Daniel 11:30
For ships of Kittim shall come against him, and he shall be afraid and withdraw, and shall turn back and be enraged and take action against the holy covenant. He shall turn back and pay attention to those who forsake the holy covenant.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The passage highlights a crucial shift in the king's focus: his original ambition is thwarted by a foreign power, leading him not to abandon his conquest, but to redirect his rage. He turns from his grand strategic goal in Egypt to lash out at the "holy covenant" and actively seeks out those within the covenant who had already abandoned it.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes is invading Egypt, but his campaign is dramatically halted by a Roman delegation demanding his withdrawal. Humiliated and enraged by this foreign intervention, he turns his fury back towards the holy land. He doesn't act alone, but conspires with factions within his own empire who have abandoned their ancestral faith and traditions.
Imagine a king on the verge of a grand conquest, only to be halted by a simple, yet absolute, demand from a foreign power. This is the moment Antiochus IV Epiphanes faces.
The phrase 'ships of Kittim' in this verse refers to the Roman Empire. Historically, Roman ambassadors arrived to confront Antiochus as he was poised to conquer Egypt. The lead ambassador, Popilius Laenas, famously drew a circle in the sand around Antiochus and demanded an immediate answer: cease the conquest or face war with Rome.
This encounter was a seismic shift. Antiochus, who had been a powerful ruler, was forced to 'lose heart' (grieved) and abandon his campaign. This wasn't just a setback; it was a public humiliation by a rising superpower, demonstrating the dramatic shift in geopolitical power from the Hellenistic kingdoms to Rome.
Defeated and publicly embarrassed, a powerful ruler doesn't always retreat quietly. Sometimes, their rage is redirected towards those they perceive as weaker.
The immediate aftermath of Antiochus's humiliating encounter with the Romans is not a return home in peace, but a surge of 'indignation against the holy covenant.' His failed ambition in Egypt turns into a vengeful fury directed at Jerusalem and the Jewish people.
This redirection of anger is a dangerous pattern. Instead of processing his defeat, Antiochus lashes out. He actively seeks out and aligns himself with 'those who forsake the holy covenant' – Jewish individuals who had embraced Hellenistic culture and rejected their religious heritage. These apostates become his tools and informants, fueling his rage and providing a pretext for his brutal actions against the faithful Jews and their sacred covenant.
Understand the original words
Kittiyim · Hebrew Noun
A term referring to the coastal lands of the Mediterranean, specifically Cyprus or the lands further west. In prophecy, it often signifies foreign, distant powers coming to execute divine judgment.
azab · Hebrew Verb
To abandon or turn away from a commitment, specifically a covenant with God. It indicates a willful apostasy or desertion of the truth and divine authority.
This passage vividly illustrates how geopolitical humiliation can fuel religious persecution. Antiochus's forced retreat from Egypt, a direct result of Roman power, ignited his rage, which he then unleashed upon the Jewish people and their sacred covenant.
168 BC— this verse
Roman Ultimatum in Egypt
Roman ambassadors, led by Gaius Popilius Laenas, encountered Antiochus IV Epiphanes near Alexandria and delivered an ultimatum demanding his withdrawal from Egypt. Antiochus, intimidated by Rome's power, was forced to abandon his campaign.
167 BC
Antiochus's Vengeance on Jerusalem
Enraged by his humiliation in Egypt, Antiochus vented his fury on Jerusalem. His general, Apollonius, attacked the city, killed many Jews, and desecrated the Temple.
167 BC
The Rise of Hellenizers
Jewish individuals who had adopted Greek customs and forsaken their religious heritage collaborated with Antiochus. They encouraged his persecution of faithful Jews and the imposition of Hellenistic practices.
167-164 BC
Systematic Persecution of Judaism
Antiochus IV Epiphanes enforced Hellenistic religion, forbidding Jewish worship and imposing pagan practices, including the dedication of the Jerusalem Temple to Zeus. This period marked a severe crisis for Jewish faith and identity.
This passage directly describes the 'forsakers of the holy covenant' that Daniel mentions, detailing how some Israelites adopted Greek customs and renounced their heritage.
This section shows Antiochus's interaction with apostate Jews, particularly Menelaus, illustrating the 'intelligence' mentioned in Daniel 11:30 and how internal betrayal fueled external persecution.
This passage details the direct consequences of Antiochus's rage against the 'holy covenant,' including the desecration of the temple and the forced Hellenization of Jewish practices, reflecting the 'indignation' described in Daniel.
ellicottDaniel 11:30: "For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant."
(30) Ships of Chittim.— On Chittim, see Genesis 10:4 ; comp. Numbers 24:24 . The LXX. explain this of the Romans, referring to the story in Livy, xlv. 11. He shall be grieved.—Literally, he shall lose heart. Compare the words of Livy, which…
barnesDaniel 11:30: "For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant."
For the ships of Chittim shall come against him - The word rendered Chittim - כתים kı̂ttı̂ym - according to Gesenius, properly means "Cyprians," so called from a celebrated Phoenician colony in the island of Cyprus. In a wider acceptation t…
The passage highlights a crucial shift in the king's focus: his original ambition is thwarted by a foreign power, leading him not to abandon his conquest, but to redirect his rage. He turns from his grand strategic goal in Egypt to lash out at the "holy covenant" and actively seeks out those within the covenant who had already abandoned it.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes is invading Egypt, but his campaign is dramatically halted by a Roman delegation demanding his withdrawal. Humiliated and enraged by this foreign intervention, he turns his fury back towards the holy land. He doesn't act alone, but conspires with factions within his own empire who have abandoned their ancestral faith and traditions.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes is invading Egypt, but his campaign is dramatically halted by a Roman delegation demanding his withdrawal. Humiliated and enraged by this foreign intervention, he turns his fury back towards the holy land. He doesn't act alone, but conspires with factions within his own empire who have abandoned their ancestral faith and traditions.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Daniel 11:30 is available in the Sola app.
"For ships of Kittim shall come against him, and he shall be afraid and withdraw, and shall turn back and be enraged and take action against the holy covenant. He shall turn back and pay attention to those who forsake the holy covenant." — The passage highlights a crucial shift in the king's focus: his original ambition is thwarted by a foreign power, leading him not to abandon his conquest, but to redirect his rage. He turns from his…
