Some move landmarks; they seize flocks and pasture them. They drive away the donkey of the fatherless; they take the widow’s ox for a pledge.
English Standard Version (ESV)
The verse highlights a subtle but profound defiance: the wicked not only steal possessions but openly graze the stolen flocks, showing no shame or fear. This isn't just about taking what isn't theirs; it's about brazenly displaying their ill-gotten gains as if they were rightfully earned.
Some move landmarks; they seize flocks and pasture them. They drive away the donkey of the fatherless; they take the widow’s ox for a pledge.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Job is illustrating his complaint that God doesn't always punish the wicked in this life. He's describing various types of oppressors, from those who manipulate the law to outright thieves and plunderers, pointing out how they seem to get away with their cruel actions. This verse specifically highlights those who physically steal and seize property, like moving boundary markers to steal land or violently taking livestock for their own gain.
Ever feel like the rules don't apply to everyone? Job points to a very specific way people cheat the system, and it starts with moving a single stone.
In ancient times, especially in open fields, landmarks were crucial. These weren't just rocks; they were the physical lines that protected people's property and livelihoods. Job describes a type of wicked person who literally moves these stones, erasing the boundaries that define ownership.
The Crime of Shifting Boundaries
It's one thing to steal, but what about brazenly flaunting the stolen goods? Job paints a picture of thieves who don't even bother to hide their crime.
Ask a follow-up
After describing the act of moving landmarks, Job immediately points to the consequence: seizing livestock. This wasn't a subtle act; it was a violent appropriation that happened in plain sight.
From Boundaries to Plunder
Understand the original words
gebul · Hebrew Noun
In a legal or covenantal context, these are markers used to define property boundaries; moving them was a severe offense in ancient Israelite law, signaling land theft and social injustice. It symbolizes the violation of God-ordained order and rights.
yathowm · Hebrew Noun
Referring to children who have lost their father, they are frequently cited in Scripture as the most vulnerable members of society, whom God specifically commands His people to protect and care for. Neglecting them is a grave sin.
almanah · Hebrew Noun
A woman whose husband has died; like the fatherless, the widow is a primary object of divine concern and protection in the Bible. Taking advantage of a widow is considered a direct challenge to God's justice.
chabol · Hebrew Noun
A security deposit or collateral given to ensure the repayment of a debt. Biblical law restricted the taking of essential items as pledges to protect the poor from exploitation.
Job's description of removing landmarks and seizing flocks reflects a pervasive social injustice where the powerful openly disregard property rights, a problem deeply rooted in ancient Near Eastern legal and social structures, and amplified during times of political instability.
c. 2000-1500 BC
Early Bronze Age Property Division
Cultures in the ancient Near East establish and mark land boundaries to define property ownership, often using stones or posts as landmarks in open fields.
c. 1400 BC
Patriarchal Period
Abraham and his descendants move through the land, navigating tribal agreements and property rights, where respect for boundaries is crucial for peaceful coexistence.
c. 1250 BC
Exodus and Lawgiving
Moses receives the Law, which includes strict prohibitions against removing landmarks, reflecting the severity of this offense as a violation of divine and social order.
c. 1000 BC
United Monarchy
Under kings like David and Solomon, established legal systems and land ownership are maintained, though such offenses would still occur.
c. 900-700 BC— this verse
Divided Monarchy
The kingdoms of Israel and Judah experience periods of internal instability and external threats, creating opportunities for the powerful to oppress the weak.
c. 722 BC
Fall of Samaria
The Northern Kingdom of Israel is conquered by the Assyrians, leading to widespread displacement and social upheaval, exacerbating the problem of land grabbing.
This passage directly echoes Job's sentiment, explicitly cursing anyone who moves a neighbor's landmark, highlighting the severity and ancient recognition of this injustice.
Proverbs 22:28This proverb reinforces the idea that removing property boundaries is a serious transgression, linking it to the broader theme of maintaining rightful possessions and avoiding divine displeasure.
Hosea 5:10This prophetic verse uses the imagery of moving landmarks to illustrate the widespread corruption and injustice that God condemns in the land, showing this practice as a symptom of deeper societal decay.
Luke 3:14While not directly about property, the soldiers' question about extorting money connects to the theme of unjust gain and exploitation that Job describes with the removal of landmarks and seizure of flocks.
bensonJob 24:2: "Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof."
Job 24:2 . Some, &c. — In proof that wicked persons prosper, he instances in two sorts of unrighteous people, whom all the world saw thriving in their iniquity: 1st, Tyrants, and those that did wrong under pretence of law and authority; and, 2d, Robbers and plunderers, that did wrong by downright force, as the bands of the Sabeans and Chaldeans, who had lately plundered him. Remove the landmark — By which…
ellicottJob 24:2: "Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof."
(2) Some remove the landmarks. —Now follows a description of the wrong-doings of various classes of men. The removal of landmarks was expressly provided against by the Mosaic Law ( Deuteronomy 19:14 ; Deuteronomy 27:17 ). And feed thereof.—Rather, probably, feed them: i.e., pasture them, the more easy to do when the landmarks are so removed.
The verse highlights a subtle but profound defiance: the wicked not only steal possessions but openly graze the stolen flocks, showing no shame or fear. This isn't just about taking what isn't theirs; it's about brazenly displaying their ill-gotten gains as if they were rightfully earned.
Job is illustrating his complaint that God doesn't always punish the wicked in this life. He's describing various types of oppressors, from those who manipulate the law to outright thieves and plunderers, pointing out how they seem to get away with their cruel actions. This verse specifically highlights those who physically steal and seize property, like moving boundary markers to steal land or violently taking livestock for their own gain.
Job is illustrating his complaint that God doesn't always punish the wicked in this life. He's describing various types of oppressors, from those who manipulate the law to outright thieves and plunderers, pointing out how they seem to get away with their cruel actions. This verse specifically highlights those who physically steal and seize property, like moving boundary markers to steal land or violently taking livestock for their own gain.
"Some move landmarks; they seize flocks and pasture them. They drive away the donkey of the fatherless; they take the widow’s ox for a pledge." — The verse highlights a subtle but profound defiance: the wicked not only steal possessions but openly graze the stolen flocks, showing no shame or fear. This isn't just about taking what isn't theirs…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026