John 18:31
Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Pilate’s challenge to the Jews to "judge him by your own law" wasn't just a suggestion; it was a pointed attempt to shift responsibility, forcing them to acknowledge their desire for Jesus' death. The Jews' immediate refusal reveals a crucial detail: while they held religious authority, the power of capital punishment had effectively been removed from their hands by the Romans.
Pilate, seeking to avoid responsibility, tells the Jewish leaders to judge Jesus themselves according to their own law. The religious leaders refuse, stating they lack the authority to execute anyone, thereby shifting the ultimate decision back to Pilate. This exchange highlights the complex political and religious tensions as the leaders maneuver to have Jesus put to death, a fate foreshadowed by Jesus himself, who knew he would be crucified by the Romans, not stoned by the Jews.
Pilate tries to punt the problem back to the Jewish leaders. Why is he doing this, and what does his tactic reveal?
Pilate, finding no clear Roman crime, attempts to shift the responsibility back to the Jewish authorities. He says, 'Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.' This isn't just avoiding work; it's a shrewd political move.
The Jewish leaders refuse Pilate's offer. What's the real reason they can't 'judge him by their own law'?
The Jewish leaders' reply, 'It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death,' reveals a critical legal and political reality under Roman occupation.
Understand the original words
krinete · Greek Verb
In a judicial sense, to exercise authority to determine guilt or innocence and pass sentence according to a set of standards or statutes.
nomos · Greek Noun
A system of rules, divine or civil, regulating conduct. In this context, it refers to the Mosaic Law held by the Jewish leaders.
apokteinōmen · Greek Verb
The capital punishment or termination of physical life. In John, it often carries deeper significance regarding Jesus' redemptive sacrifice.
This exchange reveals the complex political landscape of Roman-occupied Judea. The Jewish leaders, while possessing religious authority, had lost the power of capital punishment to the Romans, forcing them to use Roman authority to execute Jesus for perceived political crimes.
c. AD 6
Judea becomes a Roman province
After the banishment of Herod Archelaus, Judea was organized as a Roman province, and Pontius Pilate was later appointed as governor. This shift significantly curtailed Jewish self-governance, particularly the power of capital punishment.
c. AD 30-33— this verse
Jesus' trial before the Sanhedrin
The Jewish high council, the Sanhedrin, tried Jesus. While they found him worthy of death by their laws (e.g., for blasphemy), they lacked the authority to carry out a death sentence under Roman rule.
c. AD 30-33
Jesus handed over to Pilate
The Jewish leaders brought Jesus to the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, seeking his execution. They accused Jesus of treason against Rome, a charge that fell under Roman jurisdiction and demanded Pilate's authority.
c. AD 30-33
Pilate attempts to shift responsibility
Pilate, possibly hesitant or seeking to avoid direct involvement, offered to let the Jews judge Jesus by their own law. This highlights the tense political situation and the limits of Jewish authority.
This passage shows Jesus standing before Pilate, who questions Him, but Jesus offers no defense, mirroring the dynamic where the Jewish leaders are trying to force Pilate's hand and Jesus remains silent.
Acts 7:54-60This account of Stephen's stoning highlights a situation where a Jewish crowd, fueled by religious leaders, takes matters into their own hands, suggesting a context where the direct power of capital punishment by the Jewish authorities was questionable or circumvented.
Deuteronomy 17:6This Old Testament law states that a person must be put to death only upon the testimony of two or three witnesses, setting the legal standard that the Jewish leaders were trying to bypass or manipulate by bringing Jesus to Pilate.
John 19:10-11Pilate asserts his authority over Jesus' life or death, directly referencing the power that the Jewish leaders lacked and were trying to leverage through him, reinforcing the political and legal complexities of the situation.
vincentJohn 18:31: "Then said Pilate unto them, Take ye him, and judge him according to your law. The Jews therefore said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death:"
Take ye him (λάβετε αὐτὸν ὑμεῖς)The A.V. obscures the emphatic force of ὑμεῖς, you. Pilate's words display great practical shrewdness in forcing the Jews to commit themselves to the admission that they desired Christ's death. "Take him yourselves (so Rev.), and judge him according to your law." "By our law," reply t…
henryJohn 18:28-32: "Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was early; and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover."
18:28-32 It was unjust to put one to death who had done so much good, therefore the Jews were willing to save themselves from reproach. Many fear the scandal of an ill thing, more than the sin of it. Christ had said he should be delivered to the Gentiles, and they should put him to…
Pilate’s challenge to the Jews to "judge him by your own law" wasn't just a suggestion; it was a pointed attempt to shift responsibility, forcing them to acknowledge their desire for Jesus' death. The Jews' immediate refusal reveals a crucial detail: while they held religious authority, the power of capital punishment had effectively been removed from their hands by the Romans.
Pilate, seeking to avoid responsibility, tells the Jewish leaders to judge Jesus themselves according to their own law. The religious leaders refuse, stating they lack the authority to execute anyone, thereby shifting the ultimate decision back to Pilate. This exchange highlights the complex political and religious tensions as the leaders maneuver to have Jesus put to death, a fate foreshadowed by Jesus himself, who knew he would be crucified by the Romans, not stoned by the Jews.
Pilate, seeking to avoid responsibility, tells the Jewish leaders to judge Jesus themselves according to their own law. The religious leaders refuse, stating they lack the authority to execute anyone, thereby shifting the ultimate decision back to Pilate. This exchange highlights the complex political and religious tensions as the leaders maneuver to have Jesus put to death, a fate foreshadowed by Jesus himself, who knew he would be crucified by the Romans, not stoned by the Jews.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about John 18:31 is available in the Sola app.
Beyond the legal technicalities, this exchange highlights a profound tension between human laws and God's ultimate plan.
This moment is a powerful illustration of how human systems, with their laws and political maneuvering, often collide with God's sovereign purposes.
c. AD 30-33
Jesus crucified
Ultimately, Pilate condemned Jesus to crucifixion, a Roman form of execution. This fulfilled Jesus' prophecy about the manner of his death and demonstrated the supreme authority of Roman power in Judea.
"Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.”" — Pilate’s challenge to the Jews to "judge him by your own law" wasn't just a suggestion; it was a pointed attempt to shift responsibility, forcing them to acknowledge their desire for Jesus' death. Th…
