1 Kings 15:34
He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD and walked in the way of Jeroboam and in his sin which he made Israel to sin.
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
This verse doesn't just say Baasha did evil; it highlights he copied Jeroboam's specific brand of rebellion. The text emphasizes that his sin wasn't just personal, but a deliberate perpetuation of the very actions that had already led Israel astray. It's a stark reminder that following a bad example can compound the spiritual damage.
This verse describes the reign of Baasha, the king of Israel. Following the turbulent succession after Jeroboam's death, Baasha continues the same pattern of idolatry and rebellion against God that marked Jeroboam's rule. His entire reign is characterized by this deliberate imitation of sin, leading the people astray and facing God's judgment.
Some leaders leave behind great monuments, others, a lasting stain. This verse shows us the latter, a leader defined by the sins of the one who came before him.
Following the Wrong Path
King Baasha's reign is summarized in a single, damning sentence: he did evil and walked in the way of Jeroboam.
The Bible doesn't mince words when it comes to sin. This verse uses stark language to describe King Baasha's spiritual condition.
A Moral Compass Reversed
The phrase "evil in the sight of the LORD" is a consistent theme throughout the books of Kings and Chronicles. It signifies a deliberate and deep-seated rebellion against God's commands and character.
Understand the original words
rāʿ · Hebrew Adjective/Noun
A general term for deeds, actions, or conduct that deviates from God's revealed will. In the context of Israel's kings, it specifically denotes apostasy, idolatry, and failure to uphold the covenant requirements of YHWH.
YHWH · Hebrew Proper Noun
The personal name of the covenant-making God of Israel. It represents His self-revelation, His faithfulness to His people, and the standard by which human conduct, especially leadership, is judged.
derek · Hebrew Noun
A metaphorical expression referring to a person's life pattern, moral character, or systematic religious devotion. Walking in a certain 'way' implies imitating the conduct and following the established principles of that leader.
ḥaṭṭā'ṯ · Hebrew Noun
c. 931 BC
Kingdom Splits
Following Solomon's death, the unified Kingdom of Israel splits into two: the Northern Kingdom (Israel) ruled by Jeroboam, and the Southern Kingdom (Judah) ruled by Rehoboam.
c. 931-910 BC
Jeroboam's Sinful Rule
Jeroboam, the first king of the Northern Kingdom, establishes rival worship centers with golden calves at Bethel and Dan to prevent his people from traveling to Jerusalem. This act becomes the hallmark sin of the northern kingdom.
c. 913-910 BC
Reign of Abijam in Judah
Abijam, son of Rehoboam, reigns in Judah. His reign is marked by conflict with the Northern Kingdom and by his own spiritual failings, though the text notes a flicker of divine favor.
c. 910-909 BC
Reign of Asa in Judah
Asa succeeds Abijam and initially does what is good in the sight of the LORD, removing idolatry. However, his later years see him rely on human alliances rather than God.
c. 909 BC
Reign of Baasha in Israel
This passage details Jeroboam's sin of setting up golden calves and establishing unauthorized religious festivals, directly linking to the 'way of Jeroboam' mentioned in our verse.
1 Kings 14:15-16This verse describes God's judgment on Israel for Jeroboam's sins, showing the severe consequences of leading the people into sin and establishing idolatrous practices.
2 Chronicles 13:8-12King Abijah confronts Jeroboam and his army, highlighting the sin of rebellion against God and the establishment of illegitimate worship, reinforcing the idea of walking in a sinful path.
2 Kings 17:21-23This passage explains the ultimate downfall of the northern kingdom of Israel, directly attributing their destruction to Jeroboam's persistent sin and God's judgment upon the nation.
This verse doesn't just say Baasha did evil; it highlights he copied Jeroboam's specific brand of rebellion. The text emphasizes that his sin wasn't just personal, but a deliberate perpetuation of the very actions that had already led Israel astray. It's a stark reminder that following a bad example can compound the spiritual damage.
This verse describes the reign of Baasha, the king of Israel. Following the turbulent succession after Jeroboam's death, Baasha continues the same pattern of idolatry and rebellion against God that marked Jeroboam's rule. His entire reign is characterized by this deliberate imitation of sin, leading the people astray and facing God's judgment.
This verse describes the reign of Baasha, the king of Israel. Following the turbulent succession after Jeroboam's death, Baasha continues the same pattern of idolatry and rebellion against God that marked Jeroboam's rule. His entire reign is characterized by this deliberate imitation of sin, leading the people astray and facing God's judgment.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about 1 Kings 15:34 is available in the Sola app.
A moral failure or rebellion against God’s law. In the context of the Northern Kingdom, it specifically refers to the establishment of unauthorized golden calf worship at Bethel and Dan, which caused the people to turn away from true worship in Jerusalem.
Baasha becomes king of Israel and continues the sinful legacy. He wages war against Judah, attempting to cut off access to Jerusalem.
c. 909-886 BC— this verse
Reign of Asa (Continued)
During Asa's extended reign in Judah, his successor in Israel, Baasha, initiates a reign of evil, directly following in Jeroboam's sinful footsteps. Asa is judged for his later actions but is spared because of his earlier reforms.
"He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD and walked in the way of Jeroboam and in his sin which he made Israel to sin." — This verse doesn't just say Baasha did evil; it highlights he copied Jeroboam's specific brand of rebellion. The text emphasizes that his sin wasn't just personal, but a deliberate perpetuation of…
