the phrase "in the very act" to emphasize the undeniable nature of the woman's transgression, implying they had caught her in the most compromising and undeniable way. This precise…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026