Galatians 3:15
To give a human example, brothers: even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Paul uses a human agreement as an analogy, but the truly astonishing part is how human covenants, even simple ones, are fiercely protected from alteration once ratified. This highlights how utterly inviolable God's own promises must be, far surpassing any human agreement in their permanence and truth.
Paul uses a common human example to illustrate his point: once a contract or covenant, even a human one, is finalized and ratified, it cannot be altered or canceled by anyone, not even the one who made it. This sets up his argument that God's promise to Abraham, made long before the Law, is similarly unchangeable and therefore not superseded by it.
Ever made a deal or signed a contract? You know how important it is for things to be clear and final. Paul uses a common human experience to make a profound point about God's promises.
Paul begins by saying, 'I speak after the manner of men.' This means he's using an illustration from everyday human life to explain a spiritual truth.
The Binding Nature of Human Covenants
He points out that even a simple human agreement, once it's been properly made and confirmed (signed, sealed, ratified), is considered final. No one can just step in and cancel it or add new rules to it without consequence. It's a matter of basic fairness and respect for agreements.
An Argument from the Less to the Greater
Paul uses this 'lesser' example (a human agreement) to highlight something much 'greater' – God's covenant with Abraham. If even humans recognize the importance of sticking to confirmed agreements, how much more should we trust that God, who is perfectly faithful, will uphold His promises?
Paul is building a case for why the Galatians should trust God's original promise. He's about to show how this human analogy leads to a startling conclusion about God's covenant.
The key point Paul is making is about the nature of God's covenant with Abraham.
Promise vs. Law
Paul contrasts the original promise made to Abraham with the Law given later. The human covenant analogy is used to argue that the later addition (the Law) cannot change or override the original covenant (the promise).
The Law Cannot Annul God's Promise
Paul's argument implies that if a human agreement, once ratified, cannot be altered, then God's established covenant with Abraham – a covenant based on His promise – certainly cannot be annulled or added to by the Law, which came much later. The Law, in this context, is presented as something that came the promise and could not invalidate it.
Understand the original words
diathēkē · Greek Noun
A solemn, binding agreement or promise between parties. Biblically, it refers to the formal arrangements God makes with humanity, characterized by unconditional faithfulness on His part and requiring response from the people.
Paul uses the analogy of a human contract, which, once ratified, cannot be altered or added to, to emphasize that the divine covenant with Abraham, established by promise, remains eternally valid and unchangeable, despite the later introduction of the Mosaic Law.
c. 2000 BC
God's Covenant with Abraham
God establishes a foundational covenant with Abraham, promising numerous descendants and blessings through his lineage.
c. 1446 BC
The Exodus from Egypt
The Israelites are miraculously delivered from slavery in Egypt, a pivotal event signifying God's faithfulness to His covenant promises.
c. 1446 BC— this verse
The Giving of the Law at Sinai
God gives the Mosaic Law to the Israelites, establishing a new covenant relationship centered on obedience to His commands.
c. 1000 BC
Davidic Kingdom Established
The establishment of the united monarchy under King David, with further promises of an everlasting dynasty, reinforcing the covenant lineage.
This passage describes God's covenant with Abraham, which is the foundational promise Paul is referencing and arguing cannot be annulled or added to by the Law.
Deuteronomy 27:26This verse pronounces a curse on anyone who does not uphold all the words of the Law, highlighting a fundamental difference between the conditional nature of the Law and the unconditional promise to Abraham.
Romans 4:13-16Paul makes a similar argument here, emphasizing that the promise to Abraham and his offspring came through the righteousness of faith, not through the Law, which would add conditions and thus nullify the promise.
Hebrews 6:16-17This passage uses the idea of human covenants being confirmed by an oath to illustrate God's own unchangeable purpose in His promises, reinforcing the idea that God's covenants are final and binding.
Galatians 3:17This verse directly follows Paul's analogy, specifying that the Law, given 430 years later, could not annul the covenant God had previously ratified with Abraham, thus making the promise of none effect.
jfbGalatians 3:15: "Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto."
- I speak after the manner of men—I take an illustration from a merely human transaction of everyday occurrence.but a man's covenant—whose purpose it is far less important to maintain.if it be confirmed—when once it hath been ratified.no man disannulleth—"none setteth aside," not even the author himself, much less any second party. Non…
vincentGalatians 3:15: "Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto."
After the manner of men (κατὰ ἄνθρωπον)According to human analogy; reasoning as men would reason in ordinary affairs. The phrase is peculiar to Paul. See Romans 3:5; 1 Corinthians 3:3; 1 Corinthians 9:8; 1 Corinthians 15:32; Galatians 1:11. Comp. ἀνθρώπινος as a man, Romans 6:19.Though it be - yetThe A.V. and Rev. give the correct s…
Paul uses a human agreement as an analogy, but the truly astonishing part is how human covenants, even simple ones, are fiercely protected from alteration once ratified. This highlights how utterly inviolable God's own promises must be, far surpassing any human agreement in their permanence and truth.
Paul uses a common human example to illustrate his point: once a contract or covenant, even a human one, is finalized and ratified, it cannot be altered or canceled by anyone, not even the one who made it. This sets up his argument that God's promise to Abraham, made long before the Law, is similarly unchangeable and therefore not superseded by it.
Paul uses a common human example to illustrate his point: once a contract or covenant, even a human one, is finalized and ratified, it cannot be altered or canceled by anyone, not even the one who made it. This sets up his argument that God's promise to Abraham, made long before the Law, is similarly unchangeable and therefore not superseded by it.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Galatians 3:15 is available in the Sola app.
586 BC
Fall of Jerusalem and Babylonian Exile
The destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, leading to the exile of many Israelites, raising questions about the continuity of God's promises.
c. 450 BC
Return from Exile and Rebuilding
The return of some Israelites from exile and the rebuilding of the Temple and Jerusalem, under Persian rule.
"To give a human example, brothers: even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified." — Paul uses a human agreement as an analogy, but the truly astonishing part is how human covenants, even simple ones, are fiercely protected from alteration once ratified. This highlights how utterly…
