2 Samuel 16:21
Ahithophel said to Absalom, “Go in to your father’s concubines, whom he has left to keep the house, and all Israel will hear that you have made yourself a stench to your father, and the hands of all who are with you will be strengthened.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's easy to miss here is that Ahithophel's counsel isn't just about asserting dominance; it's a strategic move to irreversibly sever Absalom from David. By publicly defiling David's concubines, Absalom would commit an act so heinous that reconciliation would be impossible, thus uniting everyone against David and strengthening support for Absalom's rebellion.
Absalom has just fled Jerusalem after rebelling against his father, King David, and Ahithophel, a trusted advisor, has joined him. Ahithophel now proposes a shocking and deeply symbolic act: for Absalom to publicly claim his father's concubines. This act is meant to signify a complete severance of ties with David and solidify Absalom's claim to the throne in the eyes of all Israel, making any reconciliation impossible.
Ahithophel's advice to Absalom is chillingly specific and deeply wicked. What was he really trying to achieve with this horrific suggestion?
Ahithophel wasn't just advising Absalom on how to seize power; he was advising him on how to commit the ultimate act of rebellion and defilement. By taking David's concubines, Absalom would be symbolically claiming David's kingship in the most scandalous way possible. This act was not only a public declaration of war but also a profound dishonor to David, making reconciliation impossible. Ahithophel's goal was to cut off any possibility of Absalom turning back, ensuring a complete and bloody break from David's reign. It was a strategy designed to harden hearts and ensure the civil war would be total and irreversible.
The word 'stench' is powerful and unsettling. What does it truly signify in the context of Absalom's rebellion and Ahithophel's strategy?
Ahithophel uses the word 'stench' to describe the public perception of Absalom's actions. This wasn't just about a personal falling out; it was about creating a public scandal that would alienate David completely. The act would make Absalom 'a stench to your father' and, by extension, to all of Israel who respected David. It was a way to ensure that David would be utterly shamed and repudiated. This 'stench' was meant to be an irreversible mark of disgrace, signaling that Absalom had crossed a line from which there could be no return. It was designed to rally support for Absalom by painting David as weak and abandoned, and Absalom as the decisive new leader, regardless of the moral cost.
Ahithophel claimed his terrible advice would 'strengthen' Absalom's cause. How does such a wicked act lead to strength?
Ahithophel's logic was that extreme actions create extreme loyalty and resolve. By committing such a scandalous act, Absalom would:
Understand the original words
pilegesh · Hebrew Noun
A king's secondary wife of lower status, whose children generally did not inherit the throne but who was nonetheless considered the king's property and exclusive sexual partner. In a political context, taking the king's concubines was a symbolic act of seizing the throne.
ba'ash · Hebrew Verb
A metaphorical expression signifying to be odious, detestable, or repulsive, particularly through an act of public betrayal or shame that creates an irreversible breach in a relationship.
yad · Hebrew Noun
A term denoting moral or physical might, authority, or the capacity to act. In a military context, 'strengthening hands' refers to encouraging or emboldening someone to pursue a course of action with vigor.
Ahithophel's brutal advice to Absalom is a calculated, Machiavellian move designed to irrevocably sever any chance of reconciliation between Absalom and David, leveraging deeply symbolic and scandalous actions to solidify Absalom's power and alienate any potential loyalists to David.
c. 1010 BC
David becomes King of Israel
David unites the tribes of Israel and establishes Jerusalem as his capital, ushering in a golden age for the nation.
c. 1005 BC
David's Affair with Bathsheba
David commits adultery with Bathsheba and arranges for her husband Uriah's death, a sin that has severe consequences for his family.
c. 1000-990 BC
Amnon Rapes Tamar
David's son Amnon rapes his half-sister Tamar, and David fails to punish Amnon, sowing seeds of resentment.
c. 990 BC
Absalom Kills Amnon
In revenge for Tamar's rape, Absalom has Amnon murdered, forcing Absalom into exile for several years.
c. 986 BC
This passage shows Adonijah making a similar power grab by lusting after Abishag, David's concubine, demonstrating the political significance of such actions as a claim to the throne.
Deuteronomy 22:30The Mosaic Law explicitly prohibited taking a father's concubine, marking such an act as a severe violation that would bring disgrace and division, echoing the 'stench' mentioned in 2 Samuel.
2 Samuel 3:7David himself committed a similar act of public transgression by taking Saul's concubines, which created scandal and was seen as a move to assert his claim and alienate himself from Saul's legacy.
Jeremiah 3:1-2The prophet uses the metaphor of a wife who has lain with others to describe Israel's spiritual adultery with foreign gods, illustrating how sexual transgression can symbolize profound betrayal and public shame.
What's easy to miss here is that Ahithophel's counsel isn't just about asserting dominance; it's a strategic move to irreversibly sever Absalom from David. By publicly defiling David's concubines, Absalom would commit an act so heinous that reconciliation would be impossible, thus uniting everyone against David and strengthening support for Absalom's rebellion.
Absalom has just fled Jerusalem after rebelling against his father, King David, and Ahithophel, a trusted advisor, has joined him. Ahithophel now proposes a shocking and deeply symbolic act: for Absalom to publicly claim his father's concubines. This act is meant to signify a complete severance of ties with David and solidify Absalom's claim to the throne in the eyes of all Israel, making any reconciliation impossible.
Absalom has just fled Jerusalem after rebelling against his father, King David, and Ahithophel, a trusted advisor, has joined him. Ahithophel now proposes a shocking and deeply symbolic act: for Absalom to publicly claim his father's concubines. This act is meant to signify a complete severance of ties with David and solidify Absalom's claim to the throne in the eyes of all Israel, making any reconciliation impossible.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about 2 Samuel 16:21 is available in the Sola app.
In essence, Ahithophel believed that the shock and horror of the act would galvanize Absalom's supporters and demoralize David's, thereby 'strengthening' the rebellion's position.
Absalom's Return and Rebellion
Absalom returns to Jerusalem but is initially barred from seeing David. He slowly gains popular support and eventually launches a full-scale rebellion against his father.
c. 985 BC
David Flees Jerusalem
David is forced to abandon Jerusalem as Absalom's forces approach, a deep humiliation and turning point in the civil war.
c. 985 BC
Absalom's Forces Defeated
Absalom's rebellion is crushed, and he is killed, leading to a period of mourning for David and the restoration of his kingship.
"Ahithophel said to Absalom, “Go in to your father’s concubines, whom he has left to keep the house, and all Israel will hear that you have made yourself a stench to your father, and the hands of all who are with you will be strengthened.”" — What's easy to miss here is that Ahithophel's counsel isn't just about asserting dominance; it's a strategic move to irreversibly sever Absalom from David. By publicly defiling David's concubines,…
