2 Samuel 20:1
Now there happened to be there a worthless man, whose name was Sheba, the son of Bichri, a Benjaminite. And he blew the trumpet and said, “We have no portion in David, and we have no inheritance in the son of Jesse; every man to his tents, O Israel!”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
The verse subtly points out that Sheba's rebellion isn't about a real grievance with David; he's just a "worthless man" whose name, connected to the idea of a "horn" or "trumpet," suggests he's all about making noise and stirring up trouble. His rallying cry, "every man to his tents," is a coded rejection of the entire covenant community and God's chosen king, David, rather than a genuine complaint. It's a stark reminder that sometimes, division is sown by those who are simply seeking their own platform.
This verse kicks off a rebellion against King David. Just as things seemed to be settling down after Absalom's failed coup, a man named Sheba stirs up discontent among the northern tribes. He calls them away from David, exploiting lingering resentments and challenging David's legitimacy, leading to a brief but serious division in the kingdom.
A single voice can ignite a wildfire of dissent. This passage introduces us to a man whose name becomes synonymous with rebellion, highlighting how easily discontent can spread.
The text immediately labels Sheba as a 'worthless man' (Hebrew: beliya'al). This isn't just a mild insult; it signifies someone who is morally bankrupt, destructive, and an agent of chaos.
His words are a direct challenge to David's reign, specifically targeting the unity of Israel. He severs the connection to David, the 'son of Jesse,' and by extension, to God's chosen king. His call to 'every man to his tents' is a rallying cry for secession, aiming to pull the tribes away from the unified kingdom David had worked so hard to establish.
Sheba's cry isn't just political; it's deeply personal and theological. What does it mean to have 'no portion' in your king, and why does it matter so much?
Sheba’s statement, 'We have no portion in David, and we have no inheritance in the son of Jesse,' is a radical rejection of the Davidic covenant.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about 2 Samuel 20:1 is available in the Sola app.
David was more than just a ruler; he was God's anointed king, chosen to lead Israel and establish a lasting dynasty. To declare 'no portion' in David was to declare no portion in God's plan for Israel's unity and security under a divinely appointed king.
This rebellion taps into underlying tribal loyalties and potential resentments that the unified kingdom had suppressed. Sheba exploits these feelings, offering an alternative to David's rule – a return to tribal independence, symbolized by returning 'to his tents.'
Understand the original words
beliyya'al · Hebrew Noun
A term often used in wisdom literature and historical narratives to describe a person who lacks moral character, is wicked, or acts as a troublemaker against the established order or God. It implies one who is "good for nothing" or lacks worth before God.
shophar · Hebrew Noun
A metal instrument used in ancient Israel for signaling, announcing royal decrees, declaring war, or calling the people to assembly. It carries significant theological weight in calling God's people to attention or impending judgment.
cheleq · Hebrew Noun
In a biblical context, this refers to one's allotted share in the covenant promises, land, or kingdom blessings. To say one has 'no portion' is a formal rejection of covenantal loyalty or inheritance within the community of God's people.
nachalah · Hebrew Noun
Refers to the legal right or possession passed down through lineage, specifically the promised land of Israel. It represents the permanent status and standing a person has within God's covenant family.
This revolt, led by a man from the same tribe as King Saul (Benjamin), highlights how quickly discontent could resurface after the trauma of Absalom's rebellion, threatening the fragile unity David had worked so hard to build.
c. 1010 BC
David Anointed King
David is anointed king over Judah in Hebron, following the death of King Saul. This marks the beginning of his long reign but also initial division.
c. 1003 BC
David Becomes King Over All Israel
After seven years ruling only Judah, David is finally accepted as king over the united tribes of Israel, establishing his capital in Jerusalem.
c. 1001 BC
David's Census and Divine Judgment
David orders a census of Israel, which displeases God. A plague is sent as punishment, highlighting the precariousness of his rule and the people's spiritual state.
c. 1000 BC
Absalom's Rebellion
David's own son, Absalom, leads a massive rebellion, driving David out of Jerusalem and nearly seizing the throne. This deeply fractured the kingdom.
c. 1000 BC— this verse
Absalom's Defeat and Death
Absalom's rebellion is crushed by David's forces, but his death is a profound personal tragedy for David and a moment of intense national trauma.
c. 999 BC
Sheba's Revolt Begins
Shortly after the suppression of Absalom's rebellion, Sheba, a Benjaminite, exploits lingering discontent by inciting a new revolt against David's rule.
c. 999 BC
Sheba's Revolt Quelled
Joab, David's commander, quickly pursues and defeats Sheba's forces, preventing the kingdom from splitting apart again so soon after Absalom's rebellion.
This passage echoes Sheba's call for rebellion, showing how the Israelites declared 'No share have we in David' and went to their own homes, establishing a pattern of division.
Judges 20:3The tribes of Israel gather and ask, 'Shall we indeed go up and begin the attack on the Benjaminites?' This highlights the serious tribal divisions and conflicts that plagued Israel, a context Sheba's rebellion exploits.
Galatians 5:19-20Sheba's actions demonstrate the 'works of the flesh' like disunity and factiousness, which Paul warns against, showing how quickly internal strife can tear apart a community.
1 Corinthians 1:10Paul implores the Corinthian church to 'be perfectly united in the same mind and the same judgment,' a stark contrast to the divisive spirit Sheba ignited by sowing discord among the tribes.
The verse subtly points out that Sheba's rebellion isn't about a real grievance with David; he's just a "worthless man" whose name, connected to the idea of a "horn" or "trumpet," suggests he's all about making noise and stirring up trouble. His rallying cry, "every man to his tents," is a coded rejection of the entire covenant community and God's chosen king, David, rather than a genuine complaint. It's a stark reminder that sometimes, division is sown by those who are simply seeking their own platform.
This verse kicks off a rebellion against King David. Just as things seemed to be settling down after Absalom's failed coup, a man named Sheba stirs up discontent among the northern tribes. He calls them away from David, exploiting lingering resentments and challenging David's legitimacy, leading to a brief but serious division in the kingdom.
This verse kicks off a rebellion against King David. Just as things seemed to be settling down after Absalom's failed coup, a man named Sheba stirs up discontent among the northern tribes. He calls them away from David, exploiting lingering resentments and challenging David's legitimacy, leading to a brief but serious division in the kingdom.
"Now there happened to be there a worthless man, whose name was Sheba, the son of Bichri, a Benjaminite. And he blew the trumpet and said,
“We have no portion in David,
and we have no inheritance in the son of Jesse;
every man…" — The verse subtly points out that Sheba's rebellion isn't about a real grievance with David; he's just a "worthless man" whose name, connected to the idea of a "horn" or "trumpet," suggests he's all a…
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.