Acts 4:16-17
saying, “What shall we do with these men? For that a notable sign has been performed through them is evident to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it. But in order that it may spread no further among the people, let us warn them to speak no more to anyone in this name.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The religious leaders wrestle not with if a miracle happened, but what policy to adopt, revealing their concern for public opinion and political expediency over truth. Their question, "What shall we do?" shows they've abandoned their role as judges weighing evidence and instead are planning how to manage a situation they can't deny but also refuse to accept.
The religious leaders, after trying to silence Peter and John, are now confronted with the undeniable reality that a man crippled from birth was healed right before their eyes. They acknowledge this powerful sign is known to everyone in Jerusalem, leaving them baffled and unsure how to proceed, fearing further public outcry if they punish the apostles.
The religious leaders were cornered. A powerful event had happened, and everyone knew it. What do you do when undeniable proof stares you down?
The council faced a stark reality in Acts 4:16. Peter and John had healed a man who had been lame for decades – a miracle witnessed by countless people in Jerusalem. The leaders themselves confessed, 'a notable sign has been performed through them... and we cannot deny it.'
This wasn't just any event; it was a 'sign,' pointing to God's direct involvement. Their immediate problem wasn't if it happened, but what to do about it. The miracle was so public and so profound that denying it was impossible. This put them in a difficult spot: how do you shut down something that so clearly demonstrates divine power?
The leaders weren't interested in truth; they were interested in their own power. When evidence is ignored, what agenda is really at play?
The question the leaders asked – 'What shall we do to these men?' – wasn't a question of justice, but of political expediency. They weren't concerned with what was right, but what was practical for maintaining their authority.
As one commentator noted, they abandoned their role as a court of justice to discuss 'what policy was most expedient.' They knew the miracle was real and that Peter and John acted with divine authority. Their fear wasn't that the apostles were wrong, but that the truth would spread and undermine their control. This is why their next step was not to investigate further, but to silence the witnesses.
Understand the original words
sēmeion · Greek Noun
A miraculous act or event intended to point toward a greater spiritual reality, validate a message, or reveal the power and presence of God. It functions as a 'sign' that authenticates the authority of the message being delivered.
onoma · Greek Noun
The formal title, reputation, authority, and character of a person. In the New Testament, invoking the 'name' of Jesus signifies acting under His delegated authority and bearing witness to His identity as the Messiah.
laleō · Greek Verb
To proclaim, declare, or communicate the message of the Gospel. It implies a public and authoritative declaration of the truth of God, often in the face of opposition.
This passage highlights a crucial moment where political expediency clashes with undeniable divine intervention. The Jewish leaders, faced with irrefutable proof of God's power, choose suppression over truth due to fear of public reaction.
c. AD 30— this verse
Healing of the Lame Man
Peter and John heal a man lame from birth at the temple gate. This event is witnessed by many and becomes a major public spectacle in Jerusalem.
c. AD 30
Arrest and Trial of Apostles
Peter and John are arrested by temple authorities and brought before the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council, for preaching in Jesus' name.
c. AD 30
Sanhedrin's Dilemma
The Sanhedrin, including high priests and elders, acknowledges the undeniable miracle but fears the growing popularity of the apostles and the movement.
c. AD 30
Threat and Release
The council, unable to deny the miracle, decides to threaten Peter and John to prevent them from speaking or teaching about Jesus. They are then released.
This passage shows the religious leaders grappling with the undeniable signs Jesus performed, mirroring the council's dilemma in Acts 4 about how to handle the apostles' miraculous healing.
Acts 5:13This verse describes the fear and reverence the crowds had for Peter and John due to their signs, highlighting the public awareness and impact of the miracles that the council couldn't deny.
2 Corinthians 12:12Paul uses signs, wonders, and miracles as evidence of his apostleship, echoing how the leaders in Acts 4 recognized the 'notable sign' as proof of divine power behind Peter and John's actions.
Psalm 118:22The 'stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone' resonates with how the leaders, who should have recognized divine work, rejected Peter and John, yet the miracle served as undeniable proof of God's power.
meyerActs 4:16: "Saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it."
Acts 4:16 . The positive thought of the question is: We shall be able to do nothing to these men . What follows contains the reason: for that a notable miracle (a definite proof of divine co-operation) has happened through them, is evident to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and we are not in a position to deny it .…
jfbActs 4:16: "Saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it."
- a notable miracle … done by them is manifest to all … in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it—And why should ye wish to deny it, O ye rulers, but that ye hate the light, and will not come to the light lest your deeds should be reproved?
The religious leaders wrestle not with if a miracle happened, but what policy to adopt, revealing their concern for public opinion and political expediency over truth. Their question, "What shall we do?" shows they've abandoned their role as judges weighing evidence and instead are planning how to manage a situation they can't deny but also refuse to accept.
The religious leaders, after trying to silence Peter and John, are now confronted with the undeniable reality that a man crippled from birth was healed right before their eyes. They acknowledge this powerful sign is known to everyone in Jerusalem, leaving them baffled and unsure how to proceed, fearing further public outcry if they punish the apostles.
The religious leaders, after trying to silence Peter and John, are now confronted with the undeniable reality that a man crippled from birth was healed right before their eyes. They acknowledge this powerful sign is known to everyone in Jerusalem, leaving them baffled and unsure how to proceed, fearing further public outcry if they punish the apostles.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about Acts 4:16-17 is available in the Sola app.
"saying, “What shall we do with these men? For that a notable sign has been performed through them is evident to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it. But in order that it may spread no further among the people, let us wa…" — The religious leaders wrestle not with if a miracle happened, but what policy to adopt, revealing their concern for public opinion and political expediency over truth. Their question, "What shall w…
