Galatians 3:21-22
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Paul’s question isn't just about whether the Law contradicts the promises, but whether it could replace them. He’s pointing out that even the most perfect law imaginable wouldn't have the power to give life, which is the very thing the promises offer through faith.
Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law. But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Paul is addressing the Galatians' tendency to revert to following the Law to be made right with God, which he argues would nullify God's promise made to Abraham. He's countering the idea that the Law supersedes or opposes the promise, explaining instead that the Law's role was temporary and preparatory. This verse directly tackles the question of whether the Law and the promises are in conflict.
Paul faces a big question: Is God's Law actually working against His promises? His answer is a resounding 'no!' But he clarifies why.
Paul argues that the Law itself is incapable of giving life. It's like a perfect blueprint for a building that can't actually construct the house. The Law reveals God's perfect standard, and in doing so, it exposes our inability to meet that standard. It shows us our sin and our need for a Savior, but it can't provide that salvation or the life that comes from it. Think of it this way: the Law can tell you exactly what a healthy diet is, but it can't make you healthy. That requires something more – the power to actually follow the diet, or a different path to health altogether.
If the Law can't save us, what is it good for? Paul makes it clear that the Law has a crucial role, not in providing salvation, but in preparing us for it.
The Law isn't God's enemy; it's actually an essential part of His plan to bring us to Himself. Its primary function, in this context, is to expose our sinfulness and our inability to achieve righteousness on our own. By showing us the perfect standard we fail to meet, the Law drives us to realize our desperate need for God's grace. It acts like a skilled doctor who diagnoses an illness, not to condemn the patient, but to show them the necessity of seeking a cure. The Law points us away from trusting in ourselves and toward the promise of salvation found in Christ.
Understand the original words
Ask a follow-up
nomos · Greek Noun
A divine rule or system of regulations, often referring to the Mosaic law given at Sinai, which serves to reveal God's standard of holiness and human sinfulness but cannot provide salvation.
epaggelia · Greek Noun
A declaration or oath of God expressing His gracious commitment to act on behalf of His people, culminating in the fulfillment found in Christ.
dikaiosynē · Greek Noun
A state of moral uprightness or conformity to God's standard; in the New Testament, it is often used as a status given to believers by God through faith in Christ rather than by works.
graphē · Greek Noun
In this context, the divinely inspired writings of the Old Testament, which serve as the authoritative testimony to God's dealings with humanity.
hamartia · Greek Noun
A missing of the mark; the condition of rebellion against God, alienation from His will, and the resulting state of spiritual condemnation.
pistis · Greek Noun
Trusting reliance upon God and His work; in the New Testament, it refers specifically to belief in the person and finished work of Jesus Christ as the means of salvation.
Christos · Greek Proper Noun
The Anointed One (Messiah); the eternal Son of God who became human to fulfill the law, die for sins, and rise again, serving as the sole mediator between God and humanity.
pisteuō · Greek Verb
A term describing one who puts their trust or confidence in something or someone, specifically one who relies on the message of the Gospel.
Paul confronts the Galatians' misunderstanding that the Mosaic Law, given after God's promises to Abraham, somehow contradicts or invalidates those promises. He argues that the Law's purpose was to reveal sin and create a need for the very promises of God fulfilled in Christ, not to provide a path to life on its own.
c. 1446 BC
Giving of the Law at Mount Sinai
God gives the Mosaic Law to the Israelites through Moses, mediated by angels. This event establishes a covenant based on obedience to the law.
c. 1445 BC - 445 BC
Period of the Law
The Law of Moses functions as the primary guide for Israel's religious and civil life, revealing God's standards and highlighting human sinfulness.
c. 450 BC
Ezra Reforms and Temple Reconstruction
Following the return from Babylonian exile, Ezra leads a religious reformation emphasizing strict adherence to the Law and rebuilding of the Jerusalem Temple.
c. 5 BC - AD 30/33
Ministry of Jesus Christ
Jesus fulfills the Law and the promises made to Abraham, demonstrating that righteousness and eternal life come through faith in Him, not by legalistic observance.
c. AD 40-50
Paul's Missionary Journeys
Paul preaches the gospel of salvation by faith in Christ throughout the Roman Empire, encountering resistance from those who insist on adherence to the Mosaic Law.
c. AD 50-55— this verse
Writing of the Epistle to the Galatians
Paul writes to the churches in Galatia to counter false teachings that require Gentiles to be circumcised and obey the Mosaic Law for salvation.
This passage highlights how the law, while intended to be life-giving, actually revealed sin and led to death because of human inability to perfectly keep it, echoing Galatians 3:21's point that no law given could grant life.
Romans 8:3This verse explains that God sent his Son in human likeness to condemn sin in the flesh, addressing the very problem the law couldn't solve – humanity's inability to overcome sin, which is central to why the law couldn't give life or righteousness.
Hebrews 7:19This passage states that the law made nothing perfect, underscoring the insufficiency of the law to achieve righteousness or life, which directly supports the argument in Galatians 3:21 that a law capable of conferring life would have been necessary if righteousness were by law.
Romans 5:20This verse shows that where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, illustrating the contrast Paul is drawing: the law magnified sin, whereas the promise (through grace) offers life, reinforcing that the law's inability to give life is precisely why grace through faith is so essential.
vincentGalatians 3:21: "Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law."
Against the promises (κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν)Does it follow from the difference between the law and the promises that they are in antagonism? Paul supposes this objection on the part of a Jewish Christian.God forbid (μὴ γένοιτο)See on Romans 3:4. This could only be true in case the law gave life, for life m…
barnesGalatians 3:21: "Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law."
Is the law then against the promises of God? - Is the Law of Moses to be regarded as opposed to the promises made to Abraham? Does this follow from any view which can be taken of the subject? The object of the apostle in asking this question is, evidently, to take an opportunity to deny in the most positive ma…
Paul’s question isn't just about whether the Law contradicts the promises, but whether it could replace them. He’s pointing out that even the most perfect law imaginable wouldn't have the power to give life, which is the very thing the promises offer through faith.
Paul is addressing the Galatians' tendency to revert to following the Law to be made right with God, which he argues would nullify God's promise made to Abraham. He's countering the idea that the Law supersedes or opposes the promise, explaining instead that the Law's role was temporary and preparatory. This verse directly tackles the question of whether the Law and the promises are in conflict.
Paul is addressing the Galatians' tendency to revert to following the Law to be made right with God, which he argues would nullify God's promise made to Abraham. He's countering the idea that the Law supersedes or opposes the promise, explaining instead that the Law's role was temporary and preparatory. This verse directly tackles the question of whether the Law and the promises are in conflict.
"Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law. But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by fait…" — Paul’s question isn't just about whether the Law contradicts the promises, but whether it could replace them. He’s pointing out that even the most perfect law imaginable wouldn't have the power t…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
