Galatians 2:14
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Paul points out the stark inconsistency in Peter's actions: Peter, a Jew, was living freely among Gentiles, yet by separating from them when other Jews arrived, he effectively pressured Gentile believers into adopting Jewish customs. This wasn't just about food laws; it was about a practical, hypocritical pressure that undermined the gospel's truth that salvation is by faith alone, not by adhering to Jewish ritual.
But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?”
English Standard Version (ESV)
Paul directly confronts Peter in front of the entire church in Antioch because Peter has separated himself from Gentile believers. This action, taken after Jewish officials arrived, contradicts the gospel's message of unity and freedom in Christ. Paul questions Peter's hypocrisy: how can he, a Jew who has lived among Gentiles, now force Gentile believers to adopt Jewish customs?
Peter, a pillar of the church, was found to be 'halting' in his steps. What does it mean to walk 'uprightly' with the gospel, and why is it so crucial?
The phrase 'walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel' is a powerful image. It suggests a lack of integrity, a wavering, or a crooked path in how Peter and others were living out their faith.
Peter's actions spoke louder than words, creating a 'compulsion' for others. How does our behavior influence those around us, especially in matters of faith?
Paul’s question to Peter is sharp: 'Why do you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?' This wasn't about Peter issuing direct commands, but about the powerful influence of his example.
Ask a follow-up
Understand the original words
euaggelion · Greek Noun
The 'good news' of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ; the proclamation of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ as the definitive revelation of God's grace.
Peter's actions in Antioch reveal a tension between lived experience and theological conviction, highlighting how social pressure and fear of offense can compromise even apostolic leadership. Paul's bold confrontation underscores the vital importance of upholding the gospel's truth about freedom from the law, especially when public example could lead others astray.
c. AD 49
Jerusalem Council
A major council of apostles and elders in Jerusalem debated whether Gentile converts needed to follow Jewish law, including dietary regulations. They ultimately decreed that Gentiles did not need to be circumcised or observe the Mosaic law to be part of the church.
c. AD 49-50
Peter visits Antioch
Following the Jerusalem Council, Peter visited the church in Antioch, which was a mixed community of Jewish and Gentile believers. He initially associated freely with the Gentile Christians.
c. AD 49-50
Delegation from James arrives in Antioch
A delegation, possibly sent by James (the brother of Jesus, a leader in the Jerusalem church), arrived in Antioch. Their presence seems to have caused anxiety among Jewish Christians, and perhaps among Peter himself, regarding adherence to Jewish customs.
c. AD 49-50— this verse
Peter withdraws from Gentile believers
Under the influence of the visiting delegation, Peter separated himself from the Gentile believers, ceasing to eat with them. This action was a public statement that contradicted the decision of the Jerusalem Council and implied that Gentile believers were not fully accepted without adhering to Jewish customs.
c. AD 49-50
Paul confronts Peter in Antioch
The Apostle Paul publicly rebuked Peter for his inconsistent behavior, stating that his actions were not in line with the truth of the gospel. Paul argued that if Peter, as a Jew, had been living freely with Gentiles, he shouldn't pressure Gentile believers to adopt Jewish practices.
This passage shows a similar conflict arising in the early church, where some Jewish believers insisted that Gentile converts must be circumcised and obey the Mosaic Law, directly mirroring the pressure Peter was putting on Gentiles in Antioch.
1 Corinthians 9:19-23Paul explains his own approach to ministry here, which is to adapt to different groups to win them to Christ. This passage provides context for Paul's argument that Peter's behavior was inconsistent with this principle of adaptive evangelism.
Romans 14:1-6This passage addresses disputes over disputable matters, like dietary laws, and emphasizes that believers should not judge one another. It highlights the underlying principle of Christian liberty that Paul was defending in Galatians 2:14.
Colossians 2:16-17These verses speak to the obsolescence of the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament, showing they were 'a shadow of things to come' and not binding on Christians. This supports Paul's argument that Peter was wrongly imposing these laws on Gentiles.
vincentGalatians 2:14: "But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?"
See additional note at the end of this chapter.Walked not uprightly (ὀρθοποδοῦσιν)Lit. are not walking. N.T.o. olxx. oClass. Lit. to be straight-footed.Being a Jew (ὑπάρχων)The verb means originally to begin; thence to…
bengelGalatians 2:14: "But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?"
Galatians 2:14 . Ἐ͂ ιδον , I saw ) A happy observation [of their error].— ὀρθοποδοῦσι ) they walk [ with a straightforward and open step ] according to the rule, Galatians 6:16 ; in the right way, or rather with body erect…
Paul points out the stark inconsistency in Peter's actions: Peter, a Jew, was living freely among Gentiles, yet by separating from them when other Jews arrived, he effectively pressured Gentile believers into adopting Jewish customs. This wasn't just about food laws; it was about a practical, hypocritical pressure that undermined the gospel's truth that salvation is by faith alone, not by adhering to Jewish ritual.
Paul directly confronts Peter in front of the entire church in Antioch because Peter has separated himself from Gentile believers. This action, taken after Jewish officials arrived, contradicts the gospel's message of unity and freedom in Christ. Paul questions Peter's hypocrisy: how can he, a Jew who has lived among Gentiles, now force Gentile believers to adopt Jewish customs?
Paul directly confronts Peter in front of the entire church in Antioch because Peter has separated himself from Gentile believers. This action, taken after Jewish officials arrived, contradicts the gospel's message of unity and freedom in Christ. Paul questions Peter's hypocrisy: how can he, a Jew who has lived among Gentiles, now force Gentile believers to adopt Jewish customs?
"But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?”" — Paul points out the stark inconsistency in Peter's actions: Peter, a Jew, was living freely among Gentiles, yet by separating from them when other Jews arrived, he effectively pressured Gentile belie…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
