Exodus 22:1
“If a man steals an ox or a sheep, and kills it or sells it, he shall repay five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's easy to miss is the escalation of punishment based on what was stolen and its fate. Stealing an ox, especially if killed or sold, is seen as a more brazen and damaging offense, demanding fivefold restitution, while a sheep, though still serious, requires fourfold, reflecting the ox's greater utility and the increased audacity of stealing it. This isn't just about replacing what was lost, but about deeply deterring actions that disrupt the community's livelihood and honor its property.
This verse kicks off a section of the Law of Moses dealing with civil and criminal justice, outlining consequences for various offenses. Following the laws given at Mount Sinai in Exodus, this passage begins by addressing theft, specifically targeting the theft of valuable livestock like oxen and sheep, which were essential for livelihood and agriculture at the time. It then immediately contrasts this with the justifiable killing of a thief caught in the act during the night.
Ever wonder why stealing an ox costs SO much more than just giving another ox back? It’s not just about the animal itself.
More Than Just the Object
The law here in Exodus 22:1 is striking. When someone steals an animal and then kills or sells it, the punishment isn't just returning what was taken. It's a heavy fine: five oxen for one, and four sheep for one. Why such a steep price?
The Value of Labor and Life
Commentators point out that an ox was incredibly valuable for its labor. It tilled the fields, which was essential for survival and prosperity in ancient Israel. Losing an ox meant losing the ability to farm that season. A sheep, while important, didn't provide the same kind of essential daily labor.
Deterrence and Justice
This multi-fold restitution also served as a strong deterrent. It made the risk of theft extremely high. It also aimed for a sense of justice, acknowledging that the victim lost not just the animal, but also its potential offspring, its milk, its wool, and, crucially, its working capacity.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Exodus 22:1 is available in the Sola app.
Stealing is wrong, but does the way you steal change the consequence? This ancient law suggests yes.
From Theft to Destruction
Exodus 22:1 distinguishes between stealing an animal and then simply holding onto it (which is covered later in verse 4), and stealing it with the intent to kill or sell it. This latter act is a more complete and brazen form of theft.
The Crime Escalates
When the stolen animal is killed or sold, it signifies a deeper resolve and a greater intent to defraud the owner completely. It's no longer just about taking possession; it's about permanently depriving the owner of any possibility of recovery and profiting from the crime. This escalation of intent naturally calls for a more severe penalty.
A Clear Message
By specifying a higher restitution for killing or selling, God sends a clear message: intentional, irreversible damage carries a greater burden of responsibility. It underlines that the crime isn't just the act of taking, but the finalized destruction of the owner's property and livelihood.
Understand the original words
ganav · Hebrew Verb
To take property belonging to another without permission or right; a violation of both the commandment against theft and the social order God established for the protection of property.
shalam · Hebrew Verb
A term used in legal contexts to refer to the act of making amends for a wrong, specifically through paying back or compensating for loss or damage to restore the victim.
This passage directly quotes and applies the principle of Exodus 22:1, showing how Nathan the prophet uses the law of multiple restitution to highlight King David's sin and guilt.
Proverbs 6:30-31While the restitution amount here is sevenfold, this proverb reflects the ancient understanding that theft demands a restitution far exceeding the simple value of the stolen item, emphasizing the severity of the crime.
Luke 19:8This New Testament account of Zacchaeus demonstrates the practical outworking of repentance and restitution, where he resolves to repay double what he had defrauded, echoing the spirit of making things right after wrongdoing.
Matthew 5:23-24Jesus' teaching on reconciliation emphasizes resolving disputes and restoring relationships before offering worship, aligning with the Old Testament's concern for justice and making amends for harm done, including theft.
calvinExodus 22:1-4: "If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep."
- If a thief be found breaking up. This clause is to be taken separately, and is inserted by way of parenthesis; for, after having decreed the punishment, God adds in connection, "he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he should be sold for his theft;" and this exception as to the thief in the night is introduced parenthetically.…
pooleExodus 22:1: "If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep."
Of theft, Exodus 22:1-4 . Of eating another man’s vineyard, Exodus 2:5 Of hurt coming by fire, Exodus 22:6 . Of hurt coming to goods committed to one’s trust, Exodus 22:7-13 . Of hurt befalling things borrowed, Exodus 22:14,15 . Of committing adultery, Exodus 22:16,17 . Of witchcraft, Exodus 22:18 . Of uncleanness with beasts, Exodus 22:19 . Of idolat…
What's easy to miss is the escalation of punishment based on what was stolen and its fate. Stealing an ox, especially if killed or sold, is seen as a more brazen and damaging offense, demanding fivefold restitution, while a sheep, though still serious, requires fourfold, reflecting the ox's greater utility and the increased audacity of stealing it. This isn't just about replacing what was lost, but about deeply deterring actions that disrupt the community's livelihood and honor its property.
This verse kicks off a section of the Law of Moses dealing with civil and criminal justice, outlining consequences for various offenses. Following the laws given at Mount Sinai in Exodus, this passage begins by addressing theft, specifically targeting the theft of valuable livestock like oxen and sheep, which were essential for livelihood and agriculture at the time. It then immediately contrasts this with the justifiable killing of a thief caught in the act during the night.
This verse kicks off a section of the Law of Moses dealing with civil and criminal justice, outlining consequences for various offenses. Following the laws given at Mount Sinai in Exodus, this passage begins by addressing theft, specifically targeting the theft of valuable livestock like oxen and sheep, which were essential for livelihood and agriculture at the time. It then immediately contrasts this with the justifiable killing of a thief caught in the act during the night.
"“If a man steals an ox or a sheep, and kills it or sells it, he shall repay five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep." — What's easy to miss is the escalation of punishment based on what was stolen and its fate. Stealing an ox, especially if killed or sold, is seen as a more brazen and damaging offense, demanding fiv…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
