Exodus 22:14
“If a man borrows anything of his neighbor, and it is injured or dies, the owner not being with it, he shall make full restitution.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's easy to miss here is the crucial detail about the owner not being present. This isn't just about protecting property; it highlights how the borrower is entrusted with not only the item but the lender's trust, demanding extraordinary care. When the owner is absent, the borrower bears the full responsibility, making them accountable for anything that happens.
This passage addresses the responsibilities that come with borrowing, differentiating it from merely holding something for safekeeping. It directly follows laws about restitution for damaged fields, fires, and stolen goods, all within a larger section focused on protecting property and ensuring fairness. This specific rule underscores the borrower's duty to compensate the owner if the borrowed item is harmed or lost, especially when the owner isn't present to oversee its use.
When you borrow something, especially something precious or alive, what's your ultimate responsibility if something goes wrong?
This verse lays down a clear principle: if you borrow something from your neighbor and it gets damaged or dies, you're on the hook to make it right. The key condition is that the owner wasn't with it. This isn't about proving fault; it's about the responsibility that comes with benefiting from someone else's generosity.
Think about it: the lender is showing kindness and trust by letting you use their property, often for your own gain. Because the owner isn't there to oversee it, the borrower assumes a higher level of care. The expectation is that you'll return what you borrowed in the same condition you received it. If you can't, you must cover the full value. This encourages carefulness and respect for others' belongings.
Why would the presence of the owner matter when something is borrowed?
The phrase 'the owner thereof being not with it' is crucial. It establishes a line between the borrower's responsibility and the lender's potential involvement. If the owner is present, they can potentially prevent damage or oversee the use of their property. In such cases, the owner bears some of the risk because they are still in a position to protect their own goods.
However, when the owner entrusts their item to a borrower and isn't present, they are demonstrating significant trust. This trust comes with an expectation of faithful stewardship from the borrower. The law protects the lender from loss in these situations, ensuring that their generosity isn't exploited and that they won't be discouraged from lending in the future.
The parable of the Good Samaritan highlights the responsibility to help those in need, even at personal cost, echoing the principle that kindness shown should not lead to loss for the giver.
Proverbs 19:17This verse emphasizes that showing kindness to the poor is a loan to the Lord, suggesting that God honors and rewards generosity, even in secular transactions like lending.
Matthew 5:40Jesus' teaching to 'let the one who would sue you take your coat as well' speaks to a spirit of generosity that goes beyond strict legal obligation, though Exodus demands accountability for borrowed items.
Romans 13:8The command to 'owe no one anything, except to love one another' sets a high bar for relational responsibility, which this law supports by ensuring faithfulness in borrowed goods.
bensonExodus 22:14: "And if a man borrow ought of his neighbour, and it be hurt, or die, the owner thereof being not with it, he shall surely make it good."
Exodus 22:14-15 . If a man (suppose) lent his team to his neighbour, if the owner were with it, or were to receive profit for the loan of it, whatever harm befell the cattle the owner must stand to the loss of it; but if the owner were so kind to the borrower as to lend it him gratis, and put such a confidence in him as to trust it from under his…
calvinExodus 22:5-15: "If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man's field; of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution."
If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man's field; of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution.
Si depasci fecerit quispiam agrum aut vitem,…
What's easy to miss here is the crucial detail about the owner not being present. This isn't just about protecting property; it highlights how the borrower is entrusted with not only the item but the lender's trust, demanding extraordinary care. When the owner is absent, the borrower bears the full responsibility, making them accountable for anything that happens.
This passage addresses the responsibilities that come with borrowing, differentiating it from merely holding something for safekeeping. It directly follows laws about restitution for damaged fields, fires, and stolen goods, all within a larger section focused on protecting property and ensuring fairness. This specific rule underscores the borrower's duty to compensate the owner if the borrowed item is harmed or lost, especially when the owner isn't present to oversee its use.
This passage addresses the responsibilities that come with borrowing, differentiating it from merely holding something for safekeeping. It directly follows laws about restitution for damaged fields, fires, and stolen goods, all within a larger section focused on protecting property and ensuring fairness. This specific rule underscores the borrower's duty to compensate the owner if the borrowed item is harmed or lost, especially when the owner isn't present to oversee its use.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Exodus 22:14 is available in the Sola app.
"“If a man borrows anything of his neighbor, and it is injured or dies, the owner not being with it, he shall make full restitution." — What's easy to miss here is the crucial detail about the owner not being present. This isn't just about protecting property; it highlights how the borrower is entrusted with not only the item but t…
