1 Corinthians 9:6
Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living?
English Standard Version (ESV)
1 Corinthians 9:6
Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living?
English Standard Version (ESV)
This page isn't yet indexed by search engines.
Here's the insight you might be missing: Paul's question isn't really about his right to support; it's a rhetorical jab that subtly highlights the principle he's already established: that all apostles have a right to be supported by their ministry. He's basically saying, "Are you really going to say that only Barnabas and I, out of all the apostles, have to work secular jobs to pay our own way?"
Paul is defending his right to receive financial support from the churches he serves, countering the Corinthians' criticism that he's exploiting them. He points out that he and Barnabas, unlike other apostles, haven't taken money for their ministry, even though the Scriptures and common sense would allow them to. This sets up his argument that he's choosing to forgo this right out of love for them, not because he doesn't have it.
Why would Paul even question his right to be supported? Doesn't he deserve a living wage for his hard work?
In 1 Corinthians 9, Paul is defending his apostolic authority and lifestyle choices. He lists several rights that apostles, including himself, possess. One of these is the right to be financially supported by the churches to whom they minister the Gospel. He argues that just as soldiers don't pay for their own rations, and farmers enjoy the fruit of their labor, those who serve the church full-time should be able to live from that service.
Paul doesn't just claim this right; he lays out the logic for it. It's a reasonable expectation based on the nature of the work and the blessings it brings. He's not asking for luxury, but for the ability to dedicate himself fully to the mission without being a financial burden or needing to work a separate trade.
If Paul had the right to be supported, why would he and Barnabas choose to work jobs instead?
Paul's rhetorical question highlights a deliberate choice. While the right to financial support from the church was established, Paul and Barnabas chose not to exercise it in this instance. This wasn't because they were incapable or unworthy, but for strategic reasons related to the Gospel ministry.
Paul often prioritized the advancement of the Gospel above his personal comfort or rights. By working secular jobs (he was a tentmaker), he removed any potential excuse for his critics to dismiss his message. He wanted to demonstrate that his motivation was pure and that he wasn't after financial gain. This self-denial was a tool, a sacrifice made to ensure the message of Christ could spread unhindered and be received more readily by those he was trying to reach.
Understand the original words
exousia · Greek Noun
A legal or moral claim to authority, privilege, or freedom of action; in this context, the legitimate authority of an apostle to receive support from those he serves.
Paul refers to Barnabas as a fellow laborer who also supported himself, highlighting that 'working for a living' was a common practice, even for apostles, and not necessarily a sign of lacking the 'right' to be supported by the church.
c. AD 33
Pentecost and the Early Church
The Holy Spirit empowers the apostles, leading to rapid growth of the church in Jerusalem. Believers share possessions and resources.
c. AD 35-45
Paul's Missionary Journeys Begin
Saul of Tarsus, now Paul, begins his extensive missionary work, establishing churches throughout the Roman Empire. Barnabas is a key early companion.
c. AD 48-49
Council of Jerusalem
A crucial meeting in Jerusalem addresses whether Gentile converts must follow Jewish law. Paul and Barnabas strongly advocate for freedom in Christ.
c. AD 50-52
Second Missionary Journey
Paul and Barnabas travel together, though they later separate due to a dispute over taking John Mark on the journey.
c. AD 53-57
This passage shows Paul working alongside Aquila and Priscilla as a tentmaker, illustrating his willingness to support himself, even while ministering.
2 Corinthians 11:7-12Paul defends his right to be supported by the church, but also explains why he chose not to exercise that right, emphasizing his desire to avoid hindering the gospel.
1 Thessalonians 2:9Here, Paul reminds the Thessalonians that he and his companions worked night and day, laboring and toiling, so that they would not burden any of them as they preached the gospel.
Philippians 4:11-12Paul speaks about learning to be content in any circumstance, whether he is in need or has plenty, demonstrating a self-sufficiency rooted in Christ that transcends material support.
Here's the insight you might be missing:
Paul's question isn't really about his right to support; it's a rhetorical jab that subtly highlights the principle he's already established: that all apostles have a right to be supported by their ministry. He's basically saying, "Are you really going to say that only Barnabas and I, out of all the apostles, have to work secular jobs to pay our own way?"
Paul is defending his right to receive financial support from the churches he serves, countering the Corinthians' criticism that he's exploiting them. He points out that he and Barnabas, unlike other apostles, haven't taken money for their ministry, even though the Scriptures and common sense would allow them to. This sets up his argument that he's choosing to forgo this right out of love for them, not because he doesn't have it.
Get the original Greek and Hebrew, verse-by-verse context, and related passages inside the app.
Ask a follow-up
Ask Sola things like:
Live chat about 1 Corinthians 9:6 is available in the Sola app.
Paul's Ministry in Corinth
Paul spends significant time in Corinth, a bustling commercial hub. He establishes a church there and likely supports himself through his trade as a tentmaker.
c. AD 55
Writing of 1 Corinthians
While in Ephesus or en route, Paul writes his first letter to the church in Corinth, addressing various issues of division, immorality, and doctrine.
Paul is defending his right to receive financial support from the churches he serves, countering the Corinthians' criticism that he's exploiting them. He points out that he and Barnabas, unlike other apostles, haven't taken money for their ministry, even though the Scriptures and common sense would allow them to. This sets up his argument that he's choosing to forgo this right out of love for them, not because he doesn't have it.
"Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living?" — Here's the insight you might be missing:
Paul's question isn't really about his right to support; it's a rhetorical jab that subtly highlights the principle he's already established: that all…