Daniel 2:39-40
Another kingdom inferior to you shall arise after you, and yet a third kingdom of bronze, which shall rule over all the earth. And there shall be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron, because iron breaks to pieces and shatters all things. And like iron that crushes, it shall break and crush all these.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The "inferior" nature of the second kingdom isn't necessarily about weakness or less power compared to Babylon's. Instead, it points to a decline in the quality of leadership and the moral character of its rulers after the initial splendor of Cyrus.
Nebuchadnezzar has just seen a magnificent statue in a dream, representing successive world empires. This verse, and the preceding one about the silver chest and arms, describes the second empire that will follow Babylon, noting it will be inferior to his own. The prophecy then moves on to the third empire, symbolized by bronze, which will also rule globally.
Nebuchadnezzar's mighty empire will fall. But what replaces it, and what does that mean for us today?
Daniel 2:39 speaks of future kingdoms rising and falling, each represented by a different metal in Nebuchadnezzar's dream. The verse highlights that the second kingdom, symbolized by silver, is 'inferior' to Babylon's gold. This doesn't necessarily mean less powerful in every way, but perhaps less glorious, less stable, or even morally degenerate compared to the golden age of Nebuchadnezzar's reign.
Acknowledging Divine Sovereignty
Even as empires crumble and new ones emerge, the underlying message is God's ultimate control. He 'arises' these kingdoms and determines their succession. This isn't a chaotic free-for-all; it's a divine orchestration of history. The 'inferiority' of the next kingdom underscores that human power, however great, is temporary and subordinate to God's plan.
The 'Brass' Kingdom's Reign
The third kingdom, made of brass, is also mentioned as ruling 'over all the earth.' This mirrors the expansive reach of the Medo-Persian and then the Grecian empires. It's a reminder that God sees the grand sweep of history, from one dominant power to the next, all unfolding according to His predetermined purpose.
Why does God use metals like gold, silver, and brass to describe empires? What hidden truths lie within this symbolic language?
The metals used to describe the successive kingdoms in Daniel's vision (gold, silver, brass) are not arbitrary. They represent a progressive decline in intrinsic value and glory as the image descends from the head to the legs and feet.
Gold: The Pinnacle of Glory
Nebuchadnezzar's empire, symbolized by gold, represents the height of earthly power and splendor in this sequence. It's the ideal, the peak from which the subsequent kingdoms descend.
Silver: A Step Down
The second kingdom, represented by silver, is explicitly called 'inferior.' This inferiority can be understood in various ways: perhaps in the purity of rule, the stability of succession, or the ultimate glory compared to the initial golden empire. The commentary notes suggest reasons like internal divisions (two arms/breasts) or moral decline, even while the empire might expand in territory.
Understand the original words
nechash · Aramaic Noun
A metal symbolizing durability and strength, often used in biblical prophecy to denote kingdoms characterized by military might and harsh subjugation.
parzel · Aramaic Noun
A metal symbolizing unrelenting power and the capacity to crush or destroy, often representing kingdoms that exert total control through force.
c. 605 BC— this verse
Nebuchadnezzar Establishes Babylonian Empire
Nebuchadnezzar consolidates power, marking the beginning of the Babylonian Empire, which would dominate the region.
c. 539 BC
Medo-Persian Empire Conquers Babylon
Cyrus the Great, leading the combined Medo-Persian forces, overthrows the Babylonian Empire, establishing a new world power.
c. 538 BC
Decree Allowing Jewish Return
Cyrus issues a decree permitting exiled Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their Temple, a significant event in their history.
334-330 BC
Alexander the Great Conquers Persian Empire
Alexander the Great's rapid conquests dismantle the vast Medo-Persian Empire, ushering in the era of Hellenistic influence.
c. 323 BC
Alexander's Empire Divided
Following Alexander's death, his vast empire is divided among his generals, leading to a period of conflict and shifting powers.
This passage describes a second beast like a bear, which is also associated with a kingdom that follows the first (lion-like kingdom), echoing the sequence of empires in Daniel 2.
Daniel 8:5The vision of the ram and the goat directly parallels the metallic kingdoms of Daniel 2, with the ram representing the Medo-Persian empire and the goat representing the Grecian empire that follows.
Daniel 11:2This verse speaks of kings of Persia who will arise, directly referencing the Medo-Persian empire that succeeded Babylon and preceded the Grecian empire.
This passage describes Alexander the Great overthrowing the Persian empire and conquering vast territories, aligning with the 'third kingdom of brass' ruling over 'all the earth'.
bensonDaniel 2:39: "And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth."
Daniel 2:39 . After thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee — “It is very well known, that the kingdom which arose after the Babylonian was the Medo-Persian. The two hands and the shoulders signify that the empire of the Babylonians should be destroyed by two kings. The two kings were the kings of the Medes and Persians, whose powers…
barnesDaniel 2:39: "And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth."
And after thee - This must mean "subsequently" to the reign, but it does not mean that the kingdom here referred to would "immediately" succeed his own reign, for that would not be true. The Medo-Persian empire did not come into the ascendency until many years after the death of Nebuchadnezzar. This occurred during the reign of Belshazzar, a g…
The "inferior" nature of the second kingdom isn't necessarily about weakness or less power compared to Babylon's. Instead, it points to a decline in the quality of leadership and the moral character of its rulers after the initial splendor of Cyrus.
Nebuchadnezzar has just seen a magnificent statue in a dream, representing successive world empires. This verse, and the preceding one about the silver chest and arms, describes the second empire that will follow Babylon, noting it will be inferior to his own. The prophecy then moves on to the third empire, symbolized by bronze, which will also rule globally.
Nebuchadnezzar has just seen a magnificent statue in a dream, representing successive world empires. This verse, and the preceding one about the silver chest and arms, describes the second empire that will follow Babylon, noting it will be inferior to his own. The prophecy then moves on to the third empire, symbolized by bronze, which will also rule globally.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Daniel 2:39-40 is available in the Sola app.
Brass: Strength and Durability, But Less Precious
Brass, a stronger and more durable metal than silver, signifies a powerful kingdom, yet it's less precious. The Grecian empire, symbolized by brass, was known for its military might and vast conquests. However, its intrinsic value and perhaps its moral standing were considered lower than the preceding empires in God's prophetic timeline.
"Another kingdom inferior to you shall arise after you, and yet a third kingdom of bronze, which shall rule over all the earth. And there shall be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron, because iron breaks to pieces and shatters all things. And…" — The "inferior" nature of the second kingdom isn't necessarily about weakness or less power compared to Babylon's. Instead, it points to a decline in the quality of leadership and the moral character…
