Galatians 2:6
And from those who seemed to be influential (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)—those, I say, who seemed influential added nothing to me.
English Standard Version (ESV)
Galatians 2:6
And from those who seemed to be influential (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)—those, I say, who seemed influential added nothing to me.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Paul emphasizes that even though these influential figures had significant standing, their "influence" added nothing to him. This highlights that his apostolic authority and understanding of the Gospel weren't dependent on external validation from even the most respected leaders of the early church.
Paul recounts his visit to Jerusalem to meet with the other apostles, emphasizing that he met with them privately to ensure his message wasn't preached in vain. He then clarifies that despite the esteemed status of these leaders, their reputation and authority added nothing significant to his own understanding or mission, as God shows no favoritism.
Paul throws a powerful statement about God into the middle of his defense. Why is this crucial for understanding his encounter with the 'influential' apostles?
Paul asserts that 'God shows no partiality.' This isn't just a theological nicety; it's the bedrock of his argument. He's saying that divine approval isn't based on human reputation, position, or even past experience.
Paul uses the phrase 'those who seemed to be influential' with a subtle, yet powerful, meaning. What was he really saying about their status and his own?
Paul acknowledges that certain leaders seemed to be influential – they had a reputation. However, he emphasizes that this external status didn't grant them authority over him or add anything to his own God-given mission.
Understand the original words
prosōpolēmpsia · Greek Noun
A theological term describing God as not favoring one person or group over another based on external characteristics like status, wealth, or ethnicity; He judges justly and impartially.
This verse highlights the tension surrounding apostolic authority in the early church. The Jerusalem Council was a critical moment where Paul's independence and the inclusion of Gentiles were affirmed, yet the need for such a declaration underscores ongoing debates about the gospel's core message and its messengers.
c. AD 30s
Jesus' Ministry and Ascension
Jesus Christ completes His earthly ministry, is crucified, and rises again. His immediate followers, including Peter, James, and John, become His core apostles.
c. AD 30s-40s
Paul's Conversion and Early Ministry
Saul of Tarsus, a persecutor of Christians, has a dramatic conversion experience and becomes the Apostle Paul. He begins his ministry, primarily to Gentiles, independent of the original apostles.
c. AD 48-49— this verse
The Jerusalem Council
A pivotal council is held in Jerusalem to address the issue of Gentile inclusion and the requirement of circumcision. Paul, Peter, and others debate the matter, ultimately affirming that Gentiles do not need to follow Jewish law.
c. AD 50s
Paul's Contested Authority
Following the Jerusalem Council, some Judaizers continue to challenge Paul's apostolic authority and the validity of his gospel for Gentiles. This leads Paul to write letters defending his mission.
This passage directly informs the phrase 'God shows no partiality,' emphasizing that God accepts all who fear Him, regardless of their background or status.
Romans 2:11Similar to Galatians 2:6, this verse reiterates the impartiality of God, stating He shows no favoritism and will judge everyone according to their deeds, not their social standing.
2 Corinthians 12:11Paul here defends his apostleship, echoing the sentiment of Galatians 2:6 by suggesting that although he may seem 'lesser' than the 'super-apostles,' he has done nothing inferior to them, highlighting a consistent theme of asserting his divinely appointed authority.
James 2:1This passage warns against showing favoritism based on a person's status ('rich' or 'poor'), which directly aligns with Paul's assertion that 'God shows no partiality' and His judgment is not based on outward appearances.
1 Corinthians 15:9Paul refers to himself as 'the least of the apostles' here, which illuminates his use of 'seemed to be influential' in Galatians 2:6. It shows he is aware of perceived status differences but asserts his equality in Christ and God's eyes.
ellicottGalatians 2:6: "But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:"
(6) The Apostle returns from his digression on the case of Titus to give the result of his experience with the elder Apostles, in continuation of Galatians 2:3 . “I did indeed hold conference with them privately; but with all their advantages, real or assumed, I learnt nothing from them th…
cambridgeGalatians 2:6: "But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:"
6 . But of these ] Rather, “But from those”. The sentence would have run regularly—“From those of reputation … I gained no new enlightenment”, but having been interrupted by a parenthesis (whatsoever … person) the structure is changed. “To me, I say, these eminent persons gave no new instr…
Paul emphasizes that even though these influential figures had significant standing, their "influence" added nothing to him. This highlights that his apostolic authority and understanding of the Gospel weren't dependent on external validation from even the most respected leaders of the early church.
Paul recounts his visit to Jerusalem to meet with the other apostles, emphasizing that he met with them privately to ensure his message wasn't preached in vain. He then clarifies that despite the esteemed status of these leaders, their reputation and authority added nothing significant to his own understanding or mission, as God shows no favoritism.
Paul recounts his visit to Jerusalem to meet with the other apostles, emphasizing that he met with them privately to ensure his message wasn't preached in vain. He then clarifies that despite the esteemed status of these leaders, their reputation and authority added nothing significant to his own understanding or mission, as God shows no favoritism.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Galatians 2:6 is available in the Sola app.
c. AD 50s
Paul's Letter to the Galatians
Paul writes his letter to the churches in Galatia to combat the influence of Judaizers who are insisting on the necessity of circumcision and adherence to the Mosaic Law for Gentile believers.
"And from those who seemed to be influential (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)—those, I say, who seemed influential added nothing to me." — Paul emphasizes that even though these influential figures had significant standing, their "influence" added nothing to him. This highlights that his apostolic authority and understanding of the Go…