Stephen describes a dramatic shift in Egypt. A new king arrives, and suddenly, the favor shown to Israel disappears. What does it mean for a ruler to 'not know' someone so significant?

The phrase "who did not know Joseph" is more than just a lack of personal acquaintance. It signifies a fundamental change in policy and attitude towards Joseph's people, the Israelites.

A Shift in Governance

• Forgetting Benefits: This new Pharaoh didn't acknowledge Joseph's immense contributions to Egypt – saving the nation from famine and establishing its prosperity. He disregarded the past service and the foundational relationship Joseph had built.
• New Dynasty, New Rules: Often, a change in ruling family or dynasty meant a complete overhaul of previous policies. This king, possibly from a different lineage, didn't feel bound by the agreements or the goodwill established by his predecessor's advisors.
• Deliberate Ignorance: It could also imply a willful disregard. While he might have known of Joseph, he chose not to recognize his merits or extend the same patronage to Joseph's family. It was a political decision to sever ties with the past.

Joseph was a hero to Egypt, a savior during a devastating famine. How could a nation, and its new leader, so quickly forget such a debt?

This transition in Egypt serves as a stark reminder of human nature and the fragility of gratitude, especially in positions of power.

The Fading Memory of Favor

• National Ingratitude: History shows that nations and rulers can be remarkably ungrateful. Benefits conferred by past leaders or allies are often forgotten when a new regime comes to power, especially if they see the previous beneficiaries as a threat or an inconvenience.