Exodus 22:9
For every breach of trust, whether it is for an ox, for a donkey, for a sheep, for a cloak, or for any kind of lost thing, of which one says, ‘This is it,’ the case of both parties shall come before God. The one whom God condemns shall pay double to his neighbor.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The verse isn't just about theft; it's about breaches of trust in general, covering everything from livestock to clothing. The emphasis on "which another challengeth to be his" highlights that the core issue is a dispute over rightful ownership or possession, bringing accusations of wrongdoing before God for resolution. This means that even in everyday disagreements over possessions, there's a spiritual dimension that requires justice and accountability.
This verse follows laws about property damage and theft, specifically dealing with negligence and responsibility when items are entrusted to another. It expands on the principle of restitution for stolen goods by outlining a judicial process for resolving disputes where one person claims an item belongs to them, and it precedes further laws concerning property and communal responsibility.
When a possession goes missing, our minds often jump straight to theft. But this ancient law speaks of 'trespass' in a broader sense, covering more than just outright stealing.
A Breach of Trust
Exodus 22:9 expands the idea of 'trespass' beyond simple theft. The phrases like 'for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing' highlight a range of possessions. More importantly, the condition 'which another challengeth to be his' points to disputed ownership or responsibility.
This wasn't just about finding a thief who stole an item outright. It covered situations where someone might have been entrusted with an item (like a deposit or loan) and it was lost, damaged, or claimed to be stolen, leading to a dispute. The core issue was a breach of trust concerning property.
The verse mentions 'judges' who bring condemnation. But who were these judges, and what gave them their authority?
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Exodus 22:9 is available in the Sola app.
Divine Authority Delegated
The text states, 'the cause of both parties shall come before the judges; and whom the judges shall condemn, he shall pay double.' The word used for 'judges' here, 'elohim,' can mean 'gods' or, more commonly in this context, it refers to human judges.
This highlights a crucial principle: God established human authorities to administer justice. These judges were seen as representatives of God's own authority on earth. Their role was to hear both sides, examine the evidence, and make a just ruling, reflecting God's own standard of righteousness. When they condemned someone, it was seen as God's condemnation.
The penalty for being condemned is 'double.' What does this severe consequence signify?
Restoring Balance and Deterring Deceit
The requirement to 'pay double' is a significant penalty designed to address the breach of trust and deter dishonesty.
Understand the original words
pesha · Hebrew Noun
Refers to a violation of confidence or a broken agreement where one party has failed to honor a commitment, often involving dishonest dealing regarding property or care. It signals a failure in the covenantal responsibilities required of neighbors.
This passage shows a direct application of restitution for wrongdoing, where Zacchaeus, after encountering Jesus, commits to repaying double to anyone he had defrauded, echoing the principle of making amends found in Exodus.
2 Samuel 12:6Nathan the prophet uses a story to illustrate God's judgment on David's sin, including the punishment of repaying fourfold for a sheep, which highlights the concept of severe restitution for theft and injustice.
Proverbs 6:30-31This proverb speaks to the societal understanding of theft, noting that while stealing from the poor might go unnoticed by humans, God's justice demands a far greater restitution than if the thief had been caught and judged by human authorities.
Matthew 5:38-40Jesus contrasts the Old Testament law with His teaching on non-retaliation, but the principle of justice and fairness in resolving disputes, even when it involves settling with an opponent, is still a backdrop to understanding these laws.
calvinExodus 22:5-15: "If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man's field; of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution."
If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man's field; of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution.
Si depasci fecerit quispiam agrum aut vitem,…
clarkeExodus 22:9: "For all manner of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing, which another challengeth to be his, the cause of both parties shall come before the judges; and whom the judges shall condemn, he shall pay double unto his neighbour."
Challengeth to be his - It was necessary that such a matter should come before the judges, because the person in whose possession the goods were found might have had them by a fair and honest purchase…
The verse isn't just about theft; it's about breaches of trust in general, covering everything from livestock to clothing. The emphasis on "which another challengeth to be his" highlights that the core issue is a dispute over rightful ownership or possession, bringing accusations of wrongdoing before God for resolution. This means that even in everyday disagreements over possessions, there's a spiritual dimension that requires justice and accountability.
This verse follows laws about property damage and theft, specifically dealing with negligence and responsibility when items are entrusted to another. It expands on the principle of restitution for stolen goods by outlining a judicial process for resolving disputes where one person claims an item belongs to them, and it precedes further laws concerning property and communal responsibility.
This verse follows laws about property damage and theft, specifically dealing with negligence and responsibility when items are entrusted to another. It expands on the principle of restitution for stolen goods by outlining a judicial process for resolving disputes where one person claims an item belongs to them, and it precedes further laws concerning property and communal responsibility.
"For every breach of trust, whether it is for an ox, for a donkey, for a sheep, for a cloak, or for any kind of lost thing, of which one says, ‘This is it,’ the case of both parties shall come before God. The one whom God condemns shall pay…" — The verse isn't just about theft; it's about breaches of trust in general, covering everything from livestock to clothing. The emphasis on "which another challengeth to be his" highlights that the…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
