2 Kings 6:29
So we boiled my son and ate him. And on the next day I said to her, ‘Give your son, that we may eat him.’ But she has hidden her son.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
2 Kings 6:29
So we boiled my son and ate him. And on the next day I said to her, ‘Give your son, that we may eat him.’ But she has hidden her son.”
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
What's truly chilling here isn't just the cannibalism, but the mother's chillingly calm recounting of it as a past event, followed by her immediate demand for her son, as if the horror of the first day should have been lesson enough. The normalcy with which she states the unthinkable exposes the complete breakdown of humanity in Samaria under siege, where even parental bonds are twisted into something monstrous by extreme hunger.
The city of Samaria is under a brutal siege, starving its people to the point of desperation. Just before this, two women had made a horrifying pact: to eat their sons, with the first one's son being consumed that day. This verse reveals the second woman's chilling response, as she clutches her hidden child to protect him from the same fate.
Imagine a city under siege, starving. What happens when basic survival trumps everything, even the natural bond between a mother and child?
This verse paints a chilling picture of the extreme suffering caused by the prolonged siege of Samaria by the Arameans, as described earlier in 2 Kings 6. The desperation was so profound that unthinkable acts, like cannibalism, became a reality.
A Mother's Tragic Choice
The text reveals a horrific pact between two women: 'We boiled my son and ate him.' This wasn't a spontaneous act, but a desperate agreement born of utter starvation. The second woman then expected her son to be next, but the first mother, despite her previous act, had hidden her son.
This scene highlights the utter breakdown of society and natural affections under extreme duress. It's a stark warning about the devastating consequences of rebellion and judgment.
In the midst of this unimaginable horror, where is God? And how does His Word speak into such profound darkness?
While 2 Kings 6:29 shows the terrible reality on the ground, it's crucial to remember the surrounding context. Elisha had prophesied that the siege would end dramatically, with food becoming abundant and cheap within days (2 Kings 7:1, 16).
A Glimpse of Hope
This verse, shocking as it is, serves to amplify the completeness of the judgment and the miraculousness of the deliverance that was soon to follow. God allowed this horrific scene to be recorded not to glorify suffering, but to underscore His faithfulness in fulfilling both His judgments and His promises.
The very next chapter (2 Kings 7) details how the Arameans fled, leaving their abundant provisions behind, proving Elisha's prophecy true and bringing swift relief to Samaria.
The extreme famine described in this passage was a direct result of prolonged military campaigns and sieges by the Arameans, highlighting the devastating human cost of ancient warfare and the breakdown of societal order under extreme duress.
853 BC
Battle of Qarqar
An Assyrian victory that weakened regional powers, potentially contributing to instability in Israel and surrounding kingdoms.
c. 841 BC
Reign of Jehu Begins in Israel
Jehu's bloody purge of the Omri dynasty and Baal worship brought internal upheaval, potentially weakening defenses.
c. 841-797 BC
Hazael's Aramean Campaigns
Hazael, King of Aram-Damascus, waged successful wars against Israel and Judah, conquering territory and imposing tribute.
c. 800 BC— this verse
Aramean Siege of Samaria
During the reign of King Jehoash of Israel, Hazael of Aram-Damascus besieged Samaria, inflicting severe hardship and famine.
c. 796 BC
This passage in Leviticus, part of the covenant curses for disobedience, directly predicts the horrific act described in 2 Kings, showing it as a consequence of turning away from God.
Jeremiah 19:9Jeremiah echoes this same dire prophecy, emphasizing the desperation and judgment that would come upon Judah, including the unthinkable act of parents eating their children in a siege.
Lamentations 4:10The prophet Jeremiah, writing after Jerusalem's fall, vividly describes the same extreme starvation and cannibalism, confirming that this terrible event was not an isolated incident but a brutal reality of God's judgment.
Deuteronomy 28:53-57This passage from Deuteronomy lists the severe curses for breaking the covenant, including the prophecy that desperation during a siege would drive people to eat the flesh of their own children, directly foreshadowing the events in 2 Kings.
What's truly chilling here isn't just the cannibalism, but the mother's chillingly calm recounting of it as a past event, followed by her immediate demand for her son, as if the horror of the first day should have been lesson enough. The normalcy with which she states the unthinkable exposes the complete breakdown of humanity in Samaria under siege, where even parental bonds are twisted into something monstrous by extreme hunger.
The city of Samaria is under a brutal siege, starving its people to the point of desperation. Just before this, two women had made a horrifying pact: to eat their sons, with the first one's son being consumed that day. This verse reveals the second woman's chilling response, as she clutches her hidden child to protect him from the same fate.
The city of Samaria is under a brutal siege, starving its people to the point of desperation. Just before this, two women had made a horrifying pact: to eat their sons, with the first one's son being consumed that day. This verse reveals the second woman's chilling response, as she clutches her hidden child to protect him from the same fate.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about 2 Kings 6:29 is available in the Sola app.
Death of Hazael
The death of Hazael brought some relief to Israel from Aramean oppression, though the damage had been severe.
"So we boiled my son and ate him. And on the next day I said to her, ‘Give your son, that we may eat him.’ But she has hidden her son.”" — What's truly chilling here isn't just the cannibalism, but the mother's chillingly calm recounting of it as a past event, followed by her immediate demand for her son, as if the horror of the first…