Job 24:2-3
Some move landmarks; they seize flocks and pasture them. They drive away the donkey of the fatherless; they take the widow’s ox for a pledge.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's striking here is that the wicked aren't just stealing; they're openly flaunting their ill-gotten gains. Removing landmarks isn't a secret crime; it's a public defiance of boundaries, just as driving off and grazing a neighbor's flock in broad daylight shows a complete disregard for justice and accountability.
Job is wrestling with why the wicked seem to prosper, and in this passage, he describes specific examples of injustice. He's pointing out how people can get away with extreme wrongdoing, like illegally seizing property by moving boundary markers or outright stealing and using livestock. This sets up his larger lament that such brazen iniquity often goes unpunished in this life, questioning God's justice.
Imagine your property line. What if someone secretly moved the stones marking your land, claiming more for themselves? Job paints a picture of this, showing a deep offense against justice.
Job highlights a particularly brazen form of theft: moving landmarks. In ancient times, these weren't just stones; they were the legal definition of ownership, often marked by sacred pillars.
Stealing More Than Land
It's one thing to steal a little; it's another to openly take someone's livelihood and use it as your own. Job describes this kind of bold injustice.
The second part of Job 24:2 describes a chillingly open act of theft: seizing flocks and pasturing them as if they were one's own.
Beyond Simple Theft
Understand the original words
gebul · Hebrew Noun
In a legal or covenantal context, these are markers used to define property boundaries; moving them was a severe offense in ancient Israelite law, signaling land theft and social injustice. It symbolizes the violation of God-ordained order and rights.
yathowm · Hebrew Noun
Referring to children who have lost their father, they are frequently cited in Scripture as the most vulnerable members of society, whom God specifically commands His people to protect and care for. Neglecting them is a grave sin.
almanah · Hebrew Noun
A woman whose husband has died; like the fatherless, the widow is a primary object of divine concern and protection in the Bible. Taking advantage of a widow is considered a direct challenge to God's justice.
The ancient Near East had a strong tradition of protecting property rights, especially land boundaries. Job's accusation reflects a common and deeply resented form of injustice where powerful individuals would literally steal land and livestock, knowing that legal or divine recourse might be slow or non-existent.
c. 1400 BC - 1000 BC
Patriarchal Period and Early Israelite Settlement
During this era, land ownership was established, and preserving property boundaries was crucial for tribal and family inheritance. The removal of landmarks was a serious offense, disrupting the social and economic order.
c. 1400 BC
Codification of Laws Against Landmark Removal
The Mosaic Law, likely being formed or disseminated, explicitly condemned the removal of landmarks, underscoring its severity. This shows the practice was a known and pervasive problem that required divine prohibition.
c. 1000 BC - 500 BC— this verse
Period of Judges and Early Monarchy
This was a time of both internal strife and external threats for ancient Israel. Social injustices, including land grabbing and theft, were common as central authority could be weak or corrupt, making the pronouncements in Job highly relevant.
c. 900 BC
Possible Composition of the Book of Job
This passage directly echoes Job's sentiment by explicitly forbidding the removal of a neighbor's landmark, highlighting this act as a foundational violation of justice and property rights.
Hosea 5:10This verse parallels Job's description by condemning those who 'move the landmarks,' connecting this specific act of theft and injustice to God's judgment and wrath.
Proverbs 22:28Similar to Job's observation, Proverbs warns against removing ancient landmarks, framing it as an act that erases ancestral boundaries and brings ruin.
Jeremiah 17:11This verse offers a contrasting outcome to Job's observation of wicked prosperity, declaring that ill-gotten gains, like those obtained by moving landmarks or seizing property, will ultimately be lost and bring no true satisfaction.
bensonJob 24:2: "Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof."
Job 24:2 . Some, &c. — In proof that wicked persons prosper, he instances in two sorts of unrighteous people, whom all the world saw thriving in their iniquity: 1st, Tyrants, and those that did wrong under pretence of law and authority; and, 2d, Robbers and plunderers, that did wrong by downright force, as the bands of the Sabeans and Chaldeans, who had lately plundered him. Remove the landmark — By which…
ellicottJob 24:2: "Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof."
(2) Some remove the landmarks. —Now follows a description of the wrong-doings of various classes of men. The removal of landmarks was expressly provided against by the Mosaic Law ( Deuteronomy 19:14 ; Deuteronomy 27:17 ). And feed thereof.—Rather, probably, feed them: i.e., pasture them, the more easy to do when the landmarks are so removed.
What's striking here is that the wicked aren't just stealing; they're openly flaunting their ill-gotten gains. Removing landmarks isn't a secret crime; it's a public defiance of boundaries, just as driving off and grazing a neighbor's flock in broad daylight shows a complete disregard for justice and accountability.
Job is wrestling with why the wicked seem to prosper, and in this passage, he describes specific examples of injustice. He's pointing out how people can get away with extreme wrongdoing, like illegally seizing property by moving boundary markers or outright stealing and using livestock. This sets up his larger lament that such brazen iniquity often goes unpunished in this life, questioning God's justice.
Job is wrestling with why the wicked seem to prosper, and in this passage, he describes specific examples of injustice. He's pointing out how people can get away with extreme wrongdoing, like illegally seizing property by moving boundary markers or outright stealing and using livestock. This sets up his larger lament that such brazen iniquity often goes unpunished in this life, questioning God's justice.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Job 24:2-3 is available in the Sola app.
chabol · Hebrew Noun
A security deposit or collateral given to ensure the repayment of a debt. Biblical law restricted the taking of essential items as pledges to protect the poor from exploitation.
The book of Job is traditionally placed within this broad timeframe, reflecting the struggles and questions of ancient Near Eastern societies regarding divine justice and the prosperity of the wicked.
"Some move landmarks; they seize flocks and pasture them. They drive away the donkey of the fatherless; they take the widow’s ox for a pledge." — What's striking here is that the wicked aren't just stealing; they're openly flaunting their ill-gotten gains. Removing landmarks isn't a secret crime; it's a public defiance of boundaries, just as d…
