Exodus 22:2-3
If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him, but if the sun has risen on him, there shall be bloodguilt for him. He shall surely pay. If he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This passage highlights a crucial distinction: a thief caught in the act of forcible entry at night, leading to their death, carries no "bloodguilt" for the one who stopped them. This implies that in such extreme circumstances, the thief has forfeited their own right to life and safety by their violent intrusion.
This passage comes after laws concerning restitution for stolen property, particularly animals. Here, Moses outlines specific circumstances where the usual penalties and laws surrounding property damage and theft shift dramatically. The verses that follow will then detail the required restitution for various stolen animals if the thief is caught and not killed.
Why does the Bible make a distinction between killing a thief at night versus during the day? It’s more than just visibility.
This verse highlights a crucial distinction based on the circumstances of the offense:
The Cover of Darkness
When a thief is caught breaking in (often understood as digging through or forcing entry) at night, the homeowner is not held accountable if the thief is killed. The reasoning is twofold:
The Clarity of Daylight
The text implies that if this same act happened during the day, the situation changes. If a thief is caught in the act of stealing in daylight, killing them would likely incur bloodguilt. This is because:
The law is practical, recognizing that a desperate act of defense is understandable under the cover of darkness, but less so when the threat can be clearly seen and addressed through other means.
When someone breaks into your home with force, are they still considered part of the community? This verse suggests they might forfeit certain protections.
Understand the original words
damim · Hebrew Noun
The state of being held responsible for the shedding of innocent blood; it implies a legal and moral liability that requires atonement or judgment.
gannav · Hebrew Noun
In the context of biblical law, this refers to a person who illicitly takes the property of another, emphasizing the disruption of the neighborly relationship and the necessity of justice.
This passage establishes a fundamental principle: 'Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed.' Exodus 22:2 presents a specific exception to this rule, clarifying when shedding a 'thief's' blood does not incur guilt.
Exodus 21:12This verse states that 'Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death.' Exodus 22:2 provides a crucial distinction, explaining when a killing is not considered murder, specifically in the context of a nighttime break-in.
Numbers 35:27This passage speaks of avenging a murder and the responsibility for bloodguilt. Exodus 22:2 directly addresses a situation where the 'blood' of the slain thief is not to be accounted for, showing a specific instance of justifiable homicide in self-defense.
Deuteronomy 19:10-13This passage discusses what happens if innocent blood is shed, emphasizing the seriousness of murder. Exodus 22:2 provides a contrast by outlining a scenario where the blood of a criminal, killed during the commission of a crime, does not bring guilt upon the slayer.
Matthew 24:43Jesus uses the imagery of a householder not knowing when a thief would break in to illustrate the need for constant vigilance. Exodus 22:2 reflects this understanding of the thief's stealthy and dangerous nature, justifying a lethal response when caught in the act.
calvinExodus 22:1-4: "If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep."
- If a thief be found breaking up. This clause is to be taken separately, and is inserted by way of parenthesis; for, after having decreed the punishment, God adds in connection, "he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he should be sold for his theft;" and this exception as to the thief in the night is introduced parenthetically.…
clarkeExodus 22:2: "If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him."
If a thief be found - If a thief was found breaking into a house in the night season, he might be killed; but not if the sun had risen, for then he might be known and taken, and the restitution made which is mentioned in the succeeding verse. So by the law of England it is a burglary to break and enter a house by night; and "anciently the day was accounted to begin only from sunrisi…
This passage highlights a crucial distinction: a thief caught in the act of forcible entry at night, leading to their death, carries no "bloodguilt" for the one who stopped them. This implies that in such extreme circumstances, the thief has forfeited their own right to life and safety by their violent intrusion.
This passage comes after laws concerning restitution for stolen property, particularly animals. Here, Moses outlines specific circumstances where the usual penalties and laws surrounding property damage and theft shift dramatically. The verses that follow will then detail the required restitution for various stolen animals if the thief is caught and not killed.
This passage comes after laws concerning restitution for stolen property, particularly animals. Here, Moses outlines specific circumstances where the usual penalties and laws surrounding property damage and theft shift dramatically. The verses that follow will then detail the required restitution for various stolen animals if the thief is caught and not killed.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Exodus 22:2-3 is available in the Sola app.
This passage touches on the idea that a thief caught in the act of breaking in has, in a sense, severed their connection to the community and its protections.
From Citizen to Enemy
By forcing entry into a dwelling, especially under the cover of darkness, the thief transforms themselves from a fellow citizen into a potential aggressor. They are acting outside the established order and the trust that underpins society. This forceful intrusion is seen as a violation so severe that it justifies extreme measures for defense.
forfeiture of Rights
When an individual acts with such flagrant disregard for the property and safety of others, the law acknowledges that they may forfeit the right to be treated with the same leniency as someone caught stealing in a less aggressive manner. The act of 'breaking in' implies a level of violence and intent that puts the homeowner's life and well-being at immediate risk. Therefore, the response, even if lethal, is not considered murder because the aggressor initiated a situation where such a response became a necessary defense.
"If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him, but if the sun has risen on him, there shall be bloodguilt for him. He shall surely pay. If he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his…" — This passage highlights a crucial distinction: a thief caught in the act of forcible entry at night, leading to their death, carries no "bloodguilt" for the one who stopped them. This implies that…
