Deuteronomy 19:12
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This verse reveals a crucial transfer of responsibility: the elders of the manslayer's city, not the city of refuge, are tasked with handing him over. This shows that the safety of the refuge cities wasn't absolute but contingent on the accused truly being innocent of malicious intent.
then the elders of his city shall send and take him from there, and hand him over to the avenger of blood, so that he may die.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This passage continues the discussion of cities of refuge, specifically addressing the case of someone who intentionally murdered another. Unlike accidental killings, this deliberate act necessitates the elders of the manslayer's city to apprehend him from the place of refuge and hand him over to the "avenger of blood" for execution, ensuring justice for the slain and removing guilt from the land. This contrasts sharply with the protection offered to those who committed accidental manslaughter, highlighting the crucial distinction between intent and accident in God's eyes.
When someone fled to a city of refuge, their safety wasn't guaranteed forever. The community elders held a crucial responsibility.
Community Responsibility for Justice
Deuteronomy 19:12 shows that while cities of refuge offered protection, they weren't loopholes for deliberate murderers. The elders of the city where the accused belonged (or sometimes the city of refuge itself, depending on interpretation of context) had the duty to act.
The phrase 'avenger of blood' sounds harsh, but in ancient Israel, it represented a vital, regulated part of their justice system.
Ask a follow-up
Regulating Retribution
The 'avenger of blood' (Hebrew: go'el haddam) was not a vigilante acting on personal whim. This role was deeply embedded in the social and legal structure of ancient Israel.
Understand the original words
go'el haddam · Hebrew Noun phrase
The relative of a murder victim who has the social and legal duty to execute justice upon the killer, serving as a representative of divine retribution.
This passage describes the process of fleeing to a city of refuge and outlines the judgment process, directly building upon the laws introduced in Deuteronomy regarding accidental killing and the avenger of blood.
Numbers 35:10-32This earlier passage lays the foundational laws for cities of refuge and the concept of the 'avenger of blood,' explaining the distinction between unintentional and intentional killing, which is further refined in Deuteronomy.
2 Samuel 14:4-11This narrative shows a woman using a parable to persuade King David to allow her son, who had killed his brother, to return from exile, touching upon the themes of avenging blood and the king's role in mitigating the punishment.
Romans 13:1-7This New Testament passage speaks of governing authorities being established by God to carry out wrath on the wrongdoer, paralleling the concept of sanctioned judgment and the execution of justice, even if the specific 'avenger of blood' is no longer present in the same form.
calvinDeuteronomy 19:1-13: "When the LORD thy God hath cut off the nations, whose land the LORD thy God giveth thee, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their cities, and in their houses;"
As when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbor to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve, and lighteth upon his neighbor, that he die; he shall flee unto one of those cities, and live:
Quicunque abierit cum proximo suo in si…
cambridgeDeuteronomy 19:12: "Then the elders of his city shall send and fetch him thence, and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die."
12 . the elders of his city , etc.] It is not said who are to judge if wilful murder has been committed (for this see Joshua 20:4-9 ), but the elders of the murderer’s town are responsible for his delivery into the hands of the avenger; it is assumed that they are satisfied as to his guilt. The control of the old custom—in which the punishment…
This verse reveals a crucial transfer of responsibility: the elders of the manslayer's city, not the city of refuge, are tasked with handing him over. This shows that the safety of the refuge cities wasn't absolute but contingent on the accused truly being innocent of malicious intent.
This passage continues the discussion of cities of refuge, specifically addressing the case of someone who intentionally murdered another. Unlike accidental killings, this deliberate act necessitates the elders of the manslayer's city to apprehend him from the place of refuge and hand him over to the "avenger of blood" for execution, ensuring justice for the slain and removing guilt from the land. This contrasts sharply with the protection offered to those who committed accidental manslaughter, highlighting the crucial distinction between intent and accident in God's eyes.
This passage continues the discussion of cities of refuge, specifically addressing the case of someone who intentionally murdered another. Unlike accidental killings, this deliberate act necessitates the elders of the manslayer's city to apprehend him from the place of refuge and hand him over to the "avenger of blood" for execution, ensuring justice for the slain and removing guilt from the land. This contrasts sharply with the protection offered to those who committed accidental manslaughter, highlighting the crucial distinction between intent and accident in God's eyes.
"then the elders of his city shall send and take him from there, and hand him over to the avenger of blood, so that he may die." — This verse reveals a crucial transfer of responsibility: the elders of the manslayer's city, not the city of refuge, are tasked with handing him over. This shows that the safety of the refuge cities…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Last reviewed October 2026
